Can't we just live as we are and not aim for some ideal only reachable through the use of synthetic substances?
What is commonplace today would be considered synthetic decades ago. Look at the breed of plants we grow, animals we raise, and staple foods (cheese) we eat.
Even then, many would extend the unease I expressed to include some of the things you mentioned too.
> Can't we just live as we are and not aim for some ideal only reachable through the use of synthetic substances?
Insulated housing is a synthetic substance. I rather enjoy living with it.
Oh and cooked food. Huge advantage there.
All grains we eat are highly processed.
Even beef is dry aged.
Cheeses are processed as hell, just we use cultivated bacteria to do the work for us.
> people do just fine without any of that.
Tell that to someone who is vitamin B deficient.
Choline supplements are a huge help for the elderly, just across the board (with the exception of some people who do really bad with choline!)
I also understand the discomfort with the culture of “optimize everything” and constant self-experimentation. Supplements like creatine get framed as steps toward some perfect, engineered version of ourselves, and that framing feels like a hangover of eugenics thinking. It causes an acute, if subconscious, aversion that can manifest in the cool dismal of your parent's comment.
That unease matters. Maybe if we were more objective we would say it should not matter, but it does. And, while I often just ignore it, I am not sure I want to fully let go of it yet.
I know I've seen _major_ life improvements with the addition of a few key supplements.
(Yes, most insulin is now synthetic).