Motorola announces a partnership with GrapheneOS Foundation
322 points
by km
2 hours ago
| 28 comments
| motorolanews.com
| HN
silisili
1 hour ago
[-]
This was figured out a while ago based on the hints given.

That said, I'm pretty excited. Motorola of the last decade or so has made really good hardware with basically stock firmware and a terrible update policy, which is why many avoid them. Seriously, they just offer quarterly updates on flagships, which is incredibly unsecure. Punting software to Graphene solves the biggest gripe many have.

reply
agile-gift0262
29 minutes ago
[-]
That is also ths reason why I migrated my parents from Motorola to Pixel. Well… that and the amount of bloatware and ad notifications a new Motorola I bought had. I returned it inmediatelly, and it's then when I went for Pixels.
reply
SockThief
14 minutes ago
[-]
That is not what I experience on ThinkPhone. I get monthly security updates for about two years now.

Maybe it is an exception? I'm in EU if that matters.

And Motorola is almost free of bloatware. It is practically a stock Android.

reply
joecool1029
3 minutes ago
[-]
> Maybe it is an exception?

The ThinkPhone is an exception, yeah. It’s similar to older Android One phones like their Moto X4. Not different because you are in EU, US models get same treatment.

The razr and edge lines do not get as reliable monthly updates and ship with bloatware.

reply
julcol
8 minutes ago
[-]
not any longer. My edge 70 required weeks to uninstall bloatware, taboola and all that crap. Eventually settled with netguard to kill any non approved outgoing connection. It has been a real pain. Changed my view on moto completely. I have been a happy user of a Motorola one for 6 years...
reply
joe_mamba
5 minutes ago
[-]
According to Reddit, that Thinkphone seems to be an exception to Motorola's poor update reputation.
reply
Imustaskforhelp
1 hour ago
[-]
Update policy is one of the largest reason if not THE reason why I didn't pick motorola phone. We had a last Motorola phone which we had to buy a new one solely because the last phone hadn't received updates even though the hardware was top notch and we needed an particular app (also its battery was a bit of issue)

So with them partnering up with graphene, I am super excited too. Motorola phones are also pretty price effective imo for the quality of hardware.

reply
mnmalst
50 minutes ago
[-]
I am exited as well but the OS is only one part of the equation. If the firmware BLOBs don't get updates we still have a problem. I really hope this cooperation means that Motorola commits to longer support for gOS devices.
reply
b112
33 minutes ago
[-]
And the radio firmware.

From a phone by a Chinese company.

Unless GrapheneOS handles the radio firmware, not really interested.

reply
anon5739483
1 hour ago
[-]
GrapheneOS is finally decoupling itself from Google Pixel phones. This is great news. Motorola makes great hardware too. Looking forward to see what comes out of this.
reply
roysting
1 hour ago
[-]
> Motorola makes great hardware too

Do they? I genuinely don’t know because I don’t think I have ever seen a Motorola smartphone in the wild and their heavy involvement with the police and surveillance state has my attention piqued a bit. I’m just saying GrapheneOS partnering with possibly the biggest police state surveillance solutions provider? What’s that all about?

reply
DerekL
32 minutes ago
[-]
Are you confusing Motorola Mobility with Motorola Solutions? The article is about Motorola Mobility, which makes cell phones. Motorola Solutions makes two-way radios and surveillance systems. They split in 2011.
reply
linker3000
27 minutes ago
[-]
The Motorola phones are generally good performers and value for money. My only gripe is that they cannot have their batteries replaced easily - even by phone repair shops.

I understand that this is because you have to disassemble / un-glue the phones through the front and remove the display. For this reason, the repair shops I have asked have said they don't 'do' Motorola phones because there's too much risk in breaking the display.

This effectively means that the life of the phone is determined by the ageing of the battery.

reply
SyneRyder
22 minutes ago
[-]
I bought a Motorola phone (G Stylus 2025) while in the US after discovering my brand new Sony Xperia VII phone would not work in upstate NY.

