U.S. carbon pollution rose in 2025, a reversal from prior years
48 points
4 hours ago
| 5 comments
| nbcnews.com
| HN
WheatMillington
2 hours ago
[-]
My country, New Zealand, is intent on self-flagellating with carbon policy which just feels so absurd and silly when our emissions are a tiny drop is the gigantic ocean of carbon emissions from the US and China. Why should we hurt ourselves economically when we cannot possibly make a difference, while our adversaries and allies alike enrich themselves while destroying the planet?
reply
bichiliad
2 hours ago
[-]
I hear you, and I think it's also fucked up (as someone who lives in the US) that our climate success is so easily reversed by the whims of whoever is in power today. If it makes you feel any less bad, new Zealand doing it acts as fantastic proof that a good chunk of New England could do it, or that the American South could do it. Plus, there isn't a lot of love for polluting policies; just tolerance from the government for polluters. Nobody here likes to see their kids have asthma, or to see their water contaminated. The size thing can make it feel hopeless, but what is the US if not a handful of New Zealand's?
reply
bamboozled
2 hours ago
[-]
Very sad, is the cost of energy way down at least?
reply
nielsbot
1 hour ago
[-]
I expect increased demand will lead to higher prices, which is one of the reasons that people are protesting data centers being installed near them
reply
LoFiSamurai
1 hour ago
[-]
Haha good one
reply
manoDev
2 hours ago
[-]
Congratulations.
reply
sexy_seedbox
2 hours ago
[-]
Thanks TrumpyBear!
reply
chmod775
2 hours ago
[-]
Don't let your political opinions get in the way of understanding what is happening around you.

> The increase in greenhouse gas emissions is attributable to a combination of a cool winter, the explosive growth of data centers and cryptocurrency mining and higher natural gas prices, according to the Rhodium Group, an independent research firm. Environmental policy rollbacks by President Donald Trump’s administration were not significant factors in the increase because they were only put in place this year, the study authors said.

reply
lowmagnet
10 minutes ago
[-]
Tom Cotton, (R) Arkansas is proposing a bill to shield households from increases in power costs in their region if datacenters are taking excessively in their grid sector. It *ALSO* allows for private power plants to bypass the EPA regulations public power grids are subject to.
reply
eli_gottlieb
8 minutes ago
[-]
Nonetheless, natural-gas and electricity prices are downstream of the past three or four or five Administrations' worth of public policy choices. I live in a place where electricity prices have shot up and it has taken us eight years to build transmission lines up to Quebec so we can import cleaner, cheaper energy from them. Eight years and tomorrow it's finally done: https://www.wwlp.com/news/massachusetts/massachusetts-poised...
reply
megaBiteToEat
16 minutes ago
[-]
Presidents can influence if data centers get built. Trump's inaction with regard to data center construction was a choice.

An intentional choice of inaction raised pollution.

Don't let spin doctors letting politicians off the hook rob you of critical thinking.

reply
tdeck
56 minutes ago
[-]
And which administration made it policy to deregulate cryptocurrencies?
reply
camillomiller
6 minutes ago
[-]
I would suggest you to consider how your holier than thou misunderstood bro-stoicism is doing exactly the same to your understanding of what’s actually going on.
reply
qtwhat
2 hours ago
[-]
maybe on the right path?

the cost of re-industrialization anyway?

reply