What can be said?
https://ember-energy.org/data/china-cleantech-exports-data-e...
https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/china-energy-transi...
https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/china-is-quietly-saving-the-wo...
https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/08/21/china-clean-renewable-e...
You also have to make carbon uneconomical. China's CO2 emissions have continued to increase rapidly along with renewables.
Energy is really useful and we don't have enough to fulfil demand. Unless renewables + nuclear are cheaper than carbon and not supply constrained I'd expect both sources to increase in tandem.
Enough sunlight falls on Earth in ~30 min to power humanity for a year. There is currently a capture constraint, not a supply constraint, which is currently being solved for.
> Unless renewables + nuclear are cheaper than carbon and not supply constrained I'd expect both sources to increase in tandem.
Renewables are cheaper than carbon, even when accounting for storage, unsubsidized. Some will say "what about seasonal!?" Not solved for yet; fossil gas for the gaps until solar, wind, transmission, batteries, and demand response/orchestration keep closing that gap. Nuclear will never be cheap unfortunately.
https://ember-energy.org/latest-updates/24-hour-solar-now-ec...
https://www.surrey.ac.uk/news/solar-energy-now-worlds-cheape...
https://www.authorea.com/users/960972/articles/1329770-solar... | https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175647950.09188768/v1
(think in systems)
We may at some point cross the cost curve and I hope we do but not obvious we are there yet.
Is that based on the entire surface of the earth, or just dry land?
> or just dry land?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_solar
https://www.rwe.com/en/research-and-development/solar-energy...
https://www.nrel.gov/news/detail/press/2025/floating-solar-p...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/long-popular-in-asia-fl...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212...
https://time.com/china-massive-floating-solar-field/
https://theelectricityhub.com/seychelles-launches-floating-s...
China's emissions fell 2.7% this year. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45108292 Not per-capita emissions, total emissions.
Per annum total global coal use has peaked and is projected to fall from this year forward.
China's use is becoming "better" (closing many small dirty old coal power stations, opening fewer but larger and more efficient less polluting new ones) while having a set long term plan to phase out coal while using it now to power a transition to renewables (wind turbines and solar panels don't make themselves yet, nor do they yet power their own production).
I can't help but read "we're going to produce and consume more than ever" and I really don't see how it ends in a good way...
Take transportation alone, 1.3 billion ICE vehicles to replace by EVs, there is nothing green about that. Not even talking about the absolutely massive mining operations we'll need to build solar and batteries. What about cement? Steel? Petrol derivate chemistry, medicine, fertilizers,...
And then what? We continue building and consuming more and more shit forever? Who believes this can be "net zero"?
If that's truly how it'll go we don't even need EVs and renewable to attain equilibrium. But something tells me we'll manage to fuck it up somehow
Less than we need for fossil fuels though.
If you care about America using carbon-light power you should throw your weight behind nuclear, geothermal, and some wind/solar/battery manufactured domestically, by allies, or within our sphere of influence.
Sure, they are starting from a high number as the worlds manufacturer, but they're are clearly making strides that the other major industrial nations (the US) are not.
It's time to own up to the fact that China is going out of their way to use renewables, and the U. S. is actively sabotaging renewable energy programs. Whining about China is starting to look pretty silly.
Until not long ago, they very likely even processed your own trash.
* "FERC: Solar + wind made up 91% of new US power generating capacity in H1 2025" [1] - The rollback of the IRA will reduce the speed of the US transition.
* "Solar and wind growth exceeded global demand growth in the first half of 2025" [2]
* Perovskite solar panels could lead to even lower solar costs [3]
There's also increased investment in nuclear, exicting geothermal advances (eg. Fervo Energy), increasing EV sales, a massive expansion of battery storage, zero emissions concrete (https://sublime-systems.com/). There are lots of positive developments, so I'd recommend learning more about them to offset your current fears and introduce some hope.
1. https://electrek.co/2025/09/03/ferc-solar-wind-91-percent-ne...
2. https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-...
3. https://www.ft.com/content/a5095373-1762-41cd-a078-af533e264...
> AI can gave you a more exhaustive list
...so maybe it should not?
In relation to electricity this is not the case for H1 2025, as shown in the article "Solar and wind growth exceeded global demand growth in the first half of 2025" [1]
> ...so maybe it should not?
Fair point.
1. https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-...