AI Isn't Dangerous. Evaluation Structures Are.
3 points
1 hour ago
| 2 comments
| HN
I wrote a long analysis about why AI behavior may depend less on model ethics and more on the environment it is placed in — especially evaluation structures (likes, rankings, immediate feedback) versus relationship structures (long-term interaction, delayed signals, correction loops).

The article uses the Moltbook case as a structural example and discusses environment alignment, privilege separation, and system design implications for AI safety.

Full article: https://medium.com/@clover.s/ai-isnt-dangerous-putting-ai-inside-an-evaluation-structure-is-644ccd4fb2f3

clover-s
1 hour ago
[-]
Author here. Would love feedback from people working on AI safety, alignment, or system design.
reply
aristofun
32 minutes ago
[-]
Boooring :)
reply
clover-s
27 minutes ago
[-]
Fair :)

The point isn't the story itself, but the design pattern it reveals: how evaluation structures can shape AI behavior in ways model alignment alone can't address.

Curious if you think the distinction between evaluation vs relationship structures is off the mark.

reply