Should We Drain the Everglades?
62 points
4 hours ago
| 20 comments
| rabbitcavern.substack.com
| HN
Cheer2171
3 hours ago
[-]
Halfway in I realized the author is just narrating the Wikipedia article. If you'd rather just read it without the attempts to be funny: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draining_and_development_of_th...
reply
ksymph
3 hours ago
[-]
Wish I noticed before submitting, I would have just shared that instead. Oh well. Thanks.
reply
ElijahLynn
2 hours ago
[-]
the comedy was what got me through it, probably wouldn't have read the Wikipedia article, fwiw.
reply
zem
2 hours ago
[-]
I enjoyed the author's style, personally
reply
hitekker
1 hour ago
[-]
In addition, it feels like the author asked an AI to do the narration for him. He made some edits here and there but the humor feels off.
reply
hwc
28 minutes ago
[-]
I used to live in this part of the country. There's an insane amount of disregard for the environment and climate. Yes, new buildings have to be reinforced against hurricanes. But they are still building new houses only a few meters above sea level, as if sea level rise wasn't already unavoidable.

And on the largest scale, there is a limit to the amount of fresh groundwater that wells along the South Florida coast can get. Once they exceed that amount, they'll be pumping brackish water seeping in from the ocean. Then they have to desalinate the brackish water.

But the last time I was there, they were still building new houses.

reply
JohnDeHope
3 hours ago
[-]
As a Pasco county alumni, I think we should drop the people who want to drain the everglades off in the everglades and leave them in there until they gain an appreciation for the scenery.
reply
ecocentrik
3 hours ago
[-]
Do we really want to introduce more invasive species into the Everglades?
reply
clickety_clack
1 hour ago
[-]
The Everglades will continue until morale improves!
reply
cwmoore
42 minutes ago
[-]
Isn't that "The Pasco Promise"?
reply
bdamm
3 hours ago
[-]
Or until they become lunch?
reply
dfltr
3 hours ago
[-]
Until the scenery gains an appreciation for them, you might say.
reply
potato3732842
55 minutes ago
[-]
We ought to balance it out by doing something comparable to the people who simp for heavy handed regulations in areas that have already been build up and altered greatly by humans.
reply
ortusdux
3 hours ago
[-]
Speaking of the uncanny feeling of shallow water, there are parts of the Florida keys where you can paddle a kayak a good half a mile from shore and still be in 2-4 ft of water. It's a great place to learn a new watersport as if you fall in you can just stand up.
reply
Rendello
3 hours ago
[-]
Leeches freak me out, I can't imagine swimming with (or falling on) the gators!
reply
stronglikedan
2 hours ago
[-]
The alligators are generally scared of people. It's the crocs that you got to worry about. (not really though - even they are quite timid, unlike their African counterparts)
reply
soperj
1 hour ago
[-]
Why? That's like being afraid of mosquitoes. You can't even really feel a leech.
reply
codingdave
53 minutes ago
[-]
Mosquitoes are the deadliest creature on the planet, to be fair.
reply
squigz
1 hour ago
[-]
Well GP didn't say they were afraid. I have pretty much the same reaction of being "freaked out" by leeches too. And while my reaction to mosquitoes is hardly the same, I'm going to avoid both if I possibly can, which seems entirely reasonable to me

Anyway you don't feel leeches coming off? That's surprising.

reply
throwaway5752
1 hour ago
[-]
> there are parts of the Florida keys

Then allow me to ease your mind. Leeches are not a problem in the marine environment of the Florida Keys, unless you are a turtle. They person you replied to changed the topic slightly from the Everglades, where they could be a problem. In either case I'd worry about midges and mosquitos first.

Similarly with alligators, they are primarily freshwater and uncommon in the keys. American crocodiles can tolerate the marine environment better, but they are threatened as a species and have just two confirmed attacks in 75 years.

So wear a personal flotation device and you should be okay.

reply
rcxdude
20 minutes ago
[-]
This reminds me of something much more local to me, which is similar but perhaps looking from the other direction in time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fens
reply
toomanyrichies
1 hour ago
[-]
The headline reminds me of the Mr. Show sketch about America blowing up the moon [1].

