Gitas – A tool for Git account switching
34 points
4 days ago
| 10 comments
| github.com
| HN
Kwpolska
5 hours ago
[-]
Solving the problem of having a personal and a work GitHub account is really trivial without any extra tools. All you need is a dedicated SSH key for that GitHub account. (And why would you have a password for a ssh key on your personal machine?)

~/.ssh/config

    Host github.com-work
     HostName github.com
     User git
     IdentityFile ~/.ssh/work_id_rsa
     IdentitiesOnly yes
~/.git/config

    [user]
    email = work@example.com

    [remote "origin"]
    url = github.com-work:Work/Widget.git
reply
embedding-shape
5 hours ago
[-]
Which works for a while, until you have a bunch of projects under various identities.

In my main ~/.gitconfig I have:

  [includeIf "gitdir:/home/user/projects/embedding-shapes/"]
  path = /home/user/.gitconfig-embedding-shapes
Where basically `projects/` follow GitHub naming with $user/$repo, so I set the git identity based on all projects within that user, rather than repo-by-repo which would get cumbersome fast.

Then you just make sure you're in the right directory :)

reply
beaker52
2 hours ago
[-]
This. I’ve seen so many tools solving problems that already have solutions lately because LLMs allow people to run off and “fix” the problem their way before they can a chance to discover existing, more appropriate solutions.

The next step of this problem space is: “when I’m working on project X, I often forget to change my GitHub user with Gitas” so now they need direnv or something to switch it for them. The original solution foresaw this - so is far more complete that Gitas already _and_ built into git itself.

But, LLMs, so here we are, slowly drowning in a growing ocean of software built by the unaware.

reply
Terretta
20 minutes ago
[-]
> built by the unaware

awash in bliss

reply
accoil
3 hours ago
[-]
I use that approach. I also make sure to not set the [user] section in my main config (and only in the included files). That way if I'm operating outside of one of my user directories git commit fails due to having no user details.
reply
OrderlyTiamat
1 hour ago
[-]
> (And why would you have a password for a ssh key on your personal machine?)

You're presumably joking? If not, could you elaborate?

reply
PunchyHamster
1 hour ago
[-]
well if you have encrypted storage and already need password to get to it, secondary password is of little value

Tho I prefer to just use hardware key for ssh

reply
craftkiller
59 minutes ago
[-]
> well if you have encrypted storage and already need password to get to it, secondary password is of little value

That's only true when your machine is powered off. If an attacker manages to yank files from your disk while it is running, that ssh-key password is the difference between "they stole my ssh key" and "they stole worthless random data".

> use hardware key for ssh

That's the real solution. I don't understand why people still store ssh keys on disk when hardware keys are simple, easy, and significantly more secure.

reply
rzzzt
1 hour ago
[-]
ssh-agent will also be happy to provide the key to git after an initial unlock with the passphrase.
reply
arccy
3 hours ago
[-]
If you don't want to bother with directories or want to use https instead of ssh, you can do remote url based dispatch in your gitconfig:

    [credential "https://github.com/org1"]
      useHttpPath = true
      helper =
      helper = /path/to/auth.sh user1
    [includeIf "hasconfig:remote.*.url:https//github.com/org1/**"]
      path = user1.gitconfig
      ; set name / email in user1.gitconfig
where auth.sh is something that can produce the right token for the given user, e.g.

    #!/bin/bash
    echo "username=$1"
    echo "password=$(gh auth token --user $1)"
reply
xn
3 hours ago
[-]
Are there any good reasons to use multiple GitHub user accounts? GitHub organization membership and permissions are well designed in my experience, negating the need for multiple user accounts.
reply
StarlaAtNight
1 hour ago
[-]
Consultants or professional services folks will be working in their company’s GitHub account and several clients. Requires managing lots of git/GitHub accounts
reply
Terretta
15 minutes ago
[-]
Simplifying for brevity* -- there are three levels in the GitHub entity:

  - accounts (personal)
  - orgs (companies, directories, teams, roles etc.)
  - enterprises (sets of orgs)
Even with enterprise SSO, the initial connect to GH can (is typically) "you" (just as you have the same driver license to show at the front desk when registering to visit a secured firm or random hotel), then you elevate "you" into the org through SSO, and what policies apply to you via your org can be 'governed' at the enterprise.

The idea behind this model is that no, you don't have to manage lots of those as you, you're just you, and each of those you aim to use has an elevation that entity controls instead of you controlling it.

