Vulture shortage threatens Zoroastrian burial rites
193 points
14 days ago
| 12 comments
| theguardian.com
| HN
KineticLensman
14 days ago
[-]
A factor that devastates African vulture populations is when poachers lace carcasses (e.g. rhinos killed for their horns) with poison, because vultures circling a kill reveal the presence of the poachers to wardens. A single big poisoned carcass can kill dozens of vultures at a time, of multiple species.
reply
jncfhnb
14 days ago
[-]
Isn’t it a myth that vultures circle kills
reply
swatcoder
14 days ago
[-]
They circle and kettle in other circumstances as well, but no, they definitely do circle iver carcasses (and what may soon become so). It's a familiar site if you live around them.

Do you remember where you heard it's a myth? I'd be curious to see how that argument was made.

reply
jncfhnb
14 days ago
[-]
The circling behavior is, as I read, almost always them waiting for a warm current to take them elsewhere.
reply
swatcoder
14 days ago
[-]
That's something they seem to do, for sure. It's just not the only thing.

They're not very vocal and are very social, so circling over carcasses might be a way to signal to others that they've found something.

They also form kettles as a big communal thing, too, for neither of those purposes. I've seen as many as 50 or 60 circling together for well over an hour, with no food nearby and no clearly no interest in going anywhere else.

(This is all turkey vultures in the US. These African vultures might have different behaviors, but I wouldn't be surprised if they are mostly comparable in terms of variety and sophistication)

reply
throwaway598
13 days ago
[-]
Perhaps an insight into vulture humour:

George the turkey vulture: It's a nice day to hang out circling.

Rambo the turkey vulture: Hey George, let's hang.

Pappias the turkey vulture: Where's the food? No food. LOL. You guys!

All: LOL (but silently).

Sydney the turkey vulture: Where's the food? No food. LOL. You guys!

All: LOL (but silently).

Violet the turkey vulture: Where's the food? No food. LOL. You guys!

All: LOL (but silently).

Sydney the turkey vulture: Where's the food? No food. LOL. You guys!

All: LOL (but silently).

Seven the turkey vulture: Where's the food? No food. LOL. You guys!

All: LOL (but silently).

Arnold the turkey vulture: Where's the food? No food. LOL. You guys!

All: LOL (but silently).

Angel the turkey vulture: Where's the food? No food. LOL. You guys!

All: LOL (but silently).

...

60 vultures later someone observes 60 vultures circling and concludes:

A. There's definitely no carcass, as that's a myth.

B. There's definitely a carcass, as there's 60 vultures.

C. I'm going to find some water to drink.

reply
pelagicAustral
13 days ago
[-]
I live in a place where Vultures are protected, so there's tons of them, and I have seen them circling in both cases, clearly hovering a carcass, but also randomly circling in numbers when no food is around...
reply
deepsun
13 days ago
[-]
As a soaring pilot I can confidently say that we circle when we _found_ the updraft. There's no "waiting", there's " searching" for it.
reply
thebeardisred
14 days ago
[-]
Where did you read this? I would love to learn more.
reply
jncfhnb
14 days ago
[-]
reply
swatcoder
14 days ago
[-]
Thanks for sharing these!

And yeah, on close read, you'll see that they're all trying to communicate that you can't assume that the vultures are circling a carcass whenever you see them circling because they have other behaviors that involve circling as well. But it's an easy detail to miss in some of them for sure!

reply
jncfhnb
13 days ago
[-]
I feel that’s not quite right. The writing appears to indicate that circling a carcass is the small minority. They’re finding the carcasses by smell of decay.

I’ve read elsewhere vultures are actually good signals of gas leaks for this reason.

They don’t have much of a reason to circle a carcass they intend to eat unless perhaps it’s a lagging indicator and they’re leaving the carcass. They don’t circle dying things because they don’t have the means to detect dying things.

I’m not convinced circling vultures is a good sign that there’s a carcass below them.

reply
DontchaKnowit
14 days ago
[-]
No. They'll even circle live animals if they can tell they are sick or dying.

