CSS Optical Illusions
185 points
16 hours ago
| 10 comments
| alvaromontoro.com
| HN
smusamashah
1 hour ago
[-]
This coca cola illusion is my favourite one https://gagadget.com/en/446542-a-photo-of-a-coca-cola-can-th...

Coca cola appears red when no red at all is used in whole image

reply
myfonj
14 hours ago
[-]
These "dots appearing only while (not) focused" are known as "extinction illusions", namely

    "25 - Appearing Dots"
is "McAnany's type" [1], and

    "26 - Disappearing Dots"
is known as "Ninio's type" [2], according Akiyoshi Kitaoka's materials. (I have recreated them too few years ago [3][4], before getting to the source.)

[1] https://www.psy.ritsumei.ac.jp/akitaoka/kieru3e.html#:~:text...

[2] https://www.psy.ritsumei.ac.jp/akitaoka/kieru3e.html#:~:text...

[3] https://codepen.io/myf/full/XjdmJy ( scintillation warning)

[4] https://codepen.io/myf/full/jMqoMW ( scintillation warning)

reply
brandon_bot
8 hours ago
[-]
Cool!

I did something similar for my personal favorite illusion, the Ames window illusion. Recreated with CSS: https://brandondong.github.io/blog/ames_window/

reply
sandpaper26
15 hours ago
[-]
This is cool, but more as a demonstration of interesting CSS techniques than optical illusions in my opinion.

Also, interestingly, I seem to be able to force myself to "see through" all of these illusions except for induced gradients, which I can't stop seeing unless I cover part of the screen.

reply
nilslindemann
15 hours ago
[-]
33 - color fan: There is another interesting optical illusion here: The fan seems to rotate faster when not directly looking at it.
reply
layer8
11 hours ago
[-]
Heh, I used to do these in Excel.
reply
aj7
4 hours ago
[-]
What would be most interesting is using optical illusions to help decode how brain visual processing is done.
reply
encom
15 hours ago
[-]
These are all super dark, for some reason.
reply
christophilus
15 hours ago
[-]
You have to actually run them. Otherwise, they're just a dark CodePen preview.
reply
encom
14 hours ago
[-]
Why the extra step of having to click each one? Only a few of them are interactive.
reply
d-us-vb
14 hours ago
[-]
Because codepens can run javascript. And if a page has 50 of them, it might make the page load time much longer. I know that all these examples are pure CSS, and maybe there is a setting in codepen to disable the "Run" button and automatically run it. Still, getting to decide is generally a better pattern than presuming that that's what the user wants, especially when the fact that the code is inside a codepen makes it explicitly not an integral function of the page. "I thought this was just a blog, and now you want me to run all this javascript??" -- some JS hater, probably.

I appreciate getting to choose as much as possible when code runs.

reply
zamadatix
13 hours ago
[-]
Somewhat ironically, Codepen ended up introducing the JS execution requirement to view the content.
reply
moralestapia
16 hours ago
[-]
Wow, this is great!

I want to put some of them in my UIs.

reply
herpdyderp
13 hours ago
[-]
I've often run into these unintentionally messing up my UIs!
reply
eulgro
10 hours ago
[-]
They could make capchas out of these.
reply