Rydberg atoms detect clear signals from a handheld radio
65 points
2 days ago
| 7 comments
| phys.org
| HN
jacquesm
5 hours ago
[-]
Oh, that's very neat, I can imagine that some future front-end to a SDR will have no antenna at all, just a bunch of solid state.

The abstract of the paper:

"""Coupling a Rydberg vapour medium to both microwave and optical fields enables the benefits of all-optical detection, such as minimal disturbance of the measured field and resilience to very strong signals, since no conventional antenna is required. However, peak sensitivity typically relies on adding a microwave local oscillator, which compromises the all-optical nature of the measurement. Here we introduce an alternative, optical-bias detection, that maintains fully optical operation while achieving high sensitivity. To address laser phase noise, which is critical in this approach, we perform a simultaneous measurement of the noise using a nonlinear process and correct it in real time via data processing. This yields a 35 dB improvement in signal-to-noise ratio compared with the basic method. We demonstrate a sensitivity of 176 nV / cm / sqrt(f Hz) , reliable operation up to 3.5 mV/cm at 13.9 GHz, and quadrature-amplitude modulated data transmission, underlining the ability to detect microwave field quadratures while preserving the unique advantages of all-optical detection."""

Emph. mine, at about -36 dBm that's not super sensitive yet though, but that formula suggests that at lower frequencies it should be a lot more sensitive.

The paper is at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-63951-9

reply
fsh
4 hours ago
[-]
The abstract is not very clearly written. The 3.5 mV/cm is the maximum detectable field strength before the system starts to saturate. I would be interested how the sensitivity compares to conventional (cryogenic) semiconductor detectors.
reply
jacquesm
4 hours ago
[-]
Ah, yes, you are right, I misinterpreted the part the maximum was aimed at, thank you for the correction.

And I too am interested in a like-for-like setup with the best of what is currently on offer as the benchmark.

reply
ElProlactin
5 hours ago
[-]
A company called Infleqtion already has an RF sensing product that uses Rydberg atoms.

https://infleqtion.com/quantum-rf-receiver/

reply
jacquesm
5 hours ago
[-]
Is it really a product already? There are a number of renders but the 'products' link does not work for me.
reply
numpad0
28 minutes ago
[-]
That page uses the older versions of "SWaP-C2 Optimized[1]" meme, I would guess it might have not been updated in 3-5 years.

1: Stands for "Size, Weight, and Power [and] Cost [and] Cooling Optimized", defense industry equivalent of self awarded gold medal stickers on product packaging, apparently

reply
ElProlactin
4 hours ago
[-]
Not sure if it's being "actively" used in real-world deployments yet, but it does exist.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/infleqtions-quantum...

reply
jacquesm
4 hours ago
[-]
Ok, I found a video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j18K7MZdyY8

That looks like it is definitely real but also extremely fragile and there is no mention of any performance specs. But that's 3 years old now and no product(s) available yet.

reply
rwmj
6 hours ago
[-]
That raised the question, how do you make Rydberg atoms, and the answer is (always!) with lasers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_atom
reply
rkagerer
6 hours ago
[-]
We demonstrated simultaneous reception of neighboring channels with strong isolation between them." This enabled the researchers to monitor numerous radio channels at once, instead of tuning into them individually.

Can anyone elaborate on this? How does a single receiver produce multiple concurrent outputs, and how are they isolated in this context?

reply
jacquesm
5 hours ago
[-]
Because all of the signals are superimposed. So if your receiver isn't selective it will show all of them at once and if you then demodulate selective parts of the spectrum by filtering you can isolate the signals individually.

Think of any antenna: it is just a rod or a coil, it may have a specific frequency that it particularly likes because that is a nice fraction of its wavelength or close to its own resonance frequency, but that doesn't mean it isn't going to receive all the other signals to greater or lesser extent as well. The ratio between that one that it likes and the rest is called selectivity. The lower the selectivity the more evenly you will receive all signals at the same time.

Usually receivers have a tuned front-end to get as much of the signal you want and to repress the rest as much as possible but that is optional, you can have a wideband front end just the same.

reply
amelius
6 hours ago
[-]
I have no clue, but I would guess that they do not have a single atom but rather an entire crystal of them.
reply
peter_retief
5 hours ago
[-]
I immediately thought of the old crystal radios and a short search brought up this comparison. While old radios used a natural mineral (galena) to detect radio waves, modern Rydberg radio receivers use a synthetic photonic crystal (often made of silicon or glass) to guide and enhance the radio signal for improved performance.
reply
jacquesm
5 hours ago
[-]
That's not the function of the crystal though, it is not optical but 100% electrical and serves to demodulate the signal, not to receive it.
reply
peter_retief
5 hours ago
[-]
reply
boznz
2 days ago
[-]
Interesting, I learnt something new today. My only comment was the noise floor of the simple graph was very high-25dBm which (without having a clue how the physics works and skimming the article) sounds about right for something with no proper RF front-end.
reply
Neywiny
2 days ago
[-]
Where do you see -25 dBm noise floor? But chance do you mean a 25 dB SNR?
reply
boznz
1 day ago
[-]
The picture here <https://scx1.b-cdn.net/csz/news/800a/2026/rydberg-atoms-dete...> though I just saw the X-axis refers to audio frequencies, kind of confusing on first glance.
reply
Neywiny
1 day ago
[-]
That's dB not dBm, and the article says it's normalized to whatever power each of the two options received at. Nothing about absolute power.
reply
amelius
6 hours ago
[-]
What modulation technique?
reply
hausen
5 hours ago
[-]
Considering the mention to Family Radio Service, most likely they're demodulating FM.
reply
m3047
31 minutes ago
[-]
"The key here is that the radio frequencies used in handheld radios are far from the natural resonances of the atom, so while the atoms can sense the radiation, they don't respond to the frequency modulation on which the audio is encoded,"
reply