Applying that over an entire population for their entire life...a couple years diff sounds plausible
This is an interesting one. I was of the impression that HFCS is worse for you than sugar cane, but in the past when I've repeated that statement here, I've had people disagree with it.
But, I just found this meta-analysis – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9551185/ – which suggests an association between HFCS consumption and increased CRP (C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation)
A study (standard IN MICE disclaimer) suggesting that HFCS may contribute to NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease) and NASH (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) – https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/how-hig... – and NASH sometimes (not always) progresses to liver cirrhosis, plus it also significantly increases the risk of liver cancer. The proposed mechanism is that fructose causes greater injury to the intestinal lining than other sugars, and the injured intestinal lining allows more bacterial toxins into the liver, which causes liver injury.
We have to ask "earlier than who"?
Of course, the majority of Americans are descended from Europeans, but the American diet is significantly worse than most European countries, and the healthcare system is not as accessible. Americans lack the levels of exercise Europeans get, and a host of other factors.
The less wealthy in America die earlier than the wealthy, but being richer in America buys more years, but not more years than one would live if in Europe.
Like for Americans, at some point all of their ancestors significantly detached themselves from their place of origin and relocated. For e.g. Europe some people definitely did that but not all and maybe not even most?
I would expect Americans to have less of a familial social network in general, which could affect health and lifespan.
Hypothesis.
Rich in the US healthcare system suffer from overtreatment. Medical ads are allowed, marketing drugs and treatments to people who don't need them is a health risk. In the US doctors have much stronger incentives to overtreat. They can be sued much easier for not treating or giving medicines the patient wants, if something happens.
Good use of anti-depressants -- It's all hopeless there's no point to going on -> Eh, it's not so bad.
Questionable anti-depressant effect -- "Your diabetes is out of control" -> Eh, it's not so bad. Why worry?