I welcome PRs to add additional sending providers - it wouldn't be onerous.
Who's the relatively better provider now?
Edit: A useful article about IP Warm up https://blog.healthchecks.io/2023/08/notes-on-self-hosted-tr...
Of course, tech bros don't want you to do it, as it reduces their vendor lock-in.
Really I was just concerned about configuration overload from too many options. Seems like SMTP is worth splitting out, though.
Solution is:
* SMTP by default
* if you want, some setup examples of using third-party mail services using their SMTP endpoint (most offer one)
Again you don't have to, it's an open-source project and you owe nothing to anyone. But if you fancy doing it, this is the way to go and will save headaches later.
SES is terrible in the past but now it is at least on-par if not better than postmark.
Only issue with SES is setup can be tedious.
Indeed it is so performance sensitive, that it has blocked my region. Would it not be better to get a static site generator from a standard Markdown posts, and thus assure it is both performant and accessible?
My hosting setup is . . peculiar: https://www.contraption.co/a-mini-data-center/