Trade Chaos Causes Businesses to Rethink Their Relationship with the U.S.
43 points
1 hour ago
| 6 comments
| nytimes.com
| HN
https://archive.is/km60Y
JKCalhoun
1 hour ago
[-]
The self-inflicted part is what really has left me reeling.

For Christmas wish lists, my daughters always have ways of surprising me with items from Africa retailers, Netherlands… I had to tell them this year to stick with U.S. only because of tariffs. I guess that's awesome for the U.S.?

(The political cartoon of Santa having to pay tariffs kind of draws itself at this point.)

reply
phantasmish
56 minutes ago
[-]
I’ve personally got an ever-growing list of clothing items to get when tariffs come down. No US equivalents, and I don’t need them, so they can wait.

Britain, Canada, and one Nordic country or another are getting some business within a few months of tariffs dropping, lol. Maybe also Spain or Portugal.

What really blows is watching great stuff come up used on EBay overseas and not being able to buy it. It’s used, FFS! Sometimes it’s even US-made, which is extra goofy.

reply
trollbridge
28 minutes ago
[-]
Perhaps the intended effect is to ultimately have more clothing items manufactured in the U.S., creating jobs that meet things like minimum wage.
reply
pnut
1 minute ago
[-]
Right, because that is a national emergency on the level of severity and immediacy of a foreign military invasion - which is the actual legal arguement put forward.
reply
alwayseasy
8 minutes ago
[-]
In a dark humor way, it is the intended effect by Trump but really, how many Americans dream of a sweatshop job? Reminds me of a famously documented conversation between Cohn and Trump during the first administration (Bob Woodward's book):

Cohn starts assembling every piece of economic data to try and convince Trump that American workers did not aspire to work in assembly factories. “See,” he says to Trump at one point, “the biggest leavers of jobs – people leaving voluntarily – is from manufacturing.” “I don’t get it,” replies Trump. Cohn soldiers on. “I can sit in a nice office with air conditioning and a desk, or I can stand on my feet eight hours a day. Which one would you rather do for the same pay?” Trump still wasn’t buying it. Eventually, exasperated, Cohn simply asks Trump: “Why do you have these views?” “I just do,” Trump replies. “I’ve had these views for 30 years.” “That doesn’t mean they’re right,” says Cohn. “I had the view for 15 years I could play professional football.”

https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/the-best-fights-betwee...

reply
Esophagus4
4 minutes ago
[-]
Well this seems like a fun read about a guy telling Trump, “just shut the fuck up and listen.”
reply
idle_zealot
21 minutes ago
[-]
That means either a) making all clothes way more expensive for Americans, as our standards for labor and compensation are high compared to less developed countries, or b) lowering the standard of living in America such that we're forced to accept less pay for more labor.
reply
kasey_junk
24 minutes ago
[-]
You’d need a long term stable tariff regime for the investment required for that to happen.

The current administration has not proven itself to be stable. Even for their base they’ve walked back beneficial tariffs when the anticipated price increases happen (e.g. beef).

And that’s before you get into the constitutionality of their actions or how likely they are to be reversed with the next congress

reply
terminalshort
15 minutes ago
[-]
This is correct. But the main argument against tariffs in this comment section seems to be "Waaah! You can't make me pay more" which completely misses the point.
reply
rayiner
1 hour ago
[-]
So the tariffs had the intended effect? That’s great!
reply
supermatt
55 minutes ago
[-]
Is it great because the US will start manufacturing African and Dutch gifts? Or is it the reduced choice and inflated prices that you prefer?
reply
theultdev
44 minutes ago
[-]
People can pay a 10-20% premium for African and Dutch gifts if they want to.

Or shop American and help keep manufacturing and jobs alive here.

I think it's a fair compromise. As Americans we are used to having an overwhelming amount of choice, partly due to our previous open trade policies. Something you don't really see in other countries. Go to Japan and you can count the American products sold on your hand.

reply
tdeck
25 minutes ago
[-]
> Go to Japan and you can count the American products sold on your hand.