This ultimately results in way less key material floating around, and you losing, leaking, or lousing up your own GH cred doesn't auto-give an attacker the SSO elevation.

• • •

Not incidentally, I have a slew of "accounts" given to me by companies that don't bother to make an org, they just invite individuals to repos or make individual accounts for their repo. I suppose it's cheaper in the short run. In the long run, these accounts are 90% still left active years to (no kidding) decade+ later. Seems a better idea to "don't do this." If you're a company, be an org.

---

* Expanded for more depth: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/learning-about-github...

reply
embedding-shape
3 hours ago
[-]
> Are there any good reasons to use multiple GitHub user accounts?

Is there any good reasons not to separate what you work on into multiple GitHub accounts? Not to mention some people don't want all their projects attached to one profile, some people also develop in their free-time, and don't want to mix freetime/work projects under the same user account, for multiple reasons.

reply
jimmydoe
2 hours ago
[-]
A why not

B if you ever be in a company using the half baked GitHub hosted enterprise….

reply
Hamuko
1 hour ago
[-]
I use a pseudonym during my free time, so yes. Also my employer is requiring us to use company-specific GitHub accounts, so the decision is out of my hands anyway.
reply
jimmydoe
2 hours ago
[-]
For Claude Code users:

- using alternative host is not supported when roaming between local and cloud, fix is to add another origin you don’t use but use GitHub.com url

- CC uses gh command, which still needs account switch, this can be solved by add the switch to CC hook.

reply
adithyassekhar
2 hours ago
[-]
Is this that dropbox moment again? Anyway on Windows I keep a separate work and personal profile and GitHub auth doesn't go between them.
reply
sigmonsays
42 minutes ago
[-]
Feel free to have your own workflow but git already addresses this tools entire purpose with includeIf.

what does this address that includeIf does not?

reply
eqvinox
3 hours ago
[-]
You can put [user] blocks in repos, i.e.

  /some/where $ head .git/config
  [user]
   email = me@example.org
   name = My 'nick' Name
Doesn't tie into your SSH key though, if you need that.
reply
turbocon
3 hours ago
[-]
You can manage multiple ssh keys via your ssh config too. But this does seem to make things easier, I always end up fighting with this when I need to do it once every 3 years
reply
sevensor
3 hours ago
[-]
Github account switching. A git account is not an idea that makes sense.
reply
embedding-shape
3 hours ago
[-]
It's actually about git account switching as far as I can tell, which does make sense, you can have multiple "git" users indeed. Maybe it's the wording that is wrong? Read "account" as "user" and it might make more sense :)

  # in ~/.gitconfig
  [includeIf "gitdir:/home/user/projects/embedding-shapes/"]
    path = /home/user/.gitconfig-embedding-shapes

  # in ~/.gitconfig-embedding-shapes
  [user]
  name = embedding-shapes
  email = embedding-shapes@proton.me

  [core]
  sshCommand = ssh -i /home/user/.ssh/id_embedding-shapes
That's one of my git "accounts", currently I have four in total, one being my "real identity", other are pseudo-anonymous users.
reply
sevensor
2 hours ago
[-]
Fair point. This makes much more sense when you make it about your git identity + ssh configuration.
reply
christoph-heiss
1 hour ago
[-]
Yeah. Unfortunately, just goes to show how many people think Git = Github.
reply
teeray
37 minutes ago
[-]
When did using a single per-machine SSH key on a Yubikey become so dirty in the eyes of these enterprises?
reply
rgoulter
6 hours ago
[-]
For the use case of "use different accounts / configs for different directories", git's config has includeIf.
reply
dvratil
4 hours ago
[-]
I used to have a git post-checkout hook that set the repo identity based on the repo origin url [0] on checkout - maybe there's some post-clone hook these days, but 10 years ago when I wrote it there was only post-checkout hook.

[0] https://www.dvratil.cz/2015/12/git-trick-%23628-automaticall...

reply
PunchyHamster
1 hour ago
[-]
you can have per repo and per directory git config via git conditional includes

    [includeIf "hasconfig:remote.*.url:https://*.github.com/**"]
    path = /home/xani/src/gh/.gitconfig
reply
7777777phil
5 hours ago
[-]
Lovley, was looking for exactly that for some time. Will definitely try it, thanks for sharing!
reply
aditya24raj
2 hours ago
[-]
GitHub CLI has a command - gh auth switch. It makes it really easy to switch between GitHub accounts. I also wrote a small blog/guide about it- https://aditya24raj.github.io/blogd/using-multiple-github-ac...
reply