AI Tools: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking
34 points
9 months ago
| 8 comments
| mdpi.com
| HN
alganet
9 months ago
[-]
> The pervasive availability of AI tools, which offer quick solutions and ready-made information, can discourage users from engaging in the cognitive processes essential for critical thinking

Yes, the quickest way for making AIs smarter than humans is to make humans dumber. (I know that this isn't what the author is saying, but the industry is going that way).

reply
retskrad
9 months ago
[-]
Every time a new technology comes around, people say society is going down. Socrates famously claimed that writing text down on paper provides only the semblance of wisdom, not true understanding, because it allows for passive consumption of information rather than active engagement with it. For Socrates, true knowledge came from dialogue and internal reflection, not from external, static texts.

It’s ironic that nowadays we put reading books on a pedestal and designate it as the antidote to social media! No one today would argue that reading a book is a poor use of one’s time.

reply
bayindirh
9 months ago
[-]
I think there's a misunderstanding on Socrates quote.

There are many things where one can get a superficial understanding of how something is done, or what's the effect of some experience upon the self.

On the other hand, these understandings will be superficial and won't be able to capture the whole details, nuances and personal differences.

One person may be aware that physical activity is good by reading a book, but can never understand "how, how much, and in what way" unless they do exercises themselves. Somebody can read a programming or project management book end to end, but they'll face the reality and experience the highs and lows of the trade only and when they put their hands on the keyboard or join a project as a manager.

On this aspect Socrates is absolutely correct. Book and written media is a starting point, not a destination.

AI will be beneficial if we treat it as the absolute baseline and do our own thinking and building upon it. The people who think what AI emits is the ultimate and final destination will be doomed.

reply
skywhopper
9 months ago
[-]
Socrates was hardly universally correct, and he was certainly wrong about this. Even his own students didn’t take this particular idea seriously.
reply
pera
9 months ago
[-]
Papyrus had existed for at least a couple of thousands of years before Socrates so I'm not sure I understand your argument
reply
kkfx
9 months ago
[-]
Well... we will lose handwriting ability, and also the ability to read handwritten texts, but we have already (almost) substitute such abilities with something more efficient. This means than on one side we "popularize" things before "to far from common people knowledge" while we live more room for different skilled people in more specific segments of the human knowledge.

This means that cognitive abilities have to change, as are always changed through history. We will have some "generic workers" able to do something like small potatoes IT, data science, architectural design etc, without really much competences and few who decide to dig something and acquire skills "like in the past". I see not much difference in the old adage "with the printed books we will lose the real knowledge and epistemological skills", it was a bit true indeed, but back then 99% of the people was even unable to read, after a sizeable amount of people acquire poor but still present reading skills, and some still remain knowledgeable anyway.

I expect in the future not very cultured people been able to do stuff now done only by few, while still some will be really cultured like today.

reply
camillomiller
9 months ago
[-]
The findings from this study are quite scary if confirmed. We are blindly accepting to be made dumber. I know that’s what teachers used to say about TI calculators, but the order of magnitude here is way bigger. And my TI certainly was never “agentic”.
reply
timeon
9 months ago
[-]
Argument with calculator is good example how we have tendency to dumb down. If there is just slight association we tend to put equals between the things - which is dangerous reduction for critical thinking.
reply
impure
9 months ago
[-]
I do believe that AI tools, especially in coding, cause abilities to atrophy. However after reviewing the paper I find it less than convincing. There is a -0.68 correlation but as it appears to mostly rely on self-reported data and does not tell us what the actual scores are I don't know what this means. Plus I don't know if these are long term effects or just short term. Although they might have beat me to it, "One potential direction is to investigate the longitudinal effects of AI tool usage on critical thinking skills over time."
reply
gmuslera
9 months ago
[-]
Driving cars is unsafe too, there are right and wrongs ways to use them. With AIs is the same, can help you to go forward or work in a higher abstraction layer or do the work for you.
reply
camillomiller
9 months ago
[-]
This wasn't about safety, but about cognitive abilities. What about comparing at least the same thing? If anything the example is exactly the contrary. Driving a car develops a set of cognitive spatial abilities you wouldn't have otherwise...
reply
gmuslera
9 months ago
[-]
It is safe to use AIs in certain way or you would risk to impact your cognitive abilities?

If there is a perceived potential damage, then there is a risk and maybe a safer way to do that.

reply
psteitz
9 months ago
[-]
The study does not appear to be longitudinal, so what it is showing is association, not causality. It could actually be foreboding a kind of "rich get richer, poor get poorer" spiral as the "cognitively advantaged" offload less, dampening the (undemonstrated) impact on their critical thinking skills.
reply
amunozo
9 months ago
[-]
It all goes down on how do you use it. It can enhance your cognitive abilities or substitute them. It's a danger to those who don't want to think but are forced to, as now they could just not do it. For us who like to think, it can make wonders amplifying our options.
reply