I personally witnessed this in the city trash dump of Tegucigalpa. Emaciated cattle grazing in trash, with cultures circling above them.

reply
fakedang
14 days ago
[-]
Also vultures circling the battlefields of every Attila, Genghis Khan and Tamerlane, before swords were joined.;)
reply
KineticLensman
14 days ago
[-]
Myth or not, the poachers believe it and murder the vultures as a result.

I’ve worked with vultures at a raptor conservancy. They are social, curious and intelligent birds. I have very fond memories of an Egyptian vulture named Boe who would unfailingly undoe my shoelaces when I entered her aviary. I love these birds

reply
standeven
14 days ago
[-]
I’ve personally seen turkey vultures circle carcasses on several occasions.
reply
spookie
14 days ago
[-]
As someone who lived near Egyptian Vultures and Eurasian Black Vultures (Aegypius monachus), I can assure you they do. But that's not the only reason for them to do so.
reply
el_benhameen
14 days ago
[-]
Different area and I assume different vultures, but head on out to the east east bay in the summer and you’ll see plenty of vulture circles.
reply
optimalsolver
14 days ago
[-]
They absolutely do on the East African savannah.
reply
soulofmischief
14 days ago
[-]
I've witnessed it many times myself.
reply
celias
14 days ago
[-]
reply
miiiiiike
14 days ago
[-]
If you're only going to listen to one, listen to the Radiolab episode. The Radiolab episode is crisp and well reported, the 99% Invisible episode is muddled and rambling by comparison.
reply
ethbr1
13 days ago
[-]
Seconded. That Radiolab episode is one of the better ones I've listen to.

Mostly because it's laid out as "But that begs yet another question...", to which the answer is equally fascinating.

Also, it was just satisfying having a story with an ending: cause, found.

reply
boomboomsubban
14 days ago
[-]
If it's consumption of NSAID's that are killing the vultures, are the towers themselves not a risk? Are the dosages/drugs given to humans not a problem? Or is there some sort of preparation that would remove the NSAID's?

I tried to research the Zoroastrian procedure, but it got gory pretty fast.

reply
bakul
14 days ago
[-]
Diclofenac has been banned in India for veterinary use since 2006. Another NSAID that is not deadly to vultures is recommended for such use. Not sure why Guardian ran this story now as this is old news. The real crisis with plunging vulture population goes far beyond Zoroastrian burial rites. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_vulture_crisis
reply
boomboomsubban
14 days ago
[-]
That Wikipedia article is what made made curious, as it says "drugs like diclofenac..." From that small bit, it seems like the many NSAID's given to humans such as ibuprofen or asprin could be issues. Even diclofenac seems to have some human use.
reply
bakul
14 days ago
[-]
I suspect stronger drugs such as codeine etc are used for palliative care of humans in their last stages. Not sure of their effect on vultures. Parsi numbers have never been high and gradually decreasing (now about 70,000 in India), also they mainly live in relatively few places, most in Mumbai and nearby. The vulture population dropped from 40 million to a few hundred so the primary cause must be from their non-human diet.
reply
boomboomsubban
13 days ago
[-]
I assume NSAID's are still common, though opiates are stronger pain killers, antiinflammatory and fever reducers would still be helpful.

That said, I'm not arguing the official explanation is wrong, just curious if the same thing would happen at the towers.

reply
dyauspitr
14 days ago
[-]
And by decreasing you mean they are finally being assimilated into the general Indian population.
reply
bakul
14 days ago
[-]
Low fertility rates (like in most well to do communities), interfaith marriages (if you marry a non-parsi and your kids are not considered parsi), aging population, migration out of India.
reply
quonn
14 days ago
[-]
> Even diclofenac seems to have some human use.

Sure. Voltaren.

reply
bitwize
14 days ago
[-]
It's also administered orally.
reply
the__alchemist
14 days ago
[-]
I'm in South East, USA, vice the Indian subcontinent. Did something happen here within the last year? (Maybe the same thing?) I haven't seen vultures (Turkey vultures) in maybe 3/4 of a year. They are usually ubiquitous and highly visible due to large wingspan, staying airborne for long periods etc, using thermals from roads/concrete etc that make them common in human-populated areas.
reply
hedora
14 days ago
[-]
We have a lot of turkey vultures here in California.

A few years ago, we found a few fresh dead (poisoned) rats in our barn.

