Bioherbicides: The Future of Sustainable Agriculture or Just a Niche Trend?
4 points
12 days ago
| 1 comment
| HN
I recently came across insights into the growing bioherbicides market and found some fascinating trends worth discussing with the community. The market is projected to grow from $2.22 billion in 2024 to $5.86 billion by 2031, fueled by a shift toward sustainable agriculture, organic farming, and weed resistance to chemical herbicides.

What’s particularly intriguing is how regulations are playing a pivotal role. For example:

The EU's Farm to Fork strategy targets a 50% reduction in chemical pesticides by 2030. Canada has allocated CAD 75 million for sustainable agriculture research, focusing on biopesticides. Innovation is also heating up. One example is Marrone Bio Innovations' upcoming bioherbicide (launching 2025), which targets herbicide-resistant weeds using Streptomyces acidiscabies.

This raises some interesting questions:

Are bioherbicides the solution to making agriculture more sustainable, or are there hidden challenges (e.g., scalability, cost, or efficacy)? How critical are regulatory changes in driving the adoption of such technologies? Is there potential for open innovation or collaboration between startups and larger agricultural companies to speed up progress in this space?

anenefan
12 days ago
[-]
I can only speak of Australian / Queensland trends and moves to include biological control have less to do with direct official policy (AFAIK) and more to natural innovation and R&D by various universities and other agricultural based entities to further Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices. No doubt there would be some indirect policy that would prompting better or safer methods of weed control.

As for sustainable, well it is going to depend if there any more instances where unintended biological consequences despite well meaning aims.

The main problem in the Australian market I see is that once an already existing biological product competes well, it may lead to forcing out the old competition such it's not worthwhile for a chemical company to have a particular herbicide product tested once more and registered for use within Australia, the price of the new biological product will become prohibitive for less well off farmers.

reply