How the Government Deceived Congress in the Debate over Surveillance Powers (2013)
85 points
6 hours ago
| 3 comments
| eff.org
| HN
mwcremer
1 hour ago
[-]
“I work hard to avoid ~~even~~ only the appearance of impropriety.” —-Not Rep. Richard Hanna
reply
srean
4 hours ago
[-]
Has anyone in the recent past been punished for lying to the Congress ?
reply
wahern
21 minutes ago
[-]
I'm not sure about the most recent successful charge, but this is one of the charges used against James Comey: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecution_of_James_Comey

Here's a 2018 article listing some prosecutions: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/5-people-who-lied-...

Because it's the DoJ prosecuting, I'm guessing (but don't know first-hand) that it's uncommon for the government to prosecute administration witnesses, even from previous administrations. Once upon a time Congress would prosecute and impose punishment itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress#Inherent_...

reply
jkestner
2 hours ago
[-]
Mostly, they want to be lied to. If we start holding power accountable, it might come around to them!
reply
ramon156
4 hours ago
[-]
Who's supposed to punish congress, it damn aint the people
reply
actionfromafar
4 hours ago
[-]
Nowadays, not so much "deceiving" going on but rather "believe me or your lying eyes" vibes coming from the government.
reply
doener
4 hours ago
[-]
I actually miss the days when the US administration in charge at least tried to appear not to be corrupt and malicious.
reply
freeopinion
9 minutes ago
[-]
Let's say--hypothetically--that the U.S. President walked out into Times Square in broad daylight and shot a person to death unprovoked. Who would prosecute that crime?

If you can't (or won't) be prosecuted, why hide your crime?

reply
unsnap_biceps
3 minutes ago
[-]
New York State, due to the fact that murder is generally a state level charge and not a federal one. However, your broader point still stands.
reply