▲monopoliessuck39 minutes ago
[-] I added Jellyfish and then Portuguese Man-o-war.
It took the man o war, but crossed out Jellyfish and said "added a vaguer term", but a jellyfish and a man-o-war are discrete animals.
The man-o-war is a colonial siphonophore composed of zooids, while a jellyfish is a singular marine organism.
They're both in the phylum Cnidaria, and that would have been a more vague term had I entered it.
reply▲One of the few sites with a fun "you have javascript turned off" message.
> This game requires JavaScript. Or, if you've superior taste, take out a pen and paper and start listing animals.
reply▲sublinear4 minutes ago
[-] I think that's meant to be a gentle insult, but I'm glad it had it's intended effect!
reply▲Lazy daisy:
(async () => {
for (c of 'red black white brown blue green yellow golden grey arctic mountain forest spotted striped'.split(' '))
for (a of 'bear lion tiger wolf fox eagle shark whale snake frog cat dog horse bat rat mouse owl hawk duck crab ant bee spider deer penguin elephant rabbit'.split(' ')) {
guessbox.value = c + ' ' + a;
uncomment(); attempt();
await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 75));
}
})();
reply▲No LLMs is impressive. Also recognizes "drop bear". Well played.
reply▲Hahah in a moment of desperation I put “unicorn” which its response made me laugh out loud.
reply▲themanmaran2 hours ago
[-] 68. The unique title texts are really fun. But I strongly disagree that "chipmunks are squirrels".
reply▲This is what I'm saying. Chipmunks are not squirrels. I will do my best on this hill.
reply▲Similarly, it insisted to me that a pigeon is the same thing as a mourning dove. Not true! But your case is even more egregious.
reply▲There are some weird ones. It knew red-bellied woodpecker but not yellow-bellied woodpecker.
reply▲samename14 minutes ago
[-] Fun results: outputted as emoji
30 animals listed
𓃱 𓃸
Edit: weird... emojis don't work here? how have I never known this...
reply▲It might be an interesting LLM benchmark: how many can they list without breaking the rules (repetition or non-animals). Although I bet that big bucks would be then thrown at pointlessly optimizing for that benchmark, so...
reply▲bronco210162 hours ago
[-] Might be an interesting problem for understanding how various models perform recollection of prior tokens within the context window. I'm sure they could list animals until their window is full but what I'm not sure of is how much of the window they could fill without repeating.
reply▲helloplanets2 hours ago
[-] I guess it could be generalized to filling up the context window with any token, but just making sure none of the tokens repeat.
An interesting twist could be making sure a specific token is an anagram of the token N tokens back. This could possibly measure how much a model can actually plan forwards.
reply▲helloplanets2 hours ago
[-] reply▲reply▲Hmm, what's this one?
var h = hash(guess);
if (h==7182294905658010 || h==6344346315172974) { return "Adorable guess, but it's spelled “rosy”."; }
I'm guessing they're hashes for "<something> rosie" or "<something> rosey", but what?
reply▲7182294905658010 "rosey maple moth"
6344346315172974 "rose maple moth"
reply▲helloplanets2 hours ago
[-] Yea, there's a bunch of easter eggs. And then there's the table for the taxonomy tree.
reply▲This was fun.
I definitely could feel the fatigue slowing me down until the timer got me. I also wasted a bunch of time trying to spell specific animals like the wobbegong.
I like the emoji output as well:
203 animals listed:
𓃬𓆊 𓃜𓃘𓅱𓆉𓅃
reply▲79. I feel like i should have done better but got stuck in a local minima of "farm animals, which obvious farm animals haven't I said??", then tried thinking of names of fish which worked until it didn't.
reply▲I got 42. I was very impressed by how it handled more and less specific categories. It also understood rotifers were a microscopic animal, which I half expected not to work. Great project.
reply▲110. my strategy is to use pokemon to remember animals. (i can list all 1025 pokemon from memory)
not a great strat, though. (tons repeated animals)
reply▲267, I was going pretty strong and had about 2 minutes racked up, until I hit a wall, and couldn't think of anything else. Thinking in groups helped the most, e.g. reptiles, flightless birds, african animals, etc.
