Changing behaviour of people, en masse is actually kind of difficult. You’d probably need to actually hire behaviour analysts/other behaviour experts to affect the kind of change you’re hoping for, which really… if you need to go to those lengths to get people to use your product, your product is shit. Fail fast and then start again.

I would not recommend the works by Jonah Berger that also deal with the same topic, because they are primarily based on marketing observations that are often shallow and misleading. For example, the misinterpretation of the “influencer” phenomenon, whereby he concludes that people who gain a following and become popular online actually help shape behavior. That is often, as we now know, only a fleeting phenomenon more akin to a lottery than anything that drives actual change.

When you really study the ways in which big products like say, Twitter, blew up, you see that they started with a small group of people who loved them. By the time the “influencers” picked up, the product already had a dedicated audience that made it feel “safe” for the popular person to promote them.

Anyway, I hope you enjoy Centola’s work if you check it out. And good luck!

Slack is my favorite example. It looked like chat. It had a hash, like IRC channels did. But it was actually email! It cut down back and forth in email. You can just give someone an emoji callback instead of emailing them, "Noted." You can send documents. You have a history of conversations and it was easy to CC the boss if someone didn't cooperate. People no longer spent the whole day replying emails.

Or Amazon. Instead of selling everything online, they started with books. Books were annoying to buy and easy to "ship".

A modern example might be Cursor. People already use VSC. They kept the exact same interface, added a few extra features, and end up selling agents. There's lots of agents out there which are great like Aider, but many are too far from someone's workflow.

Most of these are in the form of "create a channel people use, then sell things down that channel".

Where's the value then? Is it in your product, or in the user's new behavior?

New people who don't have built in patterns learn something better.

Locked in people stop doing the old thing because they're dead.

Eventually the new replaces the old. Its why its so important we don't let one of those startups "cure" aging or locked in feedback loops won't ever terminate. Also why events like COVID are so damaging, a whole tranche of new users learned maladaptive patterns.

Can you make the transition easier? Is there a middleground?

People like sugar, and the effects of that are well understood, yet we still eat it (some in more moderation than others) because, well, it tastes good.

Behavior can be a habitual. It can be hormonal or chemical. You might get a few people to change a habit - but you've got no chance with the others.

You might get one person to change, but if your product requires a group, ie social behavior, you've got no chance.

It's good that you recognize that behavior needs to change. It's good that you understand this will be the hardest part of the problem.

I'm not optimistic- but it is possible IF (very big if) the payback to the user is high.

Good luck.

If the perceived value for the behavior change is marginal, there’s no trick or tip that will make people change.

If the perceived value is high, you don’t need a tip or trick…other than to create the perception of high value.

It is worth noting that perceived risk is a massive factor. Price is marginal value for a B2B offering that requires changing accounting behavior. For consumers, price might be the biggest risk.

So why are your potential users resistant to changing behavior? Ask them and solve their actual problems. Good luck.

   Please don't use HN primarily for promotion.