Casio has released a ring in the form of its iconic watch
190 points
by prvt
11 months ago
| 21 comments
| theverge.com
| HN
myself248
11 months ago
[-]
Six digit, not six segment. Each digit has seven segments.

I've seen this a LOT lately, when did everyone forget what segments were?

reply
daghamm
11 months ago
[-]
You don't need to read past the title for the first big error.

BTW, is The Verge sharing my browsing data with 855 partners? Folks, belive me, I am not that interesting!

reply
tomcam
11 months ago
[-]
Don’t be modest. Your data is worth sharing with at least 1150 partners. I believe in you!
reply
agile-gift0262
11 months ago
[-]
> Folks, belive me, I am not that interesting!

Several of the greatest fortunes of modern capitalism have been made through surveillance of people that "are not that interesting"

reply
yapyap
11 months ago
[-]
> Folks, belive me, I am not that interesting!

you’d be surprised

reply
hn92726819
11 months ago
[-]
If you write code for the f91w you'll quickly realize you can't actually control every segment: https://www.sensorwatch.net/docs/wig/display/#limitations-of.... Some digits have only 4, 5, or 6 controllable segments.

But that's probably not what the author was getting at :)

reply
ok_dad
11 months ago
[-]
Young people may not have ever seen a display like that.
reply
meowster
11 months ago
[-]
They most likely see displays like that on microwaves.
reply
ok_dad
11 months ago
[-]
I meant seen as in seen it named. Just because the seven segment display is there doesn’t mean it’s named that on the box, while in the past there might be more stuff with those displays and it would be a callout on the box design possibly.

I got ratioed here, for some reason, so I guess I didn’t communicate properly. Most people here are nerds who might know what this is called but the average person doesn’t.

reply
nefrix
11 months ago
[-]
In grandma’s kitchen.
reply
saltcured
11 months ago
[-]
I understand a grandma could have had a microwave. After all, I remember radar ranges with mechanical timers that were already relics when I was a child. But, now you've got me wondering what kind of VR/holographic microwaves kids are buying.

My latest bought a couple years ago still has a 7-segment vacuum fluorescent display. And a digital encoder knob and buttons rather than membrane controls. And a "cyclonic" inverter, which from the marketing diagrams, you would think can bend reality to your whims.

reply
kalleboo
11 months ago
[-]
> But, now you've got me wondering what kind of VR/holographic microwaves kids are buying.

Our microwave has a fully graphic, monochrome LCD. And Wi-Fi. Of course. https://kalleboo.com/microblog/posts/109720164680381672.html

reply
SoftTalker
11 months ago
[-]
> radar ranges with mechanical timers

Those were the best. Dead simple to operate. That said I still have the Goldstar microwave I bought over 30 years ago, which has a keypad and digital timer.

reply
dmd
11 months ago
[-]
I'm 46 and my grandma had a microwave by the time I was cooking in her kitchen in 1984.
reply
01HNNWZ0MV43FF
11 months ago
[-]
Did air fryers already displace microwaves? I've missed the last couple meetings
reply
emchammer
11 months ago
[-]
One of my friends owns a normal-looking radar range kitchen oven. It can cooks with both the convection oven and the microwave at the same time. It is from the 1970s and has all mechanical dials. It has a metal rack inside and you can use any cookware, without a metal lid I guess.
reply
throwaway494932
11 months ago
[-]
Microwaves are great a two things (and little else...): warm up liquids and make popcorn. Neither are properly done by an air fryer.

I have both tools and they have completely different uses.

edit: both sport 7-segment digits though

reply
jimmydddd
11 months ago
[-]
I think maybe the original killer app for microwaves was baked potatoes? An hour to cook in a conventional oven. 5 minutes in a microwave. But maybe no one eats those anymore?
reply
acuozzo
11 months ago
[-]
I eat one on most nights. I wouldn't without my microwave oven.
reply
Izkata
11 months ago
[-]
I haven't tried that, but my guess would be the same problem as most solids in a microwave - uneven heating / cold spots. That's why liquids and popcorn work so well, liquids mix themselves up and the unpopped kernels fall to the bottom of the bag.
reply
CTOSian
11 months ago
[-]
I have one (800w) that takes about 5min to cook a potato (200gr), the manual suggests "once the potatoes are cooked, wrap them in tin foil for at least 5 minutes to cook through" but I just cook one wrapped with baking paper.
reply
shrx
11 months ago
[-]
Also defrosting
reply
wormius
11 months ago
[-]
Tina's. Burritos.

