Airbus A320 Fly by wire corrupted by radiation in flight
40 points
1 hour ago
| 6 comments
| viewfromthewing.com
| HN
sxp
1 hour ago
[-]
The title sounds like speculative clickbait.

From https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-11-ai...:

  Analysis of a recent event involving an A320 Family aircraft has revealed that intense solar radiation may corrupt data critical to the functioning of flight controls.
This is different from the core claim that the incident was caused by radiation. What are the prior probabilities that the system was exposed to "intense radiation"? Vs some other mundane cause such as a faulty wire or mechanical issues? And what is the evidence supporting the former hypothesis?
reply
kevin_thibedeau
1 hour ago
[-]
> What are the prior probabilities

100% for electronics operating at altitude. Also on the ground, but we mostly act like it doesn't happen and are usually ignorant of the root cause when it does.

reply
RealityVoid
1 hour ago
[-]
100% of what? Those things have ECC and redundancy to the hilt. The data corruption odds are real and higher than one would expect but still not very high.
reply
belter
56 minutes ago
[-]
Look at pag 138...and correlation with altitude...: https://www.atsb.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/3532398/ao...
reply
RealityVoid
48 minutes ago
[-]
Yes, look at page 135 as well. They don't know, they have educated guesses. It could be SW, it could be hw.

EMI causing bugs is the equivalent of "bad juju".

reply
bgwalter
1 hour ago
[-]
The airworthiness directive replaces ELAC B L104 with ELAC B L103+, without giving a reason. Unless L103+ happens to have better shielding, it looks like another issue.
reply
userbinator
1 hour ago
[-]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-event_upset

Apparently it has happened to an Airbus once before.

reply
belter
1 hour ago
[-]
reply
JohannMac
1 hour ago
[-]
Caused uncommanded pitch down, could exceed structural integrity of aircraft. There are redundant units - unknown why this can happen given redundancy.
reply
mertd
1 hour ago
[-]
Also not very clear how they attributed the failure to solar radiation.
reply
RealityVoid
1 hour ago
[-]
In my humble opinion, whenever someone dropped the idea... "Maybe it's solar radiation" it never was solar radiation. There was a subtle bug in the system or something. It's just such a cop-out to attribute it to, solar radiation, it's our profession's variant of magic.
reply
belter
1 hour ago
[-]
These have specific error/data spike patterns. This document as of page 133 as good example of such investigation and conclusions: https://www.atsb.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/3532398/ao...
reply
RealityVoid
53 minutes ago
[-]
It's an interesting document, but I am unconvinced that data spikes mean environmental radiation driven data corruption. The fact that they have a certain pattern suggests it's not random.

They certainly do put a chapter with potential triggers down there, and it's a good take, you can't just discard the possibility. But above, they also have SW bugs as a potential trigger, so... Essentially, they don't know for sure yet.

reply
F7F7F7
1 hour ago
[-]
Presumably the same affected units are part of the redundancy package. The article essentially says as much.
reply
belter
1 hour ago
[-]
reply
bgwalter
1 hour ago
[-]
According to the airworthiness directive:

  Affected ELAC: Elevator aileron computer (ELAC) ELAC B L104

  Serviceable ELAC: ELAC B L103+
So it's a regression that affects decades old aircraft. Of course Airbus is now also meddling with "AI":

https://www.airbus.com/en/innovation/digital-transformation/...

Obviously there no direct connection here, but it seems that destabilizing perfectly working aircraft could be the product of a culture shift.

reply
lysace
1 hour ago
[-]
So the patch will be physical, I imagine.

("Apply this very expensive special tape from (e.g.) 3M here and here.")

reply
t0mas88
2 minutes ago
[-]
I've read the EASA emergency airworthiness directive, it's only a software change.
reply
SteveNuts
51 minutes ago
[-]
I believe most A320s can do OTA software updates (including dowgrades)
reply
ChrisArchitect
1 hour ago
[-]
reply