10-202: Introduction to Modern AI (CMU)
93 points
5 hours ago
| 6 comments
| modernaicourse.org
| HN
aanet
2 hours ago
[-]
> AI Policy for the AI Course

“ Students are permitted to use AI assistants for all homework and programming assignments (especially as a reference for understanding any topics that seem confusing), but we strongly encourage you to complete your final submitted version of your assignment without AI. You cannot use any such assistants, or any external materials, during in-class evaluations (both the homework quizzes and the midterms and final).

The rationale behind this policy is a simple one: AI can be extremely helpful as a learning tool (and to be clear, as an actual implementation tool), but over-reliance on these systems can currently be a detriment to learning in many cases. You absolutely need to learn how to code and do other tasks using AI tools, but turning in AI-generated solutions for the relatively short assignments we give you can (at least in our current experience) ultimately lead to substantially less understanding of the material. The choice is yours on assignments, but we believe that you will ultimately perform much better on the in-class quizzes and exams if you do work through your final submitted homework solutions yourself.”

reply
linhns
1 hour ago
[-]
This is the way it should be. AI to speed up the understanding process, and one final evaluation without any help to cement the understanding.
reply
piker
46 minutes ago
[-]
My money is on extraordinarily poor final exam results and/or cheating.
reply
sim04ful
3 hours ago
[-]
Nothing on symbolic reasoning ?
reply
cultofmetatron
3 hours ago
[-]
I believe that would be part of whats now "classical ai"
reply
chvid
1 hour ago
[-]
No. That will be covered by the Post-modern AI course in the fall semester.
reply
xdavidliu
1 hour ago
[-]
that would be the exact opposite of modern
reply
mold_aid
51 minutes ago
[-]
Can't wait for postmodern AI.
reply
gabrieledarrigo
2 hours ago
[-]
Do you think this is a good course? Or, what do you suggest as a structured course to learn how LLMs work?
reply
emil-lp
4 hours ago
[-]
[flagged]
reply
small_model
4 hours ago
[-]
Well it's the dominant and most successful implemented AI, would a comp sci course teach every failed computer architecture or focus on the ones that are in wide use today.
reply
gield
9 minutes ago
[-]
Your analogy to computer architectures doesn't make sense, unless comparing GPT-like LLMs to different LLM architectures like Mamba or RWKV. It indeed wouldn't make sense to not teach about Mamba or RWKV in an introductory AI or LLM course.

AI is much broader than LLMs alone. Computer vision, RL, classical ML, recommender systems, speech recognition, ... are still part of AI, just not very visible to the average consumer.

reply
suddenlybananas
3 hours ago
[-]
I think comp sci courses focuse on fundamentals rather than what's popular. Besides, other kinds of AI are not "failures", they have plenty of uses.
reply
smokel
3 hours ago
[-]
Don't trip over words. The course offers quite a range of knowledge that is suitable outside LLMs. It's an introduction.
reply
axseem
4 hours ago
[-]
It really depends on the target audience, because a lot of people have no idea what they are using is called an LLM or that there are various types of generative AI.
reply
gignico
4 hours ago
[-]
I think the problem is the under representation of other branches of AI research: knowledge representation, automated reasoning, planning, etc.

These are important topics with important industrial applications which have the only downsides to not be suitable for implementing friendly chatbots and for raising the stocks of Silicon Valley companies.

reply
Kaethar
3 hours ago
[-]
I doubt renowned US universities don't offer courses that cover those topics.

As someone who studied in a university system where the courses you had to take were mostly set in stone (just starting to offer some electives now), I really fancy the option of being able to choose what you study as much as possible.

The AI course I took was mostly symbolic methods and some classic ML at the end. Most students were not interested at all and would've probably been more engaged studying ML directly. Too bad that wasn't an option.

reply
aboardRat4
2 hours ago
[-]
Nice to finally see the revival of Lisp and Prolog.
reply