Volvo Centum is Dalton Maag's new typeface for Volvo
47 points
3 hours ago
| 14 comments
| wallpaper.com
| HN
systemtest
1 hour ago
[-]
> for the Swedish carmaker

Chinese. Volvo is a fully Chinese company that has some people working for them in Sweden. That does not make Volvo a Swedish carmaker. Zeekr also isn't a Swedish carmaker, despite having an R&D center in Gothenburg.

A friend recently got a steering pump for his classic Volvo 940 and instead of a European part the official Volvo dealership gave him a Chinese part. Broke in a couple of months.

The times that a Volvo would do 500,000 kilometers with basis maintenance is in the past.

reply
KomoD
1 hour ago
[-]
> Volvo is a fully Chinese company that has some people working for them in Sweden

Volvo (Cars) doesn't just "have some people working for them" in Sweden. Volvo Personvagnar Aktiebolag was founded in, and is incorporated in, Sweden. Their HQ is in Sweden.

Zeekr was started by a Chinese company in China and has their HQ in China.

I consider it "Swedish-Chinese"

reply
bryanlarsen
1 hour ago
[-]
Volvo has more people working for it in China than in Sweden.

Volvo builds more cars in China than it does in Sweden.

Volvo is owned by the Chinese.

Arguably more of the design for Volvo cars is done in China. It depends on whether you consider the visible design more important or the powertrain.

Volvo is part Swedish, but it's much more "Chinese-Swedish" than "Swedish-Chinese".

reply
potato3732842
6 minutes ago
[-]
Volvo is a textbook example of the arc of modern businesses that sell expensive and rarely purchased things to consumers. You put out good but expensive product for some time. It needs to be expensive enough so the poors can't get their grubby mitts on it and trash them and their image. And it needs to be nice so the non poors can enjoy it and have a decent experience. You make these products for awhile before selling out, making crap and watching people buy it because of the inertia of the brand. Then when the music stops you break up in bankruptcy, get acquired (by a Chinese firm in Volvo's case), bailed out, etc. Maybe then you go on to not suck, maybe you become a ball and chain around whoever is left holding the bag.

Volvo and Jaguar Land Rover are in later stages of this, Toyota as of late is in mid stages. Every major appliance brand has been through the full cycle it seems.

reply
Aloha
1 hour ago
[-]
Was Volvo an American car company when it was owned by Ford?
reply
matsemann
1 hour ago
[-]
So all American IT companies are really Irish or something, since they're incorporated there?
reply
systemtest
1 hour ago
[-]
IKEA is still Swedish despite being incorporated in The Netherlands and having all their "charities" in The Netherlands. For companies of that size, being incorporated somewhere is just an administrative trick to lower taxes. The same way I structured my mortgage to maximise tax returns.

Volvo Cars has been bought by Geely. That is not comparable.

reply
tekkk
1 hour ago
[-]
Are they owned by the Irish?
reply
colechristensen
1 hour ago
[-]
No the parent companies are always incorporated in the US, usually in Deleware.

They funnel all of their foreign profits through various tax shelter subsidiaries in Ireland and similar locations.

Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, and Netflix are all incorporated in Deleware, Apple is incorporated in California.

reply
amarant
1 hour ago
[-]
It's technically not wrong to describe Volvo as Swedish. It was founded in Sweden, the main office remains in Sweden, but it is fully owned by China.

Swedish or not is a matter of perspective at this point.

Similarly for mojang, king and dice. All founded in Sweden, main offices in Stockholm, and owned by American companies(ms, ms, and ea, respectively)

Arguably powerhouses of Swedish gaming, arguably American affiliates in Sweden.

reply
mikeryan
1 hour ago
[-]
Huh? Volvo is a subsidiary. Almost every legacy car company is a subsidiary of some kind. Lamborghinis aren’t German because they’re owned by Volkswagen group and often have Audi parts and Jeep isn’t Dutch because they’re owned by Stellantis.
reply
garyfirestorm
1 hour ago
[-]
Well I have recently noticed many news organizations don’t refer to the Detroit automakers as ‘the big3’ anymore. They make it a point to say ford and gm and quietly leave Stellantis out of the mix. Although Stellantis has strong presence in US as formerly Chrysler and Fiat Chrysler, the reality is they are not American auto company anymore. I’d guess they’re counted as European.
reply
emehex
59 minutes ago
[-]
I thought Volvo was publicly traded. Had to look it up.

