Australia's social media ban in chaos as youths flock to Chinese alternatives
17 points
19 hours ago
| 5 comments
| gbnews.com
| HN
ablation
14 hours ago
[-]
Please don't post GB News articles. It's worse than Daily Mail for sensationalist ragebait and gammon-pandering garbage.
reply
tom86150
18 hours ago
[-]
If have read a lot about censorship that this step is doing. Its simply protecting the youth from clever businesses making them dumber every day. They are not cut from communication, they still can call their friends. Teachers complain about the decreasing abilities of youngsters and true addictional behaviour.
reply
xeonmc
15 hours ago
[-]
Nothing new under the sun. Blanket Prohibition always breeds worse circumvention.
reply
lil-lugger
14 hours ago
[-]
Should we let teenagers buy alcohol since some get past the measures and buy anyway? Cigarettes? Drive a car?
reply
NVHacker
14 hours ago
[-]
No! But we should allow them use of the regulated social media.
reply
Sabinus
4 minutes ago
[-]
Social media is barely regulated and the New America will likely retaliate if non-American countries regulate it in way required for productive participation of 16 year old children.
reply
grim_io
12 hours ago
[-]
Alcohol is regulated, why not let them have it too?
reply
wongogue
11 hours ago
[-]
They have access to messaging and interest/group based social media. Just not public algorithmic feeds.
reply
defrost
19 hours ago
[-]
It's absurd to read anything about Australia through the lens of an antipodean GBNews Overnight News Editor who's never visited the country.

Other crackin' GBNews headlines by James Saunders include:

* 'Women-only' block of London flats now accepts men who 'identify as women'

* UK town plans balaclava ban after masked youth crimewave - but burkas EXEMPT

etc. ~ https://muckrack.com/james-saunders/articles

Great source of the latest disinformation by the likes of Nigel Farage, Michael Portillo, Jacob Rees-Mogg, et al, but:

  The channel is described as right-wing on political issues.
  As of 2025, polling suggested that GB News is the least trusted of the five main news broadcasters in Britain.
~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GB_News

As to the subject matter, few in Australia thought it would keep kids off of social media, at best most hoped it'd push the tide back a little and provide some leverage for parents to exert more pressure.

Kids flock to where other kids are, so far that's all the usual watering holes after side stepping bans .. it'll take a little longer for larger crowd shifts elsewhere.

reply
DecentShoes
18 hours ago
[-]
"Women-only' block of London flats now accepts men who 'identify as women'"

What's wrong with that one? It's dishonest if something claims to be women only but accepts men. And this is a growing problem, with women who object being sent death and rape threats over it regularly.

Are you saying you support a ban on women only spaces?

reply
defrost
17 hours ago
[-]
I'm stating that GBNews is a cesspit of click / rage - bait headlines from the extreme end of the UK Conservative wing.

I've an interest in the spectrum of UK political opinion and reporting, however GBNews is not a source of balanced reasoned quality journalism, nor is it a source that has good local reporting from Australian stringers.

In general, it's not a HN worthy source.

reply
moi2388
17 hours ago
[-]
Yes. I support a ban on women only spaces. Discrimination by gender is illegal.

Then why about dressing rooms etc? Simple, make individual cabins. Problem solved.

reply
wredcoll
18 hours ago
[-]
Give it a rest, nigel. Find some other place to peddle your malicious hatemongering.
reply
MentatOnMelange
19 hours ago
[-]
This is a strong argument in favor of hardware-based verification. Just force everything in the app store to verify whether a iphone is "child-locked" in some way. Also makes it much harder to bypass by users. And of course no risk of having your personal information exposed by data breaches that way.
reply
moi2388
17 hours ago
[-]
Or to finally ban illegal Chinese products, both hardware and software..
reply
platevoltage
16 hours ago
[-]
Why would you need to ban something that's illegal?
reply
moi2388
9 hours ago
[-]
Because making something illegal down mean you actually check for it, intercept them at customs, or prevent them from being able to be accessed
reply
platevoltage
5 hours ago
[-]
You miss my point. You said these products were already illegal.
reply