I'm living on Japan right now and this is absurd. There are American brands everywhere (although as usual who knows where the products are made). American food brands. American steak. American sportswear. American backpacks. Entire shops in the mall devoted to American fashion. I'd say appliances and cars are more rarely American brands but there are reasons beyond trade barriers why that's true.

reply
theultdev
11 minutes ago
[-]
Lived there for 6 years. You're not buying American steak, most likely it's Australian.

There are certain clothing brands (at a much higher cost), large fast food chains, and Apple are the exceptions. Basically really large companies that make specific deals.

reply
tdeck
6 minutes ago
[-]
Just checked my local grocery store circular, and as you can see (upper left) they sell American pork, at least. I believe I have bought American steak but it's not on sale at the moment.

https://www.seiyu.co.jp/assets/images/flyer_blackfriday25112...

reply
willvarfar
38 minutes ago
[-]
taking an example from the article, the USA currently produces 0.2% of coffee it consumes domestically (Hawaii and Puerto Rico).

Could coffee be grown in reasonable quantities inside the USA? I find some mention of very expensive high-end 'boutique' coffee grown in California but it is not generally a crop that grows well in the continental USA.

(until global warming reduces the chances of frost in Florida perhaps?)

Another example from the article was a tea grower. Again, niche growing is limited to just some regions of the USA, with less than 0.1% of consumption domestically produced.

And of course with these products they have distinctive tastes that reflect where they were grown, so tea from California is distinctive tasting and not a direct substitute for tea from Japan from the article.

The growers in the article had been heavily disrupted by tariffs.

reply
trollbridge
31 minutes ago
[-]
Yes, but American labour laws / minimum wages would result in it costing more.
reply
kasey_junk
23 minutes ago
[-]
Where are you growing coffee in the us, purely from a climate and land perspective?
reply
theultdev
29 minutes ago
[-]
That's a strawman. Obviously if there's no American competition then I see no problem with lower tariffs for those products.

I don't mind at all reducing tariffs for things we dont manufacture or can't for various reasons.

I believe the administration is lowering tariffs for things like that.

Beef on the other hand should be temporarily lowered since our cattle herd is half of what it should be. (It plummeted under Biden takes awhile to return as the herd matures) Soooo import from Argentina until it's back up.

reply
jstanley
37 minutes ago
[-]
That is not the reason that Japanese people don't buy many American products.

The reason is that there are hardly any products made in America.

reply
alextingle
30 minutes ago
[-]
I don't buy many American products because whenever I've tried in the past, the quality, and customer service has been shoddy. Americans can't assemble things correctly, ship wrong or obviously defective products, fail to fill in customs forms properly, and then expect me to just shrug my shoulders and accept all that rather than acknowledging issues and trying to fix them.

I realise that my experience is limited to the handful of times I've tried to buy stuff from the US. Perhaps I've just been very unlucky, but frankly, the odds are against it.

reply
jstanley
6 minutes ago
[-]
Your comment just reminded me, I bought a circuit board from the US recently and some of the pins were not soldered properly, I had to fix it myself.
reply
theultdev
33 minutes ago
[-]
It is. Japanese don't have the opportunity to buy most American products. You won't see them stocked or available apart from import stores where prices can be 2-3x the price they are in America due to import fees. Many items aren't even available there due to strict restrictions. Meanwhile America has been an open market for a long time.
reply
jstanley
4 minutes ago
[-]
My point isn't that American products aren't expensive to import into Japan (I don't know). My point is that even if they weren't expensive to import into Japan, what American products would you even import? Most stuff is not made in America in the first place.
reply
Filligree
35 minutes ago
[-]
Here in Ireland we have items from all over the world, except the US.

That’s not a new thing. It seems like you guys are the only ones whose goods aren’t interesting.

reply
arethuza
31 minutes ago
[-]
I'm struggling to think of what goods are made in the US that I might buy - certainly not food or cars?
reply
BeFlatXIII
32 minutes ago
[-]
I no longer care about my layabout countrymen.
reply
alistairSH
28 minutes ago
[-]
Or shop American and help keep manufacturing and jobs alive here.

Or you know, drive us into a recession. You do recall tariffs (Smoot-Hawley) were a contributing factor to the length and depth of the Great Depression, right?

reply
estearum
53 minutes ago
[-]
Depends on which "intended effect" you mean.

