VLT observations of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS II
46 points
7 hours ago
| 5 comments
| arxiv.org
| HN
rbanffy
4 hours ago
[-]
We really need to be able to launch a sample return mission to interstellar objects. There’s much unique chemistry to be uncovered.
reply
reenorap
6 hours ago
[-]
An article said this is the 3rd interstellar object detected. Are we detecting more interstellar visitors because they are getting more common, or have our techniques improved over the last few years?
reply
synapsomorphy
6 hours ago
[-]
Entirely the second. When Vera Rubin starts reporting its regular scans this will be made very clear because we'll probably find 10+ interstellar objects per year at minimum.
reply
hnuser123456
5 hours ago
[-]
These things are only a mile or two wide and at the distance of Jupiter. They require extremely sensitive and high-resolution telescopes to detect. There are probably many more of them that are smaller and further.
reply
gus_massa
6 hours ago
[-]
We launched a new telescope, in 2017 IIRC, that can detect them.
reply
aardvark179
6 hours ago
[-]
Our techniques have improved.
reply
galacticaactual
1 hour ago
[-]
So how is it that nickel is present on this thing with zero corresponding iron?
reply
briffid
6 hours ago
[-]
So is it a spaceship or not?
reply
LeoPanthera
5 hours ago
[-]
It is never aliens.
reply
rbanffy
4 hours ago
[-]
Until it is. ;-)
reply
rdtsc
6 hours ago
[-]
Why would do think it would be a spaceship?
reply
lucky_cloud
5 hours ago
[-]
I doubt they're serious but some wackos thought Oumuamua was an alien probe due to its unusual shape, and since this new interstellar object is arriving shortly after Oumuamua has left it must be the mothership.

I feel like it's more of a meme than a serious thing for most people.

reply
chatmasta
4 hours ago
[-]
It wasn’t a wacko theory at first. The wackos are the people who still believed it even after evidence emerged to the contrary.
reply
rbanffy
4 hours ago
[-]
There are many more rocks in our own solar system than there are interstellar spacecraft. Assuming similar proportions elsewhere makes us conclude it’s never aliens.
reply
Bjartr
2 hours ago
[-]
Heuristcs that almost always work are right up until they're not.

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/heuristics-that-almost-alwa...

reply
andyjohnson0
4 hours ago
[-]
The Ramans do everything in threes.
reply
exe34
4 hours ago
[-]
I'm looking forward to the braking!
reply
rbanffy
4 hours ago
[-]
The books, unfortunately, didn’t stop on the first.
reply
holoduke
4 hours ago
[-]
I am getting bombarded with yt videos about this object being half the size of the sun passing our system with the planets aligned in a 0.01% chance perfect geometry etc etc. millions of views. It's incredible what people believe these days. Not a grain of skepticism.
reply
rbanffy
4 hours ago
[-]
Science teachers have failed their students.
reply
ojosilva
2 hours ago
[-]
I think the number of wacky believers hasn't changed that much. It's just that now the countless outlets and algorithms venting this nonsense have ballooned to galactic proportions! My dad used to buy these 70/80s UFO magazines back in the day and they were just as nutty.
reply
dylan604
3 hours ago
[-]
Do all of the views necessarily translate 1:1 to the number of people that believe it? Some people watch just to see what kooky nonsense people are falling for.
reply
JPLeRouzic
6 hours ago
[-]
This is a report about the volatile composition of interstellar objects (ISOs) passing through the Solar System.
reply
tiahura
6 hours ago
[-]
So telescopes can see nickel being spread at .125g/mile from 200M miles away?
reply
dekhn
4 hours ago
[-]
Yes, in this case the telescope (array) is composed of many elements. The scopes themselves are very sensitive (so they can detect minute amounts of photons) and the combined array gives a much higher resolution (ability to see things that are very small very far away).

astronomy technology has been improving rapidly and the VLT is one of the best implementations for this kind of problem right now.

reply
gus_massa
6 hours ago
[-]
An easy home experiment is to get a gas flame, like in the stovetop that is blue and sprink a little of table salt. The important part is the sodium that gives the flame a very strong yellow color.

Salts without sodium give other colors. IIRC cooper gives a green color. This is used by firecrackers makers to get nice colors, and also in the chemistry lab to detect the composition of some salts.

After studding this king of stuff for a few centuries, we have a very good idea of how each element changes the color of the flame, or absorbs some colors of the light that pass trough the mist.

reply
beefnugs
50 minutes ago
[-]
I can't wait until RFKjr knows which colored salts to inject into child's brains to read the flame colors of autisms!
reply
JPLeRouzic
6 hours ago
[-]
I have a 135-year-old book by Camille Flammarion that explains how astronomers were able to analyze the content of stars with spectroscopy.
reply
dylan604
6 hours ago
[-]
reply
StableAlkyne
6 hours ago
[-]
In the same sense that a weather radar can "see" mist dozens of miles away, yes

There is so much more information available in the electromagnetic spectrum than just the narrow range a human eye can see

reply
exe34
5 hours ago
[-]
my favourite today was this one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00224...

measuring pressure with line broadening!?!

reply
DoctorOetker
2 hours ago
[-]
for example, the element Helium (which had been presumed to exist as a missing gap in the Aufbau model, but at the time not yet discovered) was first discovered not on Earth... but in the Sun! Spectroscopy confirmed the predicted spectrum. Once The element was confirmed to exist on the sun, they started looking for it on Earth and eventually found it on Earth as well.
reply