We had the opportunity to launch it a week ago and you can find the video of our launch here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16bsLzxjP7OWRqVvCB62cLv7QYLR...
During the launch we reached 400m above sea level, and the can pulled 70gs successfully. The parachute and can stayed intact. Unfortunately, on the day, we were unable to successfully implement GPS.
The raw results are here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oK1vukjcNcsaXMAPeFlzZ66aHlR... And a slightly cleaned up version is here:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xYhkp3sWoJF0bCkkvFs1AygSdLU...
I used my data presentation software to present our results here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-r7lT0J4MDLiYfuaasDXJsr5rCA... The software (in the form of a python script to be executed in blender) can be found here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LHP7OwgI_O8t6-NBI0ZPn9JUt2G... It's not pretty, but it works.
The differences in temperature and pressure results were exaggerated in the so that the gradient could be clearly seen.
Unfortunately, we did not get into the final (judged on this document) but it was an awesome experience nevertheless. The judges used this form to mark us: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eZnum5zuJvkLzY7RLtm9A-NNzxw... We would love to get any feedback from more experienced people, as we intend to do similar projects in the future and at least two of us want to be professional engineers. I'm happy to reply to any comments.
Edit: harsh marking on the risk register. Very realistic practice for dealing with ESA in a professional context! I do like the flowcharts and block diagrams
Not that NASA is any better. I spend a huge amount of time dealing with pedantic RIDs instead of actually implementing the things I am paid to do...
I only read the first document so apologies if this is covered elsewhere.
But PLA tends to burn/melt/disintegrate in direct sunlight, I imagine its worse outside the atmosphere (Might not be an easily repeatable experiment in the UK however)
Just 1 more thing, the document itself is pretty good for high school. I dont remember touching Gantts and CAD until University so that experience in itself is probably going to be very useful when you hit major projects in your further studies. The failure here is going to help you succeed later. I was in a similar position in high school, I wanted to participate in the solar car challenge, however I couldn't motivate any other students to try or the school to invest in it. Everyone was more afraid of failing and "wasting time" when they should have seen exactly how educational even a failure would be.
Yeah, I can definitely relate. Fortunately, we had a team who was kind of interested at the start, so we could work from there. To be honest, I've learned so much from this, it's definitly worth the time I put in.
I quickly read through and found it fascinating.
I'm not sure I've heard anyone say that before. Documentation is usually considered a necessary evil.
Regionals are happening around the UK right now. There are equivalent competitions in the USA, France and Japan. The best teams get to compete at the Farnborough or Paris Airshow, which is an incredible experience.
Interesting that the largest section of the report is the last one called "Social Media outreach" to justify their choices.
Also, to be fair, we didn't quite build the rocket, we just built the probe.