Tell HN: macOS Time Machine will no longer support Time Capsules
15 points
21 hours ago
| 3 comments
| HN
To my shock and anger, I just upgraded to macOS Sequoia 15.6 today and when I triggered a Time Machine backup was greeted with:

"Future versions of macOS will no longer support Time Capsule disks for Time Machine backups."

What? Why? My 2TB Time Capsule is still working fine, what could possibly be the justification for this change?

runjake
3 hours ago
[-]
Apple has three basic support categories: Supported, Vintage, & Obsolete. These are based on the last production dates of their respective products. It has been this way for a very long time.

Supported = 0-5 years

Vintage = 5-7 years

Obsolete = 7 or more years

If you buy any more Apple products, keep this in mind for product lifecycles. I will point out that Apple generally tends to be more generous than its competitors on support.

If you are not OK with this, reconsider your purchases. In cases like this, consider choosing products and workflows that use more open standards that are less likely to vanish.

More here: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102772

reply
Fade_Dance
20 hours ago
[-]
This has been Apple's way since times of yore.

This has a parallel to the late 90s when Apple dropped floppy disk support when it was still very much mainstream. Even the Apple II to Macintosh transition was abrupt and alienating to some in the ecosystem.

The justification is:

It makes supporting the new features and devices easier, as it focuses resources, at the expense of legacy support.

You, as an Apple ecosystem participant, pay up for the "Apple Tax" (again, a term that has been around for decades).

Just because. Any myriad of reasons could have spurred the change, from internal team tech talent reshufflings to whims in the marketing department.

This is how Apple is, and how Apple has been for much of their existence. The anger can probably be justified, but you definitely shouldn't be shocked.

May I suggest you pay for the higher tier cloud backup service on a monthly basis. Apple didn't get to a multi trillion dollar valuation out of good will exclusively. I hear service revenue is a major priority internally...

reply
nodesocket
20 hours ago
[-]
Lucky the timing is good, I just ordered a bunch of parts to build a new TrueNAS 5 bay 3.5" server. I'll guess I'll just point Time Machine at it.
reply
downrightmike
20 hours ago
[-]
Honestly, this is probably just to push icloud backup. Why sell one time capsule, when you can sell a service that never stops being charged for?

Floppies were terrible, but time capsules aren't that.

IRL a $Trillion dollar company can certainly have resources make the minuscule updates to keep support.

reply
McAlpine5892
18 hours ago
[-]
> a $Trillion dollar company can certainly have resources

You would think, but look at this whole Liquid Glass thing - they can't get something simple like contrast right. On the other hand, they arguably put out the best consumer chips in the industry.

Seems dysfunctional, like every other large corp.

reply
nodesocket
19 hours ago
[-]
Time Machine does not support backing up to iCloud though. Maybe it's coming.
reply
downrightmike
19 hours ago
[-]
Makes sense to warn people now and then sell a solution to the problem they made
reply
hammyhavoc
6 hours ago
[-]
https://support.apple.com/en-gb/104170

Probably ongoing support. It was no iPhone in terms of units sold.

reply