Which part of the mutually exclusive triangle of "add manufacturing" or "add revenue" or "reduce deficits" do you consider to be "the intended effect"?

reply
matwood
39 minutes ago
[-]
Intended effect of increased prices and less choice?
reply
terminalshort
35 minutes ago
[-]
Tariffs are not intended to benefit the consumer
reply
user982
32 minutes ago
[-]
Literally yes. "Tariffs on imports are designed to raise the price of imported goods to discourage consumption."
reply
BeFlatXIII
32 minutes ago
[-]
I'm hoping smuggling makes a major comeback.
reply
lazide
39 minutes ago
[-]
Or it can be like Brazil and everyone just pays 2x the cost for a large swath of things because there is no reasonable way that someone can make a competitive version of an iPhone - even with (in this case) 200 something million ‘captive’ customers.
reply
jeromegv
26 minutes ago
[-]
Yep, just visit a country that does a lot of high tariff stuff, like Brazil, Argentina. Yes they have strong local industries of very odd stuff sometimes, but on the other hand, they have people travelling outside the country to buy electronics because nothing is made locally.

If that's the model the US chooses, then i guess that's their choice.

reply
lazide
19 minutes ago
[-]
Democracy is the theory that the people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.
reply
waltbosz
1 hour ago
[-]
The other day over dinner I was speaking with a friend who works at a major international bank in the wire transfer department.

They mentioned that before the tariffs deadline, American businesses were rushing to make giant international orders. And since then, work had been slow for my friend.

reply
hypeatei
10 minutes ago
[-]
ITT: isolationists and idiots pretending this a 4D chess move for trade deals or reducing consumption. Show me the trade deals and promises made to reduce consumption. There are none, just pinky promises and Trump begrudgingly admitting your kids might get less toys this Christmas.

A mad king imposing tariffs (taxes) on a whim is not okay. Republicans control all three branches of government, they'd craft coherent policy if they wanted to bring back manufacturing to the US. Unserious and frankly stupid crowd of people who still support this government.

reply
mexicocitinluez
1 hour ago
[-]
Who would have thought that basing foreign trade policy on the whims of a man who has absolutely no clue how the world works would end up having a negative impact??

This is such an obviously self-inflicted wound it's maddening.

reply
rubin55
11 minutes ago
[-]
100% with you, but I don't think the presidential whims were the instigator for all this madness. That could be a Howard Lutnick:

The Man Behind Trump’s Tariffs Strategy: https://archive.is/llGGR

Update: fixed link

reply
alwayseasy
6 minutes ago
[-]
True on Lutnick but he is playing into Trump's deeply held belief (despite every data point saying the opposite) that Americans want manufacturing jobs.
reply
mooreds
1 hour ago
[-]
reply
brightball
1 hour ago
[-]
It’s certainly not ideal, but as one of if not the largest consumer in the world it does make sense as a negotiating point on trade deals.
reply
runako
50 minutes ago
[-]
The sticky part is we are also one of the largest producers in the world, and there is every reason to think that our producers will also take hits from our chaotic trade "policy."

(This is in addition to the fact that imposing big, likely-illegal, capricious taxes on Americans is a de facto reduction in the freedom of all American citizens. We are being deprived of our freedom to purchase what we want from wherever we want, and now it extends far beyond cheap Chinese EVs and into practically everything. People should understand the tariffs first as an assault on our personal liberties and only second as a business matter.)

reply
awinter-py
25 minutes ago
[-]
love to support domestic high-value manufacturing by creating an ever-changing and expensive regulatory scheme around low-value inputs
reply
terminalshort
21 minutes ago
[-]
> We are being deprived of our freedom to purchase what we want from wherever we want

Sorry, but that is not a freedom you have in the US or anywhere else on earth. Of course you are right that tariffs on intermediate goods hurt US producers, but your claim that your freedom is being assaulted is laughable.

