My first experience with an "AI"-ed call centre?
27 points
1 day ago
| 4 comments
| HN
I think I've just had my first experience with an "AI"-driven call centre.

I phoned up with a simple question about a UK Govt. service I use, and got a human being who repeatedly gave me wrong or non-answers in a wierd way I've never heard before. I reckon my voice was being put through voice-to-text feeding a chatbot which was replying in text on her screen and she was reading that text to me.

After a few "sorry, that doesn't answer my question at all" from me, she seemed to put her hands on the wheel to reply "You're not listening to me. I can't help you if you won't listen to me". I said "I'm listening but not hearing an answer." This must have been outside the chatbot's comprehension, because she then hung up the call.

I phoned back, got a different girl... who gave the same non-answers but with immaterial variations - ending with the same result. Total clincher.

This is the future, I guess. "AI"s operating human puppets.

xp84
7 hours ago
[-]
Interesting. Marshall Brain’s (RIP) Manna story had fast food restaurant management automated in this fashion, but I can see how customer service call centers fit the model quite well. We will probably see the “puppets” eliminated in 12-18 months when the voice models improve enough to be indistinguishable.

Government is actually a surprising place to see this, since in theory they’re supposed to care about serving the citizens, as opposed to for instance, American health insurers, who in general would rather deflect and deny, which AI is perfect for.

reply
raw_anon_1111
5 hours ago
[-]
I worked at AWS in the ProServe division during the height of Covid, every state was so swamped with calls about various government services we had to automate calls as much as possible and figure out other ways to “deflect” calls from call center agents. This was before AI when you had go use old school intents based systems like Alexa, Siri and Google did pre AI.
reply
chrisjj
6 hours ago
[-]
Manna, yes!

> We will probably see the “puppets” eliminated in 12-18 months when the voice models improve enough to be indistinguishable

> Government is actually a surprising place to see this, since in theory they’re supposed to care about serving the citizens

Well, it serves the citizens skilled only enough to work as puppets. The Govt. might say it also serves the users - cut cost per operator, increase number of operators, so reduce queue time. But then... Manna.

reply
allinonetools_
8 hours ago
[-]
I have noticed this too recently. The responses feel structured but miss the actual intent of the question. It is a good reminder that without real understanding and context, the experience quickly becomes frustrating instead of helpful.
reply
raw_anon_1111
5 hours ago
[-]
I mentioned in another reply that I built call centers during and after my time at AWS for organizations (Amazon Connect), I assure you that the human you get online is no more knowledgeable than the chatbot. Even before AI they were using a knowledge base. Now services like Amazon Q for Connect automatically displays KB answers to the agents based on the conversation you are having with the human agent.
reply
chrisjj
4 hours ago
[-]
Thanks.

Difference is, before, the human used domain knowledge to convert customer question into KB query. Now, that's done by "AI", so human needs no domain knowledge, nothing but the ability to perform the text-to-speech.

reply
raw_anon_1111
3 hours ago
[-]
My wife worked for Verizon soon after we got married as a CSR and I’ve witnessed first hand how they train CSRs at companies, the training is light and the turnover rate is high with the exception of people like 911 operators and they have workflows based on the type of call. Human CSRs are very much “automated”, scripted and get very little leeway to veer from the scripts.

Besides struggling with speech to text more than you are use to even with Siri because of the inherent limitation of the bandwidth that is used to delivery your voice over phone lines, there is no reason a well designed LLM based system couldn’t do as well.

But in my experience, there are a lot of people who specialize in call centers that don’t have a development background.

reply
chrisjj
6 hours ago
[-]
> the experience quickly becomes frustrating instead of helpful

... extending calls and thereby deteriorating queue wait time ... driving more puppet hires and raising costs!

reply
lyaocean
9 hours ago
[-]
The giveaway is usually failure recovery. Good human support can restate your question in their own words; scripted AI loops keep rephrasing the same wrong branch until you give up.
reply
chrisjj
6 hours ago
[-]
And her give up translated to hang up. Which ensures I don't get to answer the automated end of call "Rate me".

The operator performance metrics must have fallen through the floor. Probably the target has been lowered to cover it.

reply
raw_anon_1111
5 hours ago
[-]
So can an LLM based agent…

See my other replies. I know this space pretty well.

reply
andyjohnson0
13 hours ago
[-]
Please don't do this. Ask HN isn't your blogging platform. Per the guidelines its for asking questions of the community.
reply
chrisjj
13 hours ago
[-]
> Please don't do this. Ask HN isn't your blogging platform. Per the guidelines its for asking questions of the community.

Guidelines: On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting.

... which probably explains this post's +18 points.

reply