They have ad hoc explanations for the divergences and try to make lemonade out of the lemons by claiming that their index reveals "higher-frequency fluctuations that traditional series smooth over" but I am willing to bet that if they had had to predict the divergences before doing the calculations they wouldn't have been able to.
I think this is probably mostly pareidolia.
Is the image we see today really what was initially drawn?
E.g. the famous night watch picture, which was larger and brighter.
The value of the index lies precisely where it converges with broad historical trends and where it diverges, suggesting new information. The observation that the color index frequently changes before GDP is a sign of its validity, not a weakness - e.g. shifting consumer demand/sentiment or supply chain shocks and a leading indicator of GDP
Whether there's a slight green tint, or a certain blue doesn't pop quite as much, doesn't seem like it would affect the findings.
I would vote to pursue film as the next medium. I would be interested in the predictive potential of your model.
I am not certain this model will teach us a lot but it certainly gets one to think independently which is desperately needed to maintain our humanity.
Thank you for sharing and publishing.
Wow!
i mean, it's so natural, no? Yin Yang and stuff, like common sense type of things.