Ask HN: What made you move back to HTML-to-PDF in production?
6 points
16 hours ago
| 1 comment
| HN
Curious what broke first — pagination, tables, fonts, or maintainability.

Context: I’m asking because I’m building an open-source tool around server-side HTML → PDF and keep seeing teams try “lighter” libraries first, then fall back to headless Chrome in production.

Curious where that tipping point was for you.

▲
baggy_trough
16 hours ago
[-]
I only know how to lay things out well in HTML, so I never moved away from it.
reply
▲
gokulsiva
14 hours ago
[-]
That makes sense. Have you run into any pain points once documents got large or more structured (tables, headers/footers, multi-page), or has HTML held up fine for you so far?
reply
▲
baggy_trough
13 hours ago
[-]
Yeah, the fact that Chrome doesn't support a lot of the CSS pagination properties is a problem. We have to use paged.js to do table of contents for example. And that requires controlling Chrome via puppeteer or the like. That's been a bit of a pain.
reply
▲
gokulsiva
11 hours ago
[-]
Yeah, that matches my experience too — Chrome gets you ~80% there, but the missing pagination primitives push you into extra layers like paged.js.

I’ve also hit issues with tables and page breaks.

Curious if TOC was the main blocker for you, or if there were other cases where Chrome alone didn’t hold up.

reply