Volvo Group - sells trucks - publicly traded - Swedish

Volvo Cars - sells cars - not publicly traded - 100% owned by Geely (Chinese)

Volvo Cars ≠ Volvo Group

reply
aplummer
1 hour ago
[-]
My anecdata on a 2019 Volvo xc40 is that it’s my most reliable car ever? Made in china too
reply
brewtide
31 minutes ago
[-]
2010 xc60 (turbo online 6) here a few thousand miles away from 300k...

It's got a few issues, but the thing has been a beast. Not sure how Chinese it is however.

reply
KomoD
2 hours ago
[-]
Something that would make driving safer is removing that massive tablet.

Give me buttons, not a font.

reply
skrebbel
1 hour ago
[-]
Concur. In fact I feel like it's painfully off-brand for Volvo to go all-in on touchscreens. They were so proud about inventing the 3-point safety belt that they embedded it into their logo for decades. Volvo has always been about safety and to-the-point functionality. If any brand could get an enthusiastic following (and a productive marketing campaign) for de-emphasizing screens and emphasizing buttons, it's them.
reply
colechristensen
1 hour ago
[-]
Volvo got sold.
reply
skrebbel
1 hour ago
[-]
Sure but the brand still has value.
reply
mikepurvis
2 hours ago
[-]
I'm the owner of a 2020 Volvo V60 that has been at Waterloo Volvo since March of this year, racking up an increasingly terrifying bill of various parts and wiring harnesses all ordered one after the other from Sweden.

Despite my frustrations with their shop, they have been very good about keeping me in a revolving door of 2025 and 2026 loaner cars, especially the XC40 and XC60. Despite the occasional glitched audio or freezing bugs, I think they really have done a good job with the Android Automotive integration. It's nice having it logged in and able to see my Google Maps search history, but without having to actually have my phone on me or plugged in for CarPlay. For example, if another family member borrows the car and all that stuff just works for them too without them having to separately configure their phone.

I would be nervous about how well it all will be supported over the long term, especially once these cars are >4yrs old and off lease. But at that point you can always fall back to projection.

reply
MisterTea
2 hours ago
[-]
That picture of the dashboard displaying "Hello, Liam" is what makes me super happy that I bought a 2022 Honda CR-V with a minimal computerized dashboard. I do not want my car knowing who I am.
reply
joezydeco
1 hour ago
[-]
Volvo tries to assign profiles (and Google logins) to each key so the idea is that the car is set up for you when you enter. They don't fully have it right (profiles only swap when the car is unlocked), so it's kind of pointless at the moment.
reply
systemtest
1 hour ago
[-]
Out of curiosity. It is possible to use a modern Volvo without a Google account?
reply
CodingJeebus
2 hours ago
[-]
Just because it doesn’t have a HUD on your dashboard doesn’t mean your vehicle isn’t tied to your personal identity in myriad ways. Almost all cars ship with sophisticated telematics systems nowadays.
reply
lawgimenez
1 hour ago
[-]
I wonder how the UI will adopt with a longer name.
reply
RankingMember
1 hour ago
[-]
I'm just sick of interfaces pretending to be human. Be an unabashed interface, just show me the gauges or weather or anything functional on boot-up. (Unless you're KITT- KITT can talk to me.)
reply
spankalee
26 minutes ago
[-]
The comments here sound like they're from people who don't work in tech or at large companies...

