World-first gigabit laser link between aircraft and geostationary satellite
49 points
3 days ago
| 5 comments
| esa.int
| HN
utopiah
57 minutes ago
[-]
reply
Meneth
1 hour ago
[-]
"low-latency links", says the article. I wonder if they consider 500 ms ping to be low, or if they want to replace Geostationary with Low Earth Orbit.
reply
fidotron
58 minutes ago
[-]
Getting it to work with one end stationary first sounds like a reasonable development plan. LEO adds a lot of complexity, but with huge benefits.

OTOH the number of engineers that focus on throughput over latency is quite staggering.

reply
IrishTechie
52 minutes ago
[-]
I guess if your goal is just to stream aircraft telemetry and black box like recordings then latency may not be high on the agenda.
reply
SiempreViernes
15 minutes ago
[-]
I think it's the opposite? For small telemetry you want it now, but for the big data products there's no hope of "now" and so you settle for soon.
reply
cm2187
1 hour ago
[-]
But that means you need to have a different laser pointed at every single individual aircraft right? Doesn’t really scale.
reply
amelius
1 hour ago
[-]
I suppose you can do time-sharing. And use mems-mirrors to quickly move the beam between different targets.
reply
esseph
2 minutes ago
[-]
[delayed]
reply
voidUpdate
41 minutes ago
[-]
If starlink satellites get laser downlink, it might work :P
reply
myrmidon
2 hours ago
[-]
I'm really curious how the tracking works in such a system, and how "bad" the beam spread is (my impression is that from the diffraction limit alone the beam has to be spread over at least a ~10m radius after travelling 36000km).

Some info on the laser itself would also be very interesting (power? wavelength?).

Really cool project though!

reply
amelius
1 hour ago
[-]
> and how "bad" the beam spread is

The spread makes the tracking easier, I suppose.

reply
TimorousBestie
11 minutes ago
[-]
Perhaps a little, however. Different paths through the atmosphere will perturb the phase of the signal; depending on conditions not all of that ~10m beam width is going to decode with an acceptable bit error rate.
reply
xnx
3 hours ago
[-]
Impressive! I believe round trip latency would be 0.5 seconds.
reply
1e1a
2 hours ago
[-]
That's ~162.5 MB in transit at any time
reply
kevincox
1 hour ago
[-]
Excellent for pingfs (https://github.com/yarrick/pingfs)
reply
htgb
2 hours ago
[-]
Shouldn't it be 1000/16 = 62.5? Impressive nonetheless, of course!
reply
1e1a
48 minutes ago
[-]
The article says 2.6 gigabits/second which is 2,600,000,000 bits/second, 2,600,000,000b/s * 0.5s / 8 is 162,500,000 bytes, 162,500,000 / 1,000,000 is 162.5 megabytes
reply
zppln
2 hours ago
[-]
Weird.
reply