The turkey vulture population immediately dropped to zero at our house, and the rodent population skyrocketed for the next year.

Please use traps (electrocution or old-fashioned wood and metal spring work best. The electrocution ones are more pet-friendly), and not poison to deal with your vermin.

On a related note, we also have started to get Peregrine Falcons and Bald Eagles again.

Hopefully those populations will continue to recover too.

Poisoned rodents often wander around confused and screaming before they die, and if they do that in a field, they can take out a bird of prey instead of just the vultures.

Seriously, just use the traps. They are way more humane. Also, you won’t have to fish dead animals out of your vents and walls.

reply
bitwize
14 days ago
[-]
RatX, MouseX, and RatRid baits by EcoClear use a combination of gluten and salt to dehydrate the rodent, rather than poisoning it with toxins. Supposedly, they work well against rats and mice while being safe for larger animals, including birds of prey, to consume. People may wish to consider using these baits as well for rodent control.

https://ecoclearproducts.com/

One of my favorite pest-control measures is furry and purrs when I stroke him. Currently we don't have rodents, but he likes to catch insects as well.

reply
jncfhnb
14 days ago
[-]
Cats generally don’t like hunting rats
reply
tomrod
14 days ago
[-]
Funny, our barn cats growing up loved hunting everything, including rats. Maybe indoor cats might not be so inclined though.
reply
jncfhnb
13 days ago
[-]
reply
p3rls
13 days ago
[-]
The presence of the cat alone will deter rats from nesting nearby. The cat doesn't have to kill the rat just has to make it uncomfortable enough to leave. I work in fire protection in NYC (in the area referenced by the website and their experiment even) and see it all the time

https://pixeldrain.com/u/hocUQxjk proof :)

reply
tomrod
13 days ago
[-]
This link speaks to a different point with regard to effectiveness, not apparent enjoyment. (And to be fair to the barn cats, they did pretty well keeping not only rats and mice down, but also snakes and scorpions)
reply
jncfhnb
13 days ago
[-]
They don’t hunt rats because the rats are large enough to threaten the cat. They probably would win 95% of those fights cleanly but it’s risky enough to not be worthwhile. Enjoyment is certainly not a differentiating thing.

These are urban rats specifically which are larger and may not apply to country rats

reply
tomrod
13 days ago
[-]
I'll grant some cats don't hunt rats.

In our case it was more suburban rats, sometimes they did get big, yes.

reply
shkkmo
13 days ago
[-]
That seems like a biased source given they nake money killing rats.
reply
dyauspitr
14 days ago
[-]
They will if you don’t feed them.
reply
pfdietz
14 days ago
[-]
I went birding this morning near Ithaca, NY. Five turkey vultures, a bald eagle, and a kestrel (which caught and ate a mouse while we were watching) were among the species seen (and so many kinds of warblers. Really, why are there so many kinds of warblers?) I often see turkey vultures near our house (once a swooping flock of a dozen of them riding the wind coming up from the lake). Black vultures are starting to appear in this area also, most notably at the Cornell U. compost piles.
reply
nukeman
14 days ago
[-]
Old World Vultures are not closely related to New World Vultures (which are closer to storks). The mechanism which kills vultures in India and Africa does not present the same issue in vultures native to North America.
reply
mkl
13 days ago
[-]
The bit about being closer to storks seems disputed, and contradicted by more recent DNA evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_vulture
reply
LAC-Tech
14 days ago
[-]
All my schoolboy taxonomy feels useless now! Crazy that it was convergent evolution.
reply
codezero
14 days ago
[-]
I am in the South East too, but I see lots of vultures, but one weird? thing I noticed in the past 4 years is that I see them a lot more often in suburban areas/on sidewalks eating roadkill than I had seen them in the past (usually seeing them circling freeways or rural areas)
reply
Shawnj2
14 days ago
[-]
IIRC the issue is that new common drugs for humans contain toxins that are deadly to vultures in high doses. One issue with just creating a vulture sanctuary around towers of silence is that it’s nearly impossible to tell if a person has had any of those drugs and if so how much. Plus in that culture cremation/other forms of disposing of bodies are essentially sacrilege because the idea is that having the body touch the earth, fire, or water would be a bad thing which is why they do sky burials in the first place so it’s not like they can just refuse burials.
reply
NPC82
13 days ago
[-]
Here's a link to the general region you describe ordered by most recent sightings. You can zoom in on your specific location and look deeper or draw a new boundary. Hope this helps!

https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?nelat=40.7014779017...

reply
Ichthypresbyter
14 days ago
[-]
Maybe they flew north? I've seen plenty of them in Maryland this spring.
reply
devilbunny
14 days ago
[-]
Turkey vultures still going strong in my part of the SE USA.
reply
bbarnett
14 days ago
[-]
It's a well established fact that animal populations are cyclictic, booming then starving, then booming again.

