I optimised my vibe coding tech stack cost to $0
7 points
7 hours ago
| 4 comments
| HN
Since vibe coding came into existence, I have been experimenting with building products a lot. Some of my products were consumer facing and some.. well, internal clones of expensive software. However, since beginning, I knew one big thing - the vibe stack was expensive.

I initially tried a lot of tools - Bolt, v0, Replit, Lovable, etc. out of which Replit game me the best results (yes, I can be biased due to my selection of applications). But I often paid anywhere from $25-$200/mo. Other costs like API, models, etc. made monthly bills upward of $300/mo. Was it cost effective when compared to hiring a developer? Yes. Was it value for money? NO.

So, over the months, I optimised by complete stack to be either free (or minimal cost) for internal use or stay at a much lean cost for consumer-facing products.

Here's how the whole stack looks today -

- IDE - Google's AntiGravity (100% free + higher access if you use student ID) --> https://antigravity.google/

AI Documentation - SuperDocs (100% free & open source) --> https://superdocs.cloud/

Database - Supabase (Nano plan free, enough for basic needs) --> http://supabase.com/

Authentication - Stack Auth (Free upto 10K users) --> http://stack-auth.com/

LLM (AI Model) - OpenRouter or Gemini via AI Studio for testing and a custom tuned model by Unsloth AI for production. (You can fine-tune models using Unsloth literal in a Google Colab Notebook) --> http://openrouter.ai/ OR http://unsloth.ai/ OR http://aistudio.google.com/

Version Maintenance/Distribution - Github/Gitlab (both totally free and open source) --> http://github.com/ OR http://gitlab.com/

Faster Deployment - Vercel (Free Tier Enough for Hobbyists) --> https://vercel.com

Analytics - PostHog, Microsoft Clarity & Google Analytics (All 3 are free and independent for different tracking, I recommend using all of them) --> Https://posthog.com OR http://clarity.microsoft.com/ OR http://analytics.google.com/

That's the list devs! I know I might have missed something. If yes, just ask me up or list them up in the comments. If you have any questions related to something specific, ask me up as well.

udit_50
7 hours ago
[-]
Access here - - AI SDK - Antigravity- https://antigravity.google/ - AI Documentation - SuperDocs - https://superdocs.cloud/ - Database - Supabase - https://supabase.com - Auth - StackAuth - https://stack-auth.com - LLM/AI Model - Gemini by AI Studio (aistudio.google.com) or Self-trained Unsloth Model (https://unsloth.ai) or Openrouter for testing (openrouter.ai) - Deployment - Vercel (Vercel.com) or CloudFare Pages. - Analytics - PostHog (posthog.com) or Microsoft Clarity

Enjoy

reply
chvid
7 hours ago
[-]
If you are not paying for the product. You are the product.
reply
udit_50
6 hours ago
[-]
True somehow but this is the typical Silicon Valley style where most of the stuff is so democratised that for people to start off, it has become a big fallback.

Like if you are a student or planning to switch career, then take what's free.. build and learn and ship!!!

reply
rvz
7 hours ago
[-]
> Was it cost effective when compared to hiring a developer? Yes. Was it value for money? NO.

Is your product making any money?

If so can it scale past the free trial period (Over 10K users a month) and still sustain costs?

Free trials are not forever and limits can change without notice. Maintenance still costs time and money.

So it is not actually $0.

reply
udit_50
6 hours ago
[-]
I lowkey agree to this. But this is like a starter kit for people who are just mindlessly building and exhausting their credits on apps like Cursor or Replit.

Plus, having a dedicated stack that is you can functionally depend on, will help you scale much easily and accumulate very less technical debt overhead.

If you build an app mindlessly with Replit, chances there, you have a mock or hardcoded DB or auth and when you ship the v2, all data will vanish..

So, it's less of a good thing and more of a bad thing for people starting out.

But yes, you are truly right that this is also very inconsistent to rely on credits. I appreciate you raising this up!

reply
chiefalchemist
6 hours ago
[-]
Thanks for sharing.

Yes, costs can add up. But it’s also about investment / return. Saving $X if it’s less effective a/o costs you $Y, then it might not be the savings it appears to be.

It’s similar to DOGE. DOGE is about Efficiency. But it should have started with Effectiveness. Doing something (financially) efficient doesn’t mean it’s effective.

In short, list some alternatives a/o what you’re giving up by going free would be helpful. For example, Appwrite or Firebase as different (and free tier) backends. Each has their + and -.

Thank again. I will be checking these out.

reply
udit_50
6 hours ago
[-]
So much true. I have been a developer in past so I understand my bias towards convectional frameworks. For me, the biggest dealbreaker for Replit was the scale cost.

I the technical debt that I was incurring per project. It is still my go-to option for prototyping and quick tests but this was just the regular stack I am using to ship stuffs.

Also, yes, there a a lot of alternatives (great ones) that I missed and understand that the list is not complete.

Would love to know what stacks you use so I can also try them out.

reply