Aren't these happening regularly ? We're always before a US election
Why aren’t apples oranges?
Regardless I don't see why sigmoid10 was downvoted.
The ex-CTO didn’t want to release GPT3 for fear of fake news articles, but OAI did anyway.
Safety doesn’t seem to be their biggest concern, unless they’re making inroads with politicians by fearmongering AI danger.
They are already dealing with insane amount of GPU compute
It looked really really good at the time. I’m sure it’d only be better now.
Dreamweaver is stagnated. Fireworks died years ago and they killed Freehand right away.
Just proves, Adobe bought Macromedia just to kill the competition and for Flash which was popular at the time for video on the web.
Thanks for the link.
So if they can't make softweare (acrobat), they make AI. /s
I think the only statements saying that they don't train on their customer data is from their CEO, but unless they encode it in their tos, that doesn't really matter.
https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/06/06/clarification-a...
Do you think they just stream any photos you've opened with Photoshop to Adobe?
Even without customer data to train on, they do have a pretty large moat with their image library. And you are right, they are in a good position VS competitors who trained on data they don't have rights to. We'll have to see how things play out legally, but I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up that something like midjourney ends up in an untenable position. However, openAI has a huge amount of funds that could be redirected to fight a oegal/lobbying battle. While they aren't a direct Adobe competitor, their whole business revolves around using unliscenced data to train their models, so they have a pretty clear horse in this race.
Or they just leave it up and admit they didn't need the rights and their library being cleared of rights isn't really a value add.