Predator finds prey aplenty, and so is fruitful and multiplies. Then prey becomes so numerous, it eats prey until there are few left. Predator then has a population crash, and the prey rebound without predation.

Over and over this happens.

Is that what is happening here? Perhaps, as carrion eaters are susceptible too, when this happens to other populations. After all, during this cycle prey and predator both crash... leaving less carrion. And then of course carrion eaters can overpopulate too..

So I wonder, is this just another clickbait headline?

reply
nothercastle
14 days ago
[-]
Nah it’s probably rat poison here
reply
tdb7893
13 days ago
[-]
No it's not a click bait headline. Birds that eat carcasses have been in steep decline in many places because of very specific human generated pollutants in the dead animals (in India's case a pain reliever, in California it was lead, etc).
reply
yawpitch
14 days ago
[-]
> So I wonder, is this just another clickbait headline?

No. As the article makes abundantly clear there’s plenty of carrion, it’s just poisoned. Nothing natural about it.

reply
bbarnett
14 days ago
[-]
I see that's not even traditional poison, but instead something meant to help the cattle. Unfortunate.
reply
yawpitch
13 days ago
[-]
It’s not meant to help the cattle, it’s meant to preserve profits by treating the cattle for a disease they only have because they’re kept in unsanitary and overcrowded conditions.

The loss of the towers of silence is a turducken of human incompetence.

reply
EasyMark
14 days ago
[-]
that is probably true in the absence of humans, but modern humans ruin all these cycles when they become part of them, often kill apex predators just because they're bored or their activities inadvertently kill them (poisoning everything in site because you don't like mice/rats)
reply
totalconfusion
14 days ago
[-]
That's interesting, I wonder if this accelerates evolution from environmental pressure massively.
reply
rangerelf
14 days ago
[-]
Nice try Mr. Rat Poison Salesman.
reply
odyssey7
14 days ago
[-]
There’s a global epidemic of grievous inflammatory disease in cattle caused by the paratuberculosis bacterium.

The challenge can be solved entirely by vaccines, it’s just not prioritized. You can simply “cull” a sick cow and sell the diseased meat in the grocery store.

The article doesn’t say what the inflammatory diseases in the cows are in India, but I wonder if it’s the same.

Edit: Yes, researchers have identified widespread Paratuberculosis infections in India. “Our research on screening of over 26,000 domestic livestock for MAP infection using 4 different diagnostic tests (microscopy, culture, ELISA and PCR), during last 31 years has shown that the average bio-load of MAP in the livestock population of India is very high (cattle 43%, buffaloes 36%, goats 23% and sheep 41%).” [1]

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29090657/

reply
jajko
14 days ago
[-]
Even in Iran, the place for zoroastrianism, the towers of silence I've seen are completely unused for decades. I've visited ie one in Yazd just outside the city some 8 years ago when international relationships were at highest point (if I knew I would go there ten times, absolutely amazing country and people, completely unspoiled by mass tourism).

Zoroastrianism is fascinating and probably first major monotheistic religion and later ie judaism took a heavy inspiration from it. So much for everybody yelling how holiest their truth is and how chosen they specifically are, a lot of folks and mankind overall would benefit massively if they traveled more and more remote. I know I did.

They have concrete building not far where they put their dead instead, forgot the exact procedure unfortunately but clearly its still ok within their religion. If in holiest city of whole religion which houses 'eternal flame' they can manage this, maybe other places should take a note too?

reply
psunavy03
14 days ago
[-]
> Even in Iran, the place for Zoroastrianism, the Towers of Silence I've seen are completely unused for decades.