I am a worm of class.

reply
silisili
11 months ago
[-]
Technically popcorn is just warming up liquids as well. I'd say that's all it's good at, which happens to have a handful of usecases(some frozen meals, popcorn, melting cheese, heating leftovers).
reply
ok_dad
11 months ago
[-]
Technically all microwave oven use is warming up liquid if you want to get down to the basics.
reply
meowster
11 months ago
[-]
TIL I'm a grandma.
reply
lttlrck
11 months ago
[-]
But they must have heard of the obvious word choice: "digit".

This is seems like "word I heard misappropriation".

reply
FpUser
11 months ago
[-]
Those are everywhere. Many are in storefronts
reply
don-code
11 months ago
[-]
The original announcement from Casio said they'd be making a ring version of the venerable DBC-611 calculator watch as well: https://www.g-central.com/casio-to-release-casio-watch-ring-...

It looks like they've instead made a ring version of the CA-53W, which - in the staggeringly few times I see someone wearing a calculator watch - is usually the one they're wearing.

I still wear a DBC-610 as my daily driver, and I do use the calculator and countdown timer features quite often.

reply
faangguyindia
11 months ago
[-]
I am glad I learned abacus method to not rely on these gimmick watches with calculators.
reply
card_zero
11 months ago
[-]
Possible market for a watch with an abacus? Doodles on napkin
reply
dylan604
11 months ago
[-]
Wouldn't you need 10 rings; one for each finger?
reply
javajosh
11 months ago
[-]
Actually, I think an abacus ring is a great idea or it could be multiple rings on the same finger where the main benefit is you could keep keep count of something. If you had three rows of small beads, you could theoretically keep track of up to a thousand things, all without a battery and with perfect accuracy. Additionally, you could keep track in a very low profile way if the beads were on the inside of the ring toward the palm of your hand and you manipulated them with your thumb. The beads would have to have a slight friction to them so they stay in place but are still easy to move. But in general I like the idea and it's at least as appealing as the op Casio watch ring.
reply
Cumpiler69
11 months ago
[-]
I would wear 11 of them for the calculation functionality.
reply
ridgeguy
11 months ago
[-]
Nope. One ring to rule them all.
reply
WorkerBee28474
11 months ago
[-]
Don't forget to include a sundial to tell time
reply
CTOSian
11 months ago
[-]
Darn Casio... someone pls nudge HP !!! We def need RPN ring calculators!
reply
ajsnigrutin
11 months ago
[-]
The calculator buttons would probably be too small for a ring.
reply
Fluorescence
11 months ago
[-]
So you're saying it retains the authentic Casio calculator watch experience?

It's 30+ years since I owned one but I recall having to press the buttons with the corner of a nail and cursing if I thoughtlessly cut them!

reply
kevin_thibedeau
11 months ago
[-]
Touch screen with graffiti input.
reply
hombre_fatal
11 months ago
[-]
Haha, I love it! I wear the gold calculator watch because it's fun and peculiar. I'd love to get a gold casio ring.
reply
awelxtr
11 months ago
[-]
> The ring watch’s screen even has a light, and an alarm function that will flash the display instead of playing an audible sound

That is a bit... Underwhelming isn't it?

reply
kijin
11 months ago
[-]
A vibration motor would have been even better, but I suppose there wasn't enough space inside for that. Nor for a speaker.

This is Casio, though. If they really want to, the next version could very well contain all of that and a solar battery.

reply
dylan604
11 months ago
[-]
> A vibration motor would have been even better,

The best alarm clock I've ever had is a smartwatch that does this vibrating. No more stupid digital screaming. Just a nice gentle tapping pattern on my wrist, and then a fading bit of music. I'm usually awake and hitting stop before the music really starts.

reply
schwarzrules
11 months ago
[-]
Same, except I wear this: https://www.amazon.com/Timex-T49950-Expedition-Shock-Vibrati...

It's a "dumb" Timex watch, but also vibrates. So you get that same nice gentle vibrating without any "smart" alerts.

