Ancient Dagger Up to 2.5k Years Old W Stars/Moons/Geometric Patterns Unearthed
144 points
4 months ago
| 12 comments
| smithsonianmag.com
| HN
Zobat
4 months ago
[-]
A while ago there was a necklace discovered in Sweden [1], thought to be about 2000 years old it made international headlines. Then it made headlines again when analysis revealed it was a fake.

Not saying this knife will turn out to be a fake but seeing "Experts will soon conduct a metallurgical analysis" makes me just that little bit hesitant.

1) https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/vast/unikt-jarnaldershalsb...

reply
unwind
4 months ago
[-]
We also have "the moped ring" [1], an 800-gram gold+silver necklace from 500 AD that some kid clipped a piece off to fix their moped. :)

This is on display at the Historical Museum in Stockholm, which has a fancy vault-like "Gold room" [2] showing off lots of found treasures. Recommended.

[1]: https://historiska.se/upptack-historien/artikel/ostra-hoby-h...

[2]: https://historiska.se/utstallningar/the-gold-room/

reply
relistan
4 months ago
[-]
This guy already found another big deal find that was legit, a papal bull. They are part of a historical preservation group. I think you can bet on it being real.
reply
torlok
4 months ago
[-]
Since the press in Poland wrote about this, I'll add a little context. According to the Muzeum Historii Ziemi Kamieńskiej's spokesperson, the knife is actually up to 3-2,8. They used the X-ray fluorescence method to come up with that number. The dating is being disputed, as it was rushed out after the discovery, and it's not like you can use carbon dating on metal. There's still chemical analysis to be done, but that doesn't give accurate results either. Some scientists point to the XVIII-XIX CE. Apparently some experts had a look at it and say it's from the Middle East, and if made of brass it could mean it's from I BCE, and it's been stylized to look ancient.
reply
verisimi
4 months ago
[-]
> the knife is actually up to 3-2,8

I'd be surprised if it was 3-2.8 years old.

> The dagger isn’t Ukowski’s first big discovery. Last year, he found a broken papal bull—a pope’s engraved lead seal—that may have been linked to Clement VI.

As you also say:

> it could mean it's from I BCE, and it's been stylized to look ancient.

reply
bb88
4 months ago
[-]
Reminds me of "Detectorists."

https://www.amazon.com/Detectorists-BBC-Series/dp/B06XC4TPTN

Here in the US, if you search along the roads, mostly you're just going to find trash.

reply
MyOutfitIsVague
4 months ago
[-]
It's really a beautiful little show. Quaint, funny, and warm-hearted without being cloying or saccharine. Manages some mild drama and even melodrama without feeling forced or annoying.

I still haven't watched the movie yet.

reply
seanhunter
4 months ago
[-]
Wholeheartedly agree, and the two leads, Toby Jones and Mackenzie Crook (who also is the writer) are both exceptional (both in this and elsewhere). Really worth checking out. Also fun fact: Diana Rigg who played Andy’s girlfriend’s mother was her mother in real life.
reply
verisimi
4 months ago
[-]
> Here in the US, if you search along the roads, mostly you're just going to find trash.

You too could find something amazing, if you prepare the ground you intend to detect.

reply
bb88
4 months ago
[-]
I think maybe a better approach I saw was to sweep and vacuum up NY City sidewalks for gemstones that have fallen out of people's jewelry.

It's similar to the idea of sweeping up the edges of high travelled roads looking for palladium. But I think the palladium recovered wasn't worth the effort. But the gem stones might be, even if they're tiny.

reply
numtel
4 months ago
[-]
Good journalist not saying "metal detectors found..." :P
reply
n1b0m
4 months ago
[-]
A real gem of a show and the theme song by Johnny Flynn is wonderful.
reply
astennumero
4 months ago
[-]
I have a question. Who gets to own the dagger? The museum? Or the people who found it? What the general law around finding things like this and ownership?
reply
mogrim
4 months ago
[-]
In the UK you have to declare the item, and local museums are then allowed to bid a fair market price for it, which you have to accept. This money would then be split equally between the person who discovered the item and the landowner. It works pretty well - there's an incentive to legally declare what you've found, as you'll get paid for it, and by doing so the archaeology is often preserved and the item doesn't just disappear into a private collection.

Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasure_Act_1996

reply
zelo
4 months ago
[-]
In Poland everything found in the ground belongs to the nation treasury (government) and performing excavation in order to look for things like this is illegal without specific permit. So if you find something you either stash it and don't talk about it or it goes to museums.
reply
animal531
4 months ago
[-]
The laws are usually highly regional for things like this.

In some places it belongs to the government, in others the nearest historical authority, in others to you and/or with conditions. In others like Ireland its illegal, so not too long ago someone found two bronze age axe heads and mailed them in anonymously, creating the problem that their National Museum needed to know where the items were found.

reply
butlike
4 months ago
[-]
It belongs in a museum! "So do you!"
reply
agos
4 months ago
[-]
it obviously depends on the laws of each country - in Italy, for example, if you happen to find underground an object of historical, artistic, or archeological value you have 24 hours to hand it to the authorities (cultural conservation institutions, municipal authorities or law enforcement). On the other hand, if you are using a metal detector you can't claim it's a random finding and you might incur in charges for abusive archaeological research. If the finding is indeed random you are entitled to a monetary prize by the state.

In other countries I would expect similar legislation

reply
lawlessone
4 months ago
[-]
In a lot of places you'll get in trouble for digging things up because a huge part of the archeology is the objects location , context etc.
reply
max_
4 months ago
[-]
Its so beautiful.

I wonder what alloy it was made of.

I am surprised it looks in such a good condition after 2,500 years buried in a lump of clay.

reply
linksnapzz
4 months ago
[-]
Looks like bronze.
reply
tommica
4 months ago
[-]
Simply an astonishing looking dagger.
reply
thunkle
4 months ago
[-]
How did they manage to pack so many video ads into a single article?
reply
Galatians4_16
4 months ago
[-]
reply
bawana
4 months ago
[-]
All i see is an nginx welcome page
reply
bookofjoe
4 months ago
[-]
What with their funding being slashed as we speak, look for way more!
reply
jajko
4 months ago
[-]
0 ads on Firefox with ublock origin
reply
thedudeabides5
4 months ago
[-]
what metal is it made of?
reply
addaon
4 months ago
[-]
Bronze.

Hallstatt was bronze age, and if it was an outlier like meteoric iron (a) it would look like it (corrosion) and (b) it would have been called out.

reply
marcusverus
4 months ago
[-]
This article is the first I've ever heard of the Hallstatt culture, but wow were they awesome. Check out this amazing bronze bucket from ~600 BC. It has rivets!

https://www.britannica.com/place/Hallstatt-archaeological-si...

reply
thaumasiotes
4 months ago
[-]
> Bronze.

> if it was an outlier like meteoric iron (a) it would look like it (corrosion)

It is corroded. That's why it's green.

Which, yes, means it's bronze, but note that it's being described as an "iron age dagger" and they think it was manufactured in southern Europe and traded to the north. Iron wouldn't be surprising.

reply
brcmthrowaway
4 months ago
[-]
Why do they never find ancient keys to houses?
reply
caradine
4 months ago
[-]
Doesn’t look very sharp. Pretty sure I’ve cut myself worse opening a can of soup. Call me when they find an ancient butter knife.
reply
khaki54
4 months ago
[-]
Imagine getting smoked by that thing! Pure class -- many worse ways to die.
reply
camjw
4 months ago
[-]
Let's be real this is almost certainly cursed.
reply