Evolving descriptive text of mental content from human brain activity
22 points
by ggm
4 hours ago
| 5 comments
| bbc.com
| HN
jml7c5
28 minutes ago
[-]
As I understand it, the big challenge with brain electrodes is that because they are implanted in a big jiggly piece of jelly, they shift out of position and/or cause localized scarring. The practical effect is that the brain-electrode interface "wears out" after a while, and you can't get useful data. Has this been solved, or are implants still temporary?
reply
dr_dshiv
2 hours ago
[-]
I have a PhD student working on EEG audio decoding. We are presently focused on a simpler subtopic: the detection of consonance and dissonance in the brain as it listens to music.
reply
kennyloginz
2 hours ago
[-]
Sounds awesome!
reply
ksaj
2 hours ago
[-]
They don't seem to mention if it is elective. An all or nothing mechanism might spell out words that the patient really didn't intend on others seeing (like "Ugh, that guy again! I can't stand the way he...")

It is pretty difficult to control your inner dialog against spontaneous and triggered thoughts.

reply
Tade0
47 minutes ago
[-]
I wanted to comment this HN entry with "people with intrusive thoughts sweating profusely" or something similar, but in truth are there people with no intrusive thoughts whatsoever?

I for one don't fight them, regardless how horrible they would be spoken out aloud, because so far I haven't seen any evidence of anyone reading my mind.

I also made a point of explaining to my child that her thoughts are hers and hers alone, so she can think whatever she likes.

I would rather not have to backtrack on any of this.

reply
throwaway290
33 minutes ago
[-]
> are there people with no intrusive thoughts whatsoever?

There are people with no internal monologue whatsoever.

reply
trocado
46 minutes ago
[-]
"Mental content" seems way to broad for what is rather the sensorimotor part of speech.
reply
vlovich123
3 hours ago
[-]
Prediction: even if this requires surgery, unlocking inner thought will be used in criminal proceedings to establish guilt or attempt to be used to prove innocence. It will definitely be used unethically in military/intelligence interrogations until the law catches up.
reply
ksaj
2 hours ago
[-]
I'm not sure if this would be able to detect the difference between truthful thoughts about actual memories, and intrusive thoughts that could give the entirely wrong impression.

Yet, they still do use lie detectors, even though the things they detect can be faked, or triggered out of personal alarm or offense. So it is entirely possible, regardless.

reply
polytely
14 minutes ago
[-]
torture not being that effective has never stopped the US government before
reply
red75prime
2 hours ago
[-]
"Hit him with this $5 wrench until he tells us the password" XKCD 538
reply
devmor
2 hours ago
[-]
We normally do not accept people being hit with wrenches (or a contextual contemporary) in criminal justice trials.
reply
red75prime
1 hour ago
[-]
I don't think that the brain surgery is accepted as well.
reply
pmontra
1 hour ago
[-]
My first dystopic thought was immigration counters at airports /s
reply