After 40 years of adventure games, Ron Gilbert pivots to outrunning Death
79 points
3 days ago
| 5 comments
| arstechnica.com
| HN
dbalatero
4 hours ago
[-]
This title freaked me out... I thought he was dying. Glad to hear it's just a new game!
reply
BLKNSLVR
3 hours ago
[-]
First I thought he was dying, then I thought he was committing all his resources into extending human life / reaching the singularity (like Kurzweil)

Then I read the article :)

reply
kentm
4 hours ago
[-]
He mentions living through the dialog fast and says that the takeaway is that people don’t care about the story. However, I wonder if his players just read very fast. I grew up on JRPGs and read through dialog quickly, to the point that people around me don’t believe that I could possibly be following the story. But that’s just how fast I can read game dialog.
reply
ACCount37
11 minutes ago
[-]
I've seen quite a few streamers that click through the dialog and don't care about the story.

It's even more common among playtesters. Ever noticed how some games seem to go out of their way to avoid any subtlety and repeat the major plot points at least 4 times? Or give way too many hints for the easiest of puzzles? One of the causes is that a game was playtested within an inch of its life.

Someone ended up optimizing a game for the kind of player who doesn't care much, because the playtesters were only there out of a job obligation.

But I've also seen a couple of streamers that can just scan entire pages into their mind in a second and click through text while retaining all the information.

I thought myself a quick reader, but even I was in a disbelief seeing someone read this quick on the first playthrough.

reply
vidarh
1 hour ago
[-]
I'm sure some do, but also I know some don't, because I typically don't. There are (rare) exceptions, but most game dialogue is predictable and boring, and so after the first couple of screens I will just hammer whichever button to skip the dialogue as fast as I can, repeatedly, until the dialogue is gone whenever it pops up.
reply
latexr
50 minutes ago
[-]
Fortunately, these days it seems more common that games highlight important pieces of information in the dialogue, so you at least get the important keywords.

I used to be very much into the story in video games, but at a certain point the overwhelming majority have become so generic and dull that I no longer bother. The biggest offenders are the ones who throw an insane amount of exposition at you before you even start playing. I remember one where I was pressing “A” furiously for minutes, with no way to skip, before anything even happened. I eventually quit the game and ended up returning it without experiencing any gameplay.

A great example of how to do this right is CrossCode. It throws you directly into the action and shows you “this is how the game is going to feel” from the get go. Then it pulls back and gives you the story and a tutorial before carrying on. It was super effective on me. Because in the first few minutes I immediately got a taste for what was to come and liked it, I became much more interested and patient in experiencing the story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CrossCode

reply
ACCount37
13 minutes ago
[-]
Yeah, exposition overload is a rookie mistake a lot of writers make.

And video game writers in particular? Sometimes it feels like just having a Wattpad account could put you in top 50% of them. I've seen AAAs where saying the writing was "fanfic tier" would be an insult to fanfics. Like they either hire the cheapest people they can get, or give the job to someone like an executive's daughter with big ideas and no ability to execute on them.

A good writer knows the power of "show don't tell", and knows the value of keeping the audience hungry and wanting for more.

reply
hyfgfh
3 hours ago
[-]
Two words: Disco Elysium

Maybe you need VA too

reply
acomjean
5 hours ago
[-]
His website is pretty fun.

https://grumpygamer.com/

He also blogged the development of tumbleweed park

https://blog.thimbleweedpark.com/archives.html

reply
N_Lens
4 hours ago
[-]
Thanks for sharing, his website has a nice vibe.
reply
szczepano
13 minutes ago
[-]
reply
HelloUsername
3 days ago
[-]
Ah, too bad to hear his upcoming game is cancelled!
reply
p2detar
3 hours ago
[-]
reply
abnercoimbre
5 hours ago
[-]
Do we know why it was?
reply
schnebbau
2 hours ago
[-]
He can't be trusted after fumbling the ending of Return to Monkey Island.
reply
donogh
1 hour ago
[-]
In his defence, Monkey Island is Ron’s creation and the ending is probably what he always intended. It felt like a fitting conclusion to me that neatly tied a bow on the whole saga.
reply
simpetre
13 minutes ago
[-]
He's also been creating absurdist controversial endings to adventure games for a long time before Return to Monkey Island (SoMI2, Thimbleweed Park)...
reply
kg
5 hours ago
[-]
The publishing and investment climate https://www.gamesindustry.biz/ron-gilbert-cancels-rpg-projec...

It's pretty tough getting a game funded right now.

reply
willmadden
4 hours ago
[-]
It's self-inflicted. The big studios are beyond terrible. The games are more about social conditioning than entertainment.

See Clair Obscur. They got funding from the State of France and the French National Centre for Cinema, and the game is 100x better than the slop the big studios publish.

reply
samiwami
3 hours ago
[-]
Social conditioning? Clair Obscur is good and was very unique, but is not 100x than “the slop big studios publish”.
reply
UpsideDownRide
3 hours ago
[-]
Infinity times better coukd be a better hyperbole, very goos game versus no good. Dividing by zero gets you infinity instead of just 100
reply
ido
3 hours ago
[-]
"Let's just all make Clair Obscur/Minecraft/Blue Prince" is not a repeatable strategy (every indie dev is trying to make good games). How much did it cost to make the Beatles' albums? A piano, drums, a couple of guitars and salaries for 4 guys? Why don't the big studios today with all their money just hire another Beatles?

Same reason why Ubisoft isn't just making another Balatro. Industrializing culture isn't (yet?) a solved problem.

reply
Supernaut
56 minutes ago
[-]
> How much did it cost to make the Beatles' albums? A piano, drums, a couple of guitars and salaries for 4 guys?

The Beatles did only take a few days to knock out each of their earliest LPs. However, per Wikipedia, "the group spent 700 hours on [Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band]. The final cost [...] was approximately £25,000 (equivalent to £573,000 in 2023)."

So, actually, envelope-pushing cultural landmarks typically do require a lot of effort and money to complete.

reply
recursivecaveat
2 hours ago
[-]
On the other hand I'm kind of shocked that the big gaming studios never seem to be fast followers. It feels like we've been through multiple waves of Balatro-likes from indie developers already. Where is the Ubisoft Lethal Company or something? You'd think having a studio full of experienced developers with tons of tech they could hop on trends quickly. It seems like they think it's beneath them or something though. Or maybe they're just structurally incapable of moving quickly. It did take 11 years and like 4 redesigns to make Skull & Bones after all.
reply
tikotus
41 minutes ago
[-]
This is a conjencture, even if I do work in the industry but not AAA, but: Following the trends simply isn't part of their business model. Following current trends is a very unpredictable business. Many try, and many fail. AAA had the luxury of somewhat predictable sales. They can make big bets like working years on a game, since they know they will have millions of players. And they know smaller studios can't compete with them in that business.

But, of course, making games is hard, and sometimes they fail. And now the free tools are getting really good, and smaller studios are becoming increasingly competent. Will we soon see the big ones fall? Their only way to survive is to keep going bigger, escaping the smaller studios to a place they can't reach. Now we have AAAA games. But is there a limit where players stop caring how many As a game has?

reply
ido
2 hours ago
[-]
The more people you add the slower you get, not faster. Large companies are nutorously slow moving (and particularly slow to change directions) vs small upstarts.
reply
baud147258
1 hour ago
[-]
yeah, but at this point it's weird they just don't grab a studio, give them a funding for 2 years and say them 'copy the latest indie trends with a tad more polish' and let them cook to see what comes out.
reply