The Volvo software design team isn't responsible for fixing electronics bugs, and maybe not even responsible for the presence or lack of physical buttons. They didn't even make the font - it was contracted to a design studio. I seriously doubt this effort distracted too much from fixing the other things people care about. Big companies do multiple things at once.

reply
linksnapzz
35 minutes ago
[-]
Font is nowhere near as nice as Elston/Volvo Broad; but I suppose it's better for touchscreens. My advice for Volvo:

1.) Go back to actual buttons/dials (with the old font, please)

2.) Fix the comically bad horrifying electronics issues the new models have.

reply
tjomk
1 hour ago
[-]
They should instead focus on their overall software stability and usability. And introduce more physical buttons for climate control. I don't want to click 4 times on a screen while driving in order to enable seat heating.
reply
arjie
1 hour ago
[-]
That's actually quite a beautiful font. Hard for me to say why, but I feel the "Charging" text feels really balanced and pretty.
reply
DeepYogurt
2 hours ago
[-]
I wonder if its open license. Not as impactful as seat belts, but it would be nice to see volvo continue that legacy.
reply
embedding-shape
2 hours ago
[-]
> Not as impactful as seat belts, but it would be nice to see volvo continue that legacy

I'm afraid that legacy is long lost, Volvo is a very different company today than it used to be.

reply
SoftTalker
2 hours ago
[-]
Volvo no longer exists. It's a brand name owned by a conglomerate, the Zhejiang Geely Holding Group.
reply
embedding-shape
1 hour ago
[-]
I mean, it does exist, it goes by "Volvo Car AB", and it's a real company owned by Geely Holding (full name "Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co., Ltd.").

But it does exist, just isn't the same as it used to be, back in the "seat-belts is for everyone" era.

reply
viraptor
2 hours ago
[-]
Unless they're covered by a design patent, it's a free for all anyway in many places: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_protecti...
reply
annoyingnoob
2 hours ago
[-]
This is the state of Volvo innovation in 2025, a legible font. Geely has not been good for Volvo.

For a giant tablet with no buttons that never belonged on a dashboard. It is common knowledge that buttons are better for drivers. For a company supposedly focused on safety, they make their cars more dangerous for drivers by installing touchscreens and removing buttons.

reply
Ericson2314
53 minutes ago
[-]
As cars go to shit, I'm more and more glad I live in NYC and mainly use public transportation
reply
daft_pink
58 minutes ago
[-]
Personally, I’m waiting for the crash test results of this new typeface. Just sayin'
reply
homeonthemtn
2 hours ago
[-]
Isn't that just Calibri?
reply
mc32
2 hours ago
[-]
Why does a car company need to develop its own typeface?

Is it more cost-effective? Is it to have better control?

Is it for branding? (Although it does not appear unique/novel)

It’s not like it needs to solve something that isn’t addressed by other typefaces —at least I don’t see it. It’s not a radical departure from existing typefaces.

reply
6SixTy
41 minutes ago
[-]
Part of making a typeface is making it subconsciously part of the brand. Though there's precedent for making a functional font in this use case as Airbus designed B612 for readability within their glass cockpits.
reply
matsemann
1 hour ago
[-]
Half the value proposition of car culture is to symbol that you're better off than your neighbor etc. Of course branding is important, otherwise you would just buy the competitor's that also give you a couch with 4 wheels.
reply
exitb
1 hour ago
[-]
You get to decide which car you buy every X years. When the time comes, you pick one of the brands from the group you consider notable. Established brands do a lot of things to stay within that group. This one worked - we talk about it.
reply
chrisandchris
2 hours ago
[-]
As an owner of a Volco Electric, I am happy that they are focusing on fonts and adding nicknames to cars instead of fixing the countless bugs and issues these cars have regarding software. /s

Issues I encountered: - The schedule for AC charging moves by 1 hour when DST changes. So someone thought let's ignore daylight saving times for that. - The app randomly says "could not start heating/cooling", but still started it. - The last few times, AC schedule and power limit were ignored by the car (so charged 16 A but the car said only 14 A allowed) - Randomly, the AC schedule is in a random timezone (like 7-9h lff), but just for one day. - Sound sometimes does not work, like at all. Reboot the center display helps, but takes a couple of minutes.

Most days, it feels like they don't drive their own cars.

Regardless, I think the font is somewhat nice.

reply
joezydeco
1 hour ago
[-]
Agreed. The software situation seems to be getting more confusing by the month. AAOS builds have suddenly jumped from 3.x to 4.x and the release notes say "various fixes". Um, like what? Was there a major update to something or not?

I'm still on a AAOS 2.x release from 2023 and will not upgrade at this point.

reply