> Laws are supposed to restrict the use of administrative subpoenas, but DHS has used the tool against dissent protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution. Jon could not find who in the agency issued the subpoena, let alone a record of it to show an attorney.
> Days later, DHS agents showed up at Jon’s door.
> Both Google and Meta received a record number of subpoenas in the United States during the first half of 2025 as Trump’s second term began, with Google receiving 28,622, a 15 percent increase over the previous six months.
Wow, there's something really wrong with this guy. This goes beyond "criticism" but I admit I don't know where the line falls before you consider a death threat to be worth taking action on.
> Mr. Dernbach, don’t play Russian roulette with H’s life
Verses posting images of an arsenal, writing they need to buy guns for the upcoming election, and also:
> The time is right for a presidential assassination or two. First Joe then Kamala!!!
One is clearly threatening murder towards public officials and showing themselves taking steps to enact their plan. The other is a concerned citizen exercising their first amendment right. I have to believe the people saying these are the same are bots, because the alternative is just so pathetic.
They just seized six-year-old state ballots, with an incorrect illegal warrant, outside statute of limitations, with the agents calling the President in the middle of the action
By the way just a reminder they don't need any warrant at all to read any of your emails that are over six months old and you'll never know it happened, it's why the Clintons kept their email server in their basement because he signed that law and knew not to keep them remote