reply
Cumpiler69
11 months ago
[-]
I have the smaller older variant of the Timex Explorer and is still my most worn out of my whole collection despite its ugliness since it's by far the most useful due to the vibration alarms, great UX and features. Shame they don't make it anymore and has only been replaces with this gigantor edition.
reply
Rendello
11 months ago
[-]
A vibration motor on the index finger could make it... multifunctional.
reply
numpad0
11 months ago
[-]
No Casio watch owners know how to turn on/off alarms and it's annoying, so IMO it's only sensible that this does not have it. I've turned it off on my F-91W but frankly have no recollection as to how.
reply
stackedinserter
11 months ago
[-]
I hope they included the iconic worst-in-the-world backlight into it.
reply
wkat4242
11 months ago
[-]
True, their EL tech was one of the best in that day and age though. Weird how they pivoted from so bad to so good.
reply
ycombinatrix
11 months ago
[-]
Why is this so true for every casio lol
reply
petesergeant
11 months ago
[-]
This feels like something you’d win at a carnival
reply
resoluteteeth
11 months ago
[-]
Yeah, I actually got an extremely similar looking (but presumably more cheaply made) digital watch ring as a prize at an arcade type place that had games that spat out tickets that you could redeem for prizes around 30 years ago
reply
fatfox
11 months ago
[-]
It looks a bit silly but also a lot of fun!
reply
Rinzler89
11 months ago
[-]
I want one Casio watch ring for me and each of my friends and with our powers combined we are Captain Nerd.
reply
xanderlewis
11 months ago
[-]
It looks utterly stupid. I’ll take three, please.
reply
ezekg
11 months ago
[-]
What is this, a watch for ants?
reply
danans
11 months ago
[-]
What kind of monster ants have legs are as thick as human fingers wherever you are? God help you if so.
reply
p1mrx
11 months ago
[-]
reply
bloomingeek
11 months ago
[-]
OMG, put it on a chain and wear it around my neck!
reply
ycombinatrix
11 months ago
[-]
Flavor Flav walked so you could run
reply
generalizations
11 months ago
[-]
That could actually be really useful. I'd love to wear a dumbwatch again, and if it's that much smaller then its that much better. Will be keeping an eye out for one that isn't nostaliga-themed.
reply
hunter-gatherer
11 months ago
[-]
I have a gshock 5600-e that was passed down from my brother who wore it for uses in a metal fab mill. This watch is amazing. Definitely get a gshock
reply
hermitcrab
11 months ago
[-]
I love my G-shock GW/6900. It is pretty bulletproof. Apart from the strap - annoyingly I have to replace that once every ~3 years.
reply
franczesko
11 months ago
[-]
There are g-shocks with bracelets. I have a model with a plastic one.
reply
hermitcrab
11 months ago
[-]
I have the plastic/resin strap. They don't last. They crack and the strap holder breaks.
reply
dukeofdoom
11 months ago
[-]
A wrap around display ring would be cool.
reply
naruhodo
11 months ago
[-]
21st century mood ring!
reply
franczesko
11 months ago
[-]
Digital watches in general have their charm https://youtu.be/mDVmdgao3RE?si=sfpEEkri1mmOvdAV
reply
wkat4242
11 months ago
[-]
Cool and functional. I hope this comes to Europe too.
reply
bookofjoe
11 months ago
[-]
reply
blackeyeblitzar
11 months ago
[-]
This is the type of thing I would not purchase for myself, but I’m happy to see exist. Brilliant design.
reply
gherkinnn
11 months ago
[-]
Not for me but I love the idea.
reply
schneems
11 months ago
[-]
In Japan. The price is high but I still like it.
reply
0cf8612b2e1e
11 months ago
[-]
$128 is really pushing the limit for what seems like a kitsch novelty. Were it a third of the price, I could see myself picking it up for my watch aficionado friend.
reply
GeoAtreides
11 months ago
[-]
> kitsch novelty

you mean limited release collectable?

reply
sss111
11 months ago
[-]
Blame Inflation :/

That said, Casio novelties do hold their value surprisingly well. For example, just by wearing my Gravitymaster, I’ve already “earned” $130 as the resell value has shot up.

reply
Cumpiler69
11 months ago
[-]
>Blame Inflation :/

N'ah mate, I feel Casio is also quite cheeky with their pricing for what is essentially mass produced budget commodity 80's tech made in China from cheap plastics.

Here in Europe most of their basic watches (excluding the F91W) are over 40+ Euros and all they do is show time/date on a cheap LCD display with poor viewing angles in a plastic resin shell who's paint rubs off after a couple of years.

Meanwhile for that price you can get an Xiaomi smart band with OLED display, gorilla glass, Bluetooth, vibration, heart-rate sensor, and it even tells time. Casio's profits must be crazy good on those watches.

I wish they would sell more models in metal casings like in the 80's and with updated internals with more functionality.

reply
michelb
11 months ago
[-]
You should see what the Timex limited edition ring goes for now. I bet you can flip this Casio for a nice multiple as well.
reply
0cf8612b2e1e
11 months ago
[-]
Then you are playing the limited edition collection game. Which is a game of no interest to me.
reply
laweijfmvo
11 months ago
[-]
gorilla glass i hope, otherwise its scratch city for my clumsy hands
reply
hereme888
11 months ago
[-]
No....nope. Don't like it. Why would someone spend $128 for that?
reply
ThouYS
11 months ago
[-]
hillarious
reply