I find the proton as a gluon dandelion cloud enthralling
Truth is a strange thing in science. In normal language people would say “our latest interpretation”. Science would be more honest if it used language honestly.
In the article this refers to the finding that the quark is more complex than three valence quarks.
The measurements indicating that the three-quark-model is incomplete are overwhelmingly conclusive, so some degree of certainty in the language is warranted in my view.
I find that rather surprising.
Analysing hand-me-down neutron events from indirect collisions isn't quite as useful.
There’s an ultra cold neutron source at Paul Scherrer that is used to measure if the neutron has an electric dipole moment. This is complementary to high energy experiments.
Of course more experimental data is a good thing, but in this case it doesn’t seem obvious that it would lead to anything really new.