The fact that Iran is for all intents and purposes an Islamic theocracy with a veneer of democracy on top probably has something to do with this.

reply
LAC-Tech
14 days ago
[-]
You could have spent 5 minutes looking it up, rather than speculating.
reply
xhevahir
14 days ago
[-]
Yeah, no kidding. Iran hasn't been "the place for Zoroastrianism" in a very long time.
reply
jajko
14 days ago
[-]
If you think that Zoroastrianism there is heavily punished there by authorities, you are severely mistaken. Officially their number is roughly the same as in India, but in reality its much much more and they face no repressions that I could anyhow see or gather from talking to locals. But its not hard to understand why official numbers would not represent reality, unlike say in India which is cca democracy and this group is quite powerful there.

Or do you have more of personal experiences from Iran that contradict mine?

I've also been to beautifully restored old christian church in the heart of the big city (forgot which one, maybe Isfahan), no issues I just went in, there were masses happening there regularly. No hassle anywhere.

reply
moneywoes
13 days ago
[-]
is the decline due to the restriction around who can convert into the religion
reply
vundercind
13 days ago
[-]
I think it’s also one of those doesn’t-seek-converts plus you-leave-if-you-marry-outside religions.

Those two things plus lots of secrecy around actual beliefs and practices (that one’s less of a problem with Zoroastrianism iirc) seemed to always be factors in a book I once read about vanishing near-East religions. Basically mimetic-evolutionary action, if the religion has the wrong properties it’ll tend to decline.

reply
rustcleaner
14 days ago
[-]
Take with a grain of salt, but if Robert Sepehr's videos have any truth to them then the history and traditions which interweave from that time and place are rich and far reaching.

Sepehr:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xf4FOpS1rU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBkgI34mMH0

NOT Sepehr:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fI8rXPalMA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcMUBpC4leM

(Do your due dilligence!)

reply
rustcleaner
14 days ago
[-]
OUCH link 3 went private! It is titled "Sex The Secret Gate to Eden Gnostic Teachings" by Thelema Press and should be found elsewhere (if I notice it seemingly fully disappear, I can make it re-appear so seekers may find it and imbibe).
reply
kortex
13 days ago
[-]
It's not every day you come across Gnostic stuff on HN, but those links are super fascinating, I can't wait to check them out!

Zoroastrianism is such a fascinating topic.

reply
tazu
13 days ago
[-]
Sepehr is by far my favorite anthropologist, his videos are great.
reply
kortilla
14 days ago
[-]
> So much for everybody yelling how holiest their truth is and how chosen they specifically are

This is a non-sequitur and travel definitely will not solve the issue. People are very well aware of the many other religions even now currently being practiced and are still convinced theirs is correct.

reply
vundercind
13 days ago
[-]
I assure you a lot of Christians don’t even have a basic understanding of the Mediterranean and Levantine political situation at the time of the gospels (which kind of features heavily in them) let alone anything about contemporary local events in Messianic Judaism and anti-Roman sentiment. Other religions, currently-active or ancient (or both)? Nah. Zero or near-zero knowledge for most. That’s nerd shit.
reply
jajko
14 days ago
[-]
I am not claiming it will automatically click with every single simpleton who has been spoon fed one single truth since birth, thats extremely hard place to ever get from.

But seeing culture, people, history, and religions too puts a massive perspective change. I could see that ie my wife traveling across India backpacking had her eyes opened quite brutally compared to her strict catholic upbringing, and it was definitely this cultural/religious shock.

Seeing other religions as equal to yours - how many folks do you know that actually have that? Seeing refugees not as bothersome scum coming to rape and steal and take social payments but same people as you, with same type of dreams, fears etc... again this ain't something you will ever get to from watching news, and that's how most people get all their relevant info, thats the folks likes of trump feed from, from their fears and hate for things they don't actually know, only heard about.

Being treated the nicest from poorest people of the world (dalits in India in my case), complete stranger yet they shared the very little they had with me, and helped me tremendously, repeatedly.

There is tons of islamophobia in Europe, especially in eastern part but I can see it literally everywhere. Most folks like that I talked to have absolutely 0 clue, they just pick few worst news about terrorism attacks, some 'alternate' media talking same stuff for 2 decades. Yes going to all-inclusive package tour to say Egypt and staying in absolute tourist bubble for 2 weeks ain't going to change anybody. I wasn't talking about that sort of traveling, but exact opposite of it.

reply
kortilla
13 days ago
[-]
> Seeing other religions as equal to yours - how many folks do you know that actually have that?

