▲londons_explore34 minutes ago
[-] I think code to implement http/1.1 in whatever software stack they use would have been shorter than the blog post...
reply▲stingraycharles1 minute ago
[-] I think you’re severely underestimating the complexity of http/1.1. It’s definitely much simpler than http/2, but it’s a lot of code that needs to be maintained.
reply▲probably not - it can be quite poorly defined in places and the edge cases can be very fiddly. by pushing for http/2 it encourages more users to pick it up imo
reply▲http/2 surely not simpler?
reply