reply
Eddy_Viscosity2
1 hour ago
[-]
Saying this makes sense in theory while wholey ignoring how it was carried in practice is a disingenuous attempt to defend the indefensible.
reply
rayiner
1 hour ago
[-]
True. But it’s also disingenuous to ignore the massive institutional momentum in favor of unrestricted trade? Throwing debris on the track may have been the only way to stop the train that was rolling on its own towards zero tariffs.
reply
pjc50
58 minutes ago
[-]
Zero tariffs are good! That's why the US put "no internal tariffs between states" in the constitution!
reply
eej71
27 minutes ago
[-]
I think this is an excellent point. Let's say they had NOT done that (and thank goodness they did) - would the current defenders of tarrifs see this as a path to wealth between states too? Me thinks they would. But they why stop there. Why not impose such tarrifs between cities. And if that enriches cities - neighbors should get in on the action too, no?

There is a modern Bastiat style essay waiting to be written here.

reply
lazide
38 minutes ago
[-]
They’re good as long as everyone is co-operating and has a common idea of ‘good’.

Notably, China, India, etc. still tax the every loving crap out of most imports in their jurisdiction (yes, tariffs!).

reply
renewiltord
35 minutes ago
[-]
I suppose by mimicking them we hope to bring the US to the standard of living that the Chinese and Indians have.
reply
lazide
18 minutes ago
[-]
Well, someone very well might - it’s not the common man though.

Notably, those in power in both countries live pretty cushy lives.

reply
Eddy_Viscosity2
52 minutes ago
[-]
Trump is using effectively unrestricted powers to impose tarriffs, there is no institional momentum in his way. He did not need to 'throw debris' anywhere.
reply
bmitc
1 hour ago
[-]
What are you talking about?

I can't buy anything overseas anymore. For example, used guitars from Japan used to have free shipping. It's now hundreds of dollars.

I can't buy my cat's medicine from Canada anymore, and the U S. distributor was already price gauging, as the American health system is wont to do.

How is any of this make sense? Nothing prompted this.

The American public got taxed while the rich got tax breaks, and his followers are lapping it up.

reply
terminalshort
28 minutes ago
[-]
I makes sense because you probably bought a US guitar instead. The goal of tariffs isn't to benefit you. If you want to argue on the merits, you can do that, but don't claim it doesn't make sense.
reply
alistairSH
18 minutes ago
[-]
Is that true though?

Cameras and bicycles are my two main hobbies. Essentially zero US production for either. Prices have gone up, but for no good reason - there's no US industry to protect.

Limited, highly-targeted tariffs can serve a purpose. But the blanket stuff we've seen this year make zero sense at a macroeconomic level.

reply
terminalshort
8 minutes ago
[-]
Yes, blanket tariffs are retarded. However, the point of the tariffs is that it is a national priority to develop a domestic industry. It is, of course, arguable that this national priority makes sense, but the fact that it makes your hobbies much more expensive is not at all relevant.

The Trump trade policy makes no sense and has been horribly executed on op of that, but I think that in the long run moving away from a policy of "as much cheap stuff for consumers as possible no matter the externalizes" will be a good thing.

reply
limaoscarjuliet
24 minutes ago
[-]
It is a double edged sword - the U.S. manufacturers no longer have to compete with potentially better products from overseas, they can push lower quality to the local market for the same price.
reply
terminalshort
18 minutes ago
[-]
This is correct. But this creates an opportunity for other domestic manufacturers to offer a better deal. Look at the Chinese car manufacturers. It was Chinese policy to say basically "sorry, you just have to buy shitty domestic cars or pay massive tariffs." Now their domestic manufacturers have gotten good enough that they are exporters themselves.
reply
lazide
36 minutes ago
[-]
The thing that prompted this is people fell for it, and he can use it as leverage to get rich.

That everyone was willing to stand by and let him do it (as in not apply real consequences or physically/procedurally actually stop him) is the opportunity that presented itself.

If a criminal suddenly walks by and steals your unlocked car (or breaks the window and steals it), and gets away, it’s a bit silly to stand there complaining you didn’t ask them to do that!

reply
estearum
1 hour ago
[-]
... the trade deals had already been agreed to...

Obviously deals expire and can be renegotiated, but what Trump has done is just said "deal is off just because I said so, even ones that I myself previously negotiated and signed!"

Do you like to do business with people who just shred your prior deals when they change their mind? It makes no sense.

reply