I’m not sure what country you’re from, but in my current city there are large successful populations of Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, Christians, and Buddhists.

If you grow up not exposed to that, I can see how travel might help for people with an open mind. But let me assure you, a very annoyingly large percentage of the population (something like 20%) thinks everyone not in their religion is a lesser human.

reply
moneywoes
13 days ago
[-]
what did you learn? very interested
reply
mehulashah
14 days ago
[-]
It’s interesting how burial rituals change over time. Now, we’re talking about composting our bodies, which in some sense returns the remaining minerals back to where they came from in the earth.
reply
dyauspitr
14 days ago
[-]
Which is what burial also accomplishes. What’s composting a human body outside of a burial?
reply
defrost
13 days ago
[-]
Oddly enough, from 7 days ago:

What is human composting and should it be legalised? https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-27/calls-to-legalise-hum...

mos_basik mostly has it aside from bone grinding at some point, human skulls turning over in the market garden can be disconcerting and a nuisance for law enforcement so it's considered polite to remove and|or grind them.

reply
mos_basik
13 days ago
[-]
I think the difference is that if you go to a funeral home in the US and say "I'd like one burial, plain, no sugar" you will end up dressed in fancy clothes, filled with formaldehyde and a decent amount of sawdust, lying on soft polyester cushions and frills in a fancy varnished hardwood box with a lacquer finish and nearly airtight seal. This goes into the ground and then (I'm less to believe) largely doesn't change for decades.

Whereas if you go to a human composting place and ask to be composted, you get packed into a tube with enough wood chips and straw to create the right carbon to nitrogen ratio and a few scoops of microbes and fungi and held at an optimum temperature and oxygen content until you turn into soil. Then you get delivered in the back of a pickup truck and hopefully someone uses you to plant a tree or something.

Not to say that burial is always mutually exclusive with returning your nutrients to the earth - just that the default approach to burial these days isn't so good at it.

reply
charlysl
13 days ago
[-]
Vultures are actually fascinating, team workers that collaborate with crows and magpies to clean the countryside from carcasses.

There is an excellent documentary about this in Spanish: https://youtu.be/4bLO8d0e9O4?si=z2BUAz-90BhWGBdl

reply
LAC-Tech
14 days ago
[-]
I'm always a little jealous that there still exists an active, continuously practised Indo-European religion in Iran, even if a minor one. They have something that Europeans and their diaspora have lost.
reply
dyauspitr
14 days ago
[-]
Hinduism. It’s 1/7th of humanity.
reply
LAC-Tech
14 days ago
[-]
Sure, but that's further away from Europe :)
reply
dyauspitr
14 days ago
[-]
I feel you. Unfortunately once it’s gone, it’s gone forever. Any attempt at revival seems corny and contrived and lacks any gravitas.
reply
moneywoes
13 days ago
[-]
IndoEuropean meaning?
reply
mkl
13 days ago
[-]
It's a language family [1] deriving from a hypothetical shared root language and population, with hypothesised religion [2]. Abrahamic religions' origins, like the Semitic languages they're associated with, are not Indo-European.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_mythology

reply
i_am_a_peasant
13 days ago
[-]
I feel more sorry that the planet is losing yet another species that took billions of years to evolve rather than the rites of some religion tbh, the agenda of this article is so weird.
reply
not_your_mentat
13 days ago
[-]
I get sky burials. I'm still waiting for someone to explain sky births to me.
reply
chefkd
13 days ago
[-]
In my head its giving birth wile skydiving or on reentry from orbit but I thought the same thing about sky burials until I googled it haha :)
reply
dctoedt
14 days ago
[-]
"Our culture" really means "the ways in which we've become accustomed to doing things (because reasons), and which we believe everyone else should recognize as an entitlement for us."

Likewise, "our culture is dying" seems like an overly-dramatic catch phrase for, "we don't like it that circumstances are changing and reducing our ability to do things in the manner to which we've become accustomed and are now entitled."

