US judge rules Luigi Mangione won't face death penalty in CEO killing case
28 points
by Qem
1 hour ago
| 2 comments
| aljazeera.com
| HN
rahimnathwani
7 minutes ago
[-]
The article doesn't explain clearly why, even though no one seems to be disputing the murder, the murder charge is being dismissed.

It's because of jurisdiction.

Normally, only states have jurisdiction over murders. The feds can charge murder if and only if the murder is connected to some other federal "crime of violence" (e.g. killing a federal official, murder-for-hire across state lines).

Here, the federal 'hook' was interstate stalking. But the federal stalking crime apparently isn't a "crime of violence" because you can stalk without intentional force.

Because the stalking charges don't legally qualify as "crimes of violence", the federal government doesn't have jurisdiction over the alleged murder.

reply
qwe----3
1 hour ago
[-]
Why?
reply
laweijfmvo
1 hour ago
[-]
The article says why the death penalty is no longer on the table — because the federal murder and weapons charges were dismissed, and the remaining charges do not qualify for capital punishment.

The article does not say why the charges were dismissed, though.

reply
rolph
1 hour ago
[-]
no they dont say why, not here. apparently the cops acted like the 4th didnt exist, so the backpack contents were disqualified as evidence.

federal stalking charges have stuck so now life in prison is on the table.

reply
datsci_est_2015
7 minutes ago
[-]
This is a better source:

https://apnews.com/article/mangione-unitedhealthcare-death-p...

The judge ruled the backpack evidence can be used.

reply
toomuchtodo
44 minutes ago
[-]
He’s going to walk.
reply