We deleted our Dockerfiles: a better, faster way to build container images
10 points
1 hour ago
| 3 comments
| rwx.com
| HN
isaacvando
41 minutes ago
[-]
We use jib at work (https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/jib) which also skips the Dockerfile and builds an image for a Java project directly.

This certainly looks like a much nicer experience than docker build, especially given that there can be a cache hit after a cache miss.

reply
joshuagvk
47 minutes ago
[-]
Really interested to give this a try. I haven't used RWX for CI yet (overall my builds wouldn't have benefited enough from the caching), but docker build times are definitely a pebble in my shoe
reply
d3Xt3r
26 minutes ago
[-]
Am I missing something or does rwx not have a free/self-hosted option?
reply
dan_manges
20 minutes ago
[-]
Hey! I'm one of the RWX cofounders. We don't have a self-hosted option yet, but we're interested in opening it up in the future. Our infrastructure is more complex to run than normal self-hosted runners infrastructure, due to extensive caching and provisioning optimizations.
reply