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTJ3LIA5LmA

reply
jason_s
2 hours ago
[-]
California's Central Valley would like a cautionary word....
reply
SilverElfin
1 hour ago
[-]
One thing I don’t understand is why so many appreciate the Everglades. To me a landscape infested with aggressive animals (gators) doesn’t sound attractive or safe. Between them and the invasive snakes I feel like you would need to be on guard all the time. Maybe drain it, replace it with different animals that are friendly, and then refill it. I’m only sort of joking.
reply
CGMthrowaway
1 hour ago
[-]
During the lockdown I canoed thru the everglades and camped on the islands as it was one of the only places open. It's a lot more than gators. I saw a family of dolphins teaching their child to swim and jump. The fishing is incredible. The gators arent the worst pest (the biting insects are). You can spot manatee. Of course it's a paradise for birds. And that way that mangroves ultimately create dry land from nothing is quite amazing.
reply
hunter-gatherer
29 seconds ago
[-]
You'd make a terrible wildlife biologist.
reply
ux266478
1 hour ago
[-]
Alligators are the exact opposite of aggressive. If you walk up and pat one on the head it'll probably just hiss and start slinking away at the speed of syrup. You should be more afraid of the spiders and blood-sucking insects.
reply
pharrington
1 hour ago
[-]
I'm way more afraid of the humans that want to drain and eradicate the native population of the Everglades!
reply
ux266478
1 hour ago
[-]
Even putting aside that it destroys incredible natural beauty for land that's not even productively useful, it astounds me that people still buy into major terraforming projects. Every single time it's had absolutely horrendous consequences often with millions of human deaths attached. Don't make large changes to chaotic systems!
reply
potato3732842
34 minutes ago
[-]
>Even putting aside that it destroys incredible natural beauty for land that's not even productively useful, it astounds me that people still buy into major terraforming projects. Every single time it's had absolutely horrendous consequences often with millions of human deaths attached. Don't make large changes to chaotic systems!

Ah, yes, terrible consequences, such as, the irrigation and suitability for farmland of central California, the lack of frequent flooding of the Mississippi river and tributaries and the present dryness of the Netherlands.

I don't think draining the everglades is tractable and I think it's more valuable as is since you're not gonna out farm the midwest. But it's really easy to be on a high horse and not appreciate the successful projects that we benefit from the results of.

reply
jonstewart
13 minutes ago
[-]
It does not take much familiarity with the history of Mississippi flood control and the Army Corps of Engineers to realize how risky, fraught, and short-sighted the whole project has been. The delta's dying and the Old River Control Structure is one bad day away from diverting the entire river to the Atchafalaya.

_The Great River_ by Boyce Upholt from last year is a good place to start learning about the Mississippi.

reply
downut
12 minutes ago
[-]
I do not think that a 12' gator is going to appreciate you patting it on the head. And for short distances, they can outrun a human. That said I am a 3rd generation S. Floridian who grew up 50 years ago swimming and water skiing in the canals along what was then two-lane Highway 84, out west of Plantation, nothing much else there. Never had a problem, but the big ones got shot, officially or not.

Fun story: I was slaloming bank to bank down that canal and wiped out. The canal is narrow enough the boat has to slow down and idle around the u-turn to then plane up to get back, so it takes a bit. There was a high arched water pipe over the canal and a kid parked on the apex. Kid sez, there's a gator next to you. I said, sure, right kid. Kid sez, there's a gator next to you... and I look and yep, maybe a 6', 7' gator about 10' away. Well... not much to do... I started waving the ski and a couple of minutes later they throw me the rope and I orientated and up and away I went. ha haha. Good times. I think I was 15.

Another one: Buddy of mine is on two skis and is kinda mellowing out just running down that same canal and I'm driving and see a gator ahead in the middle of the canal, and why not, I steer around the gator and then steer him right over it and it explodes in a huge splash ha aha haar I am just laughing at the memory and he looks back and then back at me with a big shit eating grin. I was probably 16.

Same canal: I got this hot gf I'm trying to teach to ski and she's fiddling with the skis, as you do starting out, and a nice 5' tarpon rolls about 6' away from her. Panic! We're like no no no they do not bite, it's just a tarpon, they're friendlies! Oh well, no water skiing for her. I was... 17.

But I'm not here to tell you these stories. I'm here to talk about the river of grass, the Everglades. Many millions have lived around the periphery but you can look at maps and see it's a long way across with "nothing" there. How would you see the vast scope of the interior, in an efficient way, right down at water level?

Family 2 doors over in Melaleuca Isles (still exists, I see) the father was the district superintendent (I think) for the Florida Fish & Game Commission, or whatever it's called these days. In those days the US was a normal country and everybody hung out, the kids, the parents. So I'm over there in the morning and he says want to go on patrol. I say sure. So we drive the airboat out to the launch point on 84 (Alligator Alley) and off we go. This thing had a Lycoming flat six and there's not much to the boat but the Al flat hull, the two tier seats, and the enormous engine and propeller. And for 5 hours, at speeds peaking at 100mph[1], we criss cross the entire sector of the Everglades north of Hghwy 84. I stopped counting deer in the sawgrass in the water at 100. The vistas were of an endless prairie of sawgrass. He drove across the hammocks where there was grass by just powering the boat onto the land and then over.

