What’s particularly intriguing is how regulations are playing a pivotal role. For example:
The EU's Farm to Fork strategy targets a 50% reduction in chemical pesticides by 2030. Canada has allocated CAD 75 million for sustainable agriculture research, focusing on biopesticides. Innovation is also heating up. One example is Marrone Bio Innovations' upcoming bioherbicide (launching 2025), which targets herbicide-resistant weeds using Streptomyces acidiscabies.
This raises some interesting questions:
Are bioherbicides the solution to making agriculture more sustainable, or are there hidden challenges (e.g., scalability, cost, or efficacy)? How critical are regulatory changes in driving the adoption of such technologies? Is there potential for open innovation or collaboration between startups and larger agricultural companies to speed up progress in this space?
As for sustainable, well it is going to depend if there any more instances where unintended biological consequences despite well meaning aims.
The main problem in the Australian market I see is that once an already existing biological product competes well, it may lead to forcing out the old competition such it's not worthwhile for a chemical company to have a particular herbicide product tested once more and registered for use within Australia, the price of the new biological product will become prohibitive for less well off farmers.