I got that impression too. Gatekeeping sensitive information is not necessarily bad, but the entire thing is sketchy. For example, is it legal or ethical for this group to have Washington Post data that was leaked or stolen? Are we really supposed to be against something called "Free Speech Union" because of the owners having controversial views? There is clearly a political angle to most of the stuff I've seen at a glance, and a lot of politics on one side only.

If only it were that simple. People seem to have to constantly argue about what human rights actually are. They use free speech to argue for all kinds of censorship for example. Censoring and harassing people who think differently will rarely do more than make them angry. Philosophers even centuries ago figured out that free speech is a most essential freedom and must be nearly unlimited in a free society, but it's a constant struggle to maintain this ideal in the face of the fearful and easily offended.

It's not about outing ideology, it's about publishing personal information. And I believe privacy is a fundamental human right (yeah, bold take in this day and age but I'll die on that hill).

> These people are actively working towards genociding groups of people

(Emphasis mine).

No they aren't. Or rather some of them may, but many aren't. Many of them are just brainwashed terminally online dudes who believe progressive values are why they can't be happy. These people don't actively work towards anything, they are literal losers. (I have a family relative who's like that, he says he wants to build a Christian family with many children to defend the white race, but he's desperately single and doesn't even show up in the events organized by his parents' parish to help young people found families. In fact, there are more girls than guys in these events, and they aren't the liberal type).

The people who are actively working on helping the fascist deserve all what we can throw at them (and not just figuratively), but this isn't the kind of people you'll find in The WhiteLeaks.

What’s the body count of white nationalists last year? Is there even 1? I think you’re falling for the hyperbolic language of political operators who want to scare you into voting for the scumbags that keep them employed.

The death of privacy is definitely a more fundamental issue here, outside of politics. In an ideal world, private citizens, even if they have notorious views, have a right to privacy.