EDIT: As another commenter correctly says, it's not a great idea to drive vultures into extinction. My comment is about people whinging about it in a way that suggests it's all about them.

reply
amenhotep
14 days ago
[-]
People in valuing intangible things for not obviously rational reasons that can be easily dismissed if you approach the entire world with an attitude of smug cynicism shock
reply
dctoedt
14 days ago
[-]
Valuing intangible things ≠ whinging when those intangibles are no longer adaptive to circumstances.
reply
bbarnett
14 days ago
[-]
One thing that really bothers me, is a frozen culture. For example, Native Canadians would have a changed culture by now, 500 years after we showed up.

Before our arrival, there was war between Native nations, cultural change due to trade and new inventions, and so on.

Unless people believe that Natives didn't have new ideas, this is clearly so. And Native history shows change!

To imagine that 500 years later, no music, language, culture, technology would have changed, is a massive disservice to both the intellect and capabilities of those peoples.

Yet we enable things such as unrestrained hunting, and even whale hunting, for cultural reasons.

As if a healthy Native nation wouldn't stop hunting endangered species! Come on!

So yes, static "this is the way it was" is a load of hurtful outcomes.

For all we know, Natives might have invented our tech by now, had we not intervened.

reply
pbj1968
14 days ago
[-]
Well, given as they couldn’t come up with a functional wheel on their own… highly doubtful.
reply
bbarnett
13 days ago
[-]
You need a few things to care about wheels. Some sort of idle class with free time, domesticated draft animals, and an industrial base.

Basically, people need to stop moving around and hunting to live, which means crops and domesticated food/work animals. And large cities for a strong industrial base.

There were few places where all that came together. Maybe the Incans? But they also has waterways and slaves.

But I agree, the timing was short.

reply
bobthepanda
14 days ago
[-]
> As if a healthy Native nation wouldn’t stop hunting endangered species!

The North American megafauna didn’t disappear all by themselves. More recently, the Maori certainly made some species go extinct in New Zealand. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Zealand_species_ex...

If you’re going to recognize that natives/first nations/etc. have agency then we have to accept the good and the bad instead of infantilizing them according to some fantasy ideal.

reply
bbarnett
14 days ago
[-]
That wasn't my meaning.

We have hunting quotas, and attempt to mitigate over fishing, and so on. Yes, we aren't perfect, but we try.

My point was, if a contempary Native nation existed, had modern agriculture methods, and was able to subsist without hunting? I suspect they would self regulate as we do.

reply
sungho_
14 days ago
[-]
You seem to think that the only value of something is its practicality
reply
oivey
14 days ago
[-]
I doubt that. You’d need to test taking away one of this person’s non-essential luxuries to find out.
reply
ericd
14 days ago
[-]
If you read the article itself, it's probably also just generally not a great idea to drive vultures into extinction.
reply
dctoedt
14 days ago
[-]
> it's probably also just generally not a great idea to drive vultures into extinction.

On that we definitely agree! My comment is about people making it all about them.

reply
i_am_a_peasant
13 days ago
[-]
This tbh
reply
geraneum
13 days ago
[-]
> "Our culture" really means "the ways in which we've become accustomed to doing things (because reasons), and which we believe everyone else should recognize as an entitlement for us."

This could be the laziest definition of culture that I’ve read so far.

reply
dctoedt
13 days ago
[-]
It's a translation of the word as used in context.

I suppose I could have added "Here," to be more clear that it's not a definition.

reply
geraneum
13 days ago
[-]
Right, this could be the laziest translation (to English?) of the word culture in any context, that I’ve read so far.

There, I fixed it.

reply
dctoedt
13 days ago
[-]
Today's Pearls Before Swine comic is relevant concerning "translation": One of the characters has a "magic translation box" to translate "politicianish" into "the truth." I did something similar in my original comment above.

https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2024/05/05

reply
dctoedt
13 days ago
[-]
"Laziest" — you misspelled concise, right? Or I guess you meant succinct.
reply
Boogie_Man
14 days ago
[-]
Cultural and religious traditions bind us to the past and the future.
reply
drawkward
14 days ago
[-]
Monocultures are fragile.
reply
exe34
14 days ago
[-]
This point of view isn't common, get used to it!
reply