Extinct animals also work, including the dinosaurs!
reply▲157. Very neat! Started a, b, c then found much more success when thinking about biomes (sea, mountains, forest, jungle, etc).
reply▲nice score! I got 129, and yes, same experience.
reply▲Instead of trying to think of just any animal, I found it easier to add a constraint…
1. Animal that starts with A
2. Animal that starts with B
3. Animal that starts with C
…
(I also appreciated the easter eggs: “Are you Australian?” and “You listed both dingos and dogs, so I gave you the benefit of the doubt, but there's disagreement on whether the dingo is its own species of canid, a subspecies of grey wolf, or simply a breed of dog.”)
reply▲2muchcoffeeman2 hours ago
[-] Without considering if it’s a distinct species, a dingo is descended from the same wolf population as dogs.
They are feral dogs. IE wolf -> domesticated dog -> became wild again.
reply▲I went by groups and families of animals.
reply▲teaearlgraycold6 minutes ago
[-] Countdown timer seemed stuck at 1:16 and then was suddenly big red and almost out of time?
66 animals listed
𓃬𓃰
reply▲129 here, not bad for the end of the day. I listed a surprising number of dinosaurs, and of course, edible animals, and Lion King stuff.
reply▲dudewhocodes2 hours ago
[-] Accepts the word "human" as well.
update: Start with "human" or "homo sapiens" and the website keeps changing as you add new words.
reply▲I said "ape" after and it wouldn't take it because I'd said human already :)
reply▲I like how it triggers an overlay when you try "human", it's a nice touch
reply▲there are so many special cases that this game responds to, i was shocked that it didn’t involve an llm at all at the end. very cool.
reply▲Possum => opossum is erroneous. I was planning to list both species, it wasnt a typo.
reply▲khazhoux44 minutes ago
[-] 130
Fun game, but also a fascinating brain-probe. We're not used to reversing our internal classifiers.
reply▲106, I feel like I should have done much better. (I feel like I cheated by naming a lot of dinosaurs and insects.)
The clown emoji is great. :)
reply▲Another 106 here. I got to the point where I was just blanking out looking at the countdown timer.
reply▲This is awesome. I made it to 100, but I know jack about animals.
reply▲140. Good fun. I like how it teaches you things, too. I learned that toads are considered frogs, axolotls are salamanders, and that it's "anemone" not "anenome". If you type in Unicorn it accepts it as "Unicorn spider" with a fun message. Don't forget to think of insects, birds and fish too, all of which it accepts. I love this kind of detailed, handcrafted thing that someone put a lot of time and effort into.
If you wanted to develop this more, some fun features might be telling you the most commonly entered animals you missed and the most unusual ones you thought of. Appreciate you probably want to keep it a static site though.
reply▲Jordan-11758 minutes ago
[-] 205! The running commentary was fun. And I love how permissive it is -- it was fun stumbling into a new category that you wouldn't necessarily expect to qualify. I do wish that there was an option to see a list of the most popular ones you missed (based on traffic to the article or similar).
For a similar brain exercise, try to Name Every City:
https://cityquiz.io/
reply▲49 as ESL speaker. Fun little game to practice English words :)
reply▲this was really delightful. The Easter eggs in particular made it feel like someone was actually on the other side
reply▲The background is alternating between cyan and black, which is very distracting. Not sure if that's on purpose.
reply▲disillusioned1 hour ago
[-] 205 and I very much was scraping the bottom of the barrel at the end. Starting a bit generic and adding specificity helped a lot. The little meta-commentary was great. "you already said dogs. dogs are dogs." when I tried "golden retrievers" after already typing dogs.
reply▲Buildstarted2 hours ago
[-] drop bear => Already said Koala. but if you type it before you say koala the answer drops from the top of the page. so many great easter eggs. got 92 in the end
reply▲I entered plankton, which technically isn't an animal and so it rejected it like any other random word, but then after I lost it offered me a link to the Wikipedia article on plankton. Very thoughtful.
reply▲Some animals replace vaguer definitions, but say "snake" is there forever, no cobra or viper for you. Strange.
reply▲It accepted tardigrade which I thought was interesting.
reply▲It pulls its data from Wikidata, which is very thorough, so I'd be more surprised if you managed to enter an animal it didn't know.
reply▲Lmfao black widow turns the title black I think
reply▲95. Definitely feel like I should have done better; will try another time with more sleep.
reply