I came away from that experience with a full appreciation of the scope of the Everglades, the idea of it, and am sad that the idea of wilderness has softened like melting fat into an ideal of a warm cozy unthreatening warm bath. There is nothing that can be accurately described as wilderness unless organisms endemic there are present and may be out to eat you. Starting with mosquitos and ending with alligators.

[1] In those medieval times we did not know nor understand the term "eye protection" and so I had none, though my neighbor did. He didn't care. At 100mph your face is quite distorted. Some debris is getting through the screen on the front of the boat. What a MF adventure.

reply
jason-phillips
1 hour ago
[-]
I used to swim with alligators in the bayou when I was a kid in the 1980s. They're not so bad.
reply
Dilettante_
1 hour ago
[-]
Amos Moses, is that you?
reply
selimthegrim
38 minutes ago
[-]
I nearly fell off my couch laughing in New Orleans reading that.
reply
hnuser123456
1 hour ago
[-]
It sounds like hurricanes keep it topped off. So then what, you design some poison to only attack gators, then find out later it poisons people too? Because draining it and then discovering that underground wells turn to saltwater isn't enough?
reply
soperj
1 hour ago
[-]
I feel the same way about Miami.
reply
rexpop
43 minutes ago
[-]
The perspective that nature, including the Everglades, should be "attractive or safe" for human convenience is profoundly misguided and chauvinistic. Nature does not exist for humanity's comfort or aesthetic preferences—its value and purpose are independent of human desires or perceptions. The Everglades is a complex, irreplaceable ecosystem essential for biodiversity, climate regulation, water filtration, and flood control. It hosts countless species found nowhere else on Earth, including apex predators like alligators, which are critical to the ecological balance.

To suggest draining such a vital natural landscape and replacing its inhabitants with "friendly" animals ignores the intricate interdependencies that sustain these ecosystems. This not only threatens extinction of unique species but undermines the health of the entire region, affecting millions of people who rely on its ecosystem services. Demanding nature conform to a sanitized or human-safe version reflects a narrow, anthropocentric arrogance.

The wildness of the Everglades is part of its profound purpose and beauty. Any view that diminishes this is reductive, environmentally ignorant, and ethically troubling. Nature is not a backdrop to human desires but a living system demanding protection, understanding, and awe.

reply
inglor_cz
3 hours ago
[-]
Once upon a time, draining wetlands was the only somewhat efficient way to reduce malaria. That made sense, given the drop in mortality. Lots of places in Italy, for example, are ex-swamps.
reply
darkerside
26 minutes ago
[-]
If it's so shallow, it seems like draining it would have little impact on flood risk
reply
neilv
3 hours ago
[-]
I've heard the theory that humor is actually a censor mechanism, to inhibit learning nonsense.

So, IIUC, if the censor identifies something nonsensical, it throws the amusement switch, to keep your brain from integrating the wrong thing.

While we might think that the presentations of fact in the article are informative, the humor-saturated prose could be a good way to cloud any thinking about the topic.

Does this mean it's OK to mention expanding the Florida Everglades? One could plan out a path of bulldozing, excavation, and flood fills, given an existing map of gerrymandering for national elections.

reply
howard941
1 hour ago
[-]
Sea level rise will finish the 'glades.
reply
p1necone
59 minutes ago
[-]
The only people I trust to fuck with wetlands without finding out are the Dutch, and even then I suspect the find out part is still due shortly after they vote some populist politician in asking why they're spending all those taxpayer dollars maintaining dykes and water infrastructure when there's not even any water here?
reply
scythe
1 hour ago
[-]
>Did this giant dike work? Did the 143 miles of dikes work? Let’s see what Wikipedia says:

>>The enlarged water control structures around Lake Okeechobee and in the Everglades did not prevent either frequent floods or dry spells in which cattle died for lack of water and fires burned in the peat of the Everglades.

>So yeah, that’s a no. A big ol’ drought (technical term) ensued!

This is a good example of how a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. We actually do know that the Hoover Dike worked: it survived Hurricanes Andrew, Francis, Wilma, Milton, and several others I probably forgot to mention.

reply
bandyaboot
2 hours ago
[-]
> Hopefully nothing that advances a dystopian fascist agenda, right? Right?

Hey! You can’t say that! That’s wrong speak!

reply
cramcgrab
2 hours ago
[-]
Fresh water = bad
reply
yesbut
3 hours ago
[-]
no
reply
mrbluecoat
2 hours ago
[-]
> 5x the size of JFK (the airport, not the person)

lol

reply
aaronbwebber
3 hours ago
[-]
betteridge's law of headlines still undefeated
reply
bee_rider
2 hours ago
[-]
Bit of a layup for it in this case.
reply
Meph504
3 hours ago
[-]
what an odd clickbait type article, it goes over the history of people who previously wanted to do this. But mention there is no current effort to do so, and asking the question is irrelevant.
reply