It's a great device, I loved using it. It had features I specifically wanted (still has a 3.5mm jack, a microSD slot, and wireless charging). It also looks fantastic with their Pantone colours, and it feels more comfortable than my Xperia VII. There's a wired fast charge feature that is incredibly fast. The Motorola was just 25% of the price and it's as good as the Sony in almost every way.

I do remember one flaw, the compass (ie direction pointing in Google Maps) was terrible. I'd sometimes walk a block using Google Maps before finding the compass was leading me in the wrong direction. But GPS seemed fine, and data reception was sometimes better than my friend's iPhone in the same places. The selfie camera was excellent, though something about the rear camera I wasn't quite as happy about. The Stylus is nice to have, but honestly I don't use it as much as I thought I would.

I wish there were more Motorola phones in Australia, I've probably become a Motorola / Lenovo customer now. (I already use a Lenovo ThinkPad).

For reference, my previous phones have been iPhone, Google, Samsung, Sony, now Motorola.

reply
iamflimflam1
12 minutes ago
[-]
Direction pointing seems to be pretty bad in any built up area (on my iPhone and my wife’s Pixel). I suspect that they are relying on accurate GPS for it combined with the magnetic compass. Both of which are a bit hit and miss when you are surrounded by tall steel framed buildings.
reply
user_7832
59 minutes ago
[-]
> I don’t think I have ever seen a Motorola smartphone in the wild

Probably depends a lot on where you live tbh. Here in India it's moderately common. I think Europe and Latin America also have a fair amount of sales.

reply
john_owl
31 minutes ago
[-]
In Brazil it's very common, I had a few Motorola phones when I lived there. They have a great benefit-cost ratio.
reply
pferde
29 minutes ago
[-]
I've had a Motorola smartphone for four years before moving on to a Pixel with GrapheneOS and was mostly satisfied with it, so this announcement sounds rather good to me. Can't wait for the product(s)!
reply
wolvoleo
18 minutes ago
[-]
Hmm the one thing I'm kinda missing with grapheneos is mobile payments. The banks here in Europe used to have their own nfc apps but in my country they've all moved to Google wallet :( or Samsung pay.

I don't want Google monitoring my payments so I'm using Samsung now but I'd love to have something more open for this.

I was kinda hoping the partner would be Samsung so they might collaborate on a payment system too. I don't think Motorola has anything like that.

reply
aucisson_masque
26 minutes ago
[-]
Hopefully wireless payment do work on these, and they have face unlock working. That's really the 2 issues I have with grapheneos.

I know it's supposed to be for privacy nerd, and they will tell you you shouldn't use Google pay because it's bad for privacy and so on... But it's not the majority of people, most are willing to trade some privacy for convenience.

reply
nie100sowny
16 minutes ago
[-]
Here it's Google not wanting to certify GrapheneOS I think, despite their valuable contributions to the AOSP.
reply
SSLy
3 minutes ago
[-]
Wireless payments skipping Google Wallet work just fine on GOS.
reply
preisschild
6 minutes ago
[-]
Google Pay only works on device/OS combos that have the specific blessing from Google. Only google can make it work.
reply
ddtaylor
1 hour ago
[-]
Motorola if you're reading this remove Glance from your Android 16 on lower end phones it breaks the phone. I'm sure you have some deal with them, but you have control over technical failures that render the device unable.
reply
duckerude
1 hour ago
[-]
Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45585869

(At the time it wasn't public which OEM GrapheneOS would partner with.)

reply
madduci
50 minutes ago
[-]
I really hope that the partnership involves support for low-end devices and not only high-end ones. Would be great to have a €200 Phone running GrapheneOS (e.g. G56)
reply
nie100sowny
14 minutes ago
[-]
I guess it's rathet hard to satisfy GrapheneOS requirements in 200 bucks budget. Things like at least 5 years of updates.
reply
pferde
24 minutes ago
[-]
The misspelling of "GrapehenOS" in the tags below the article does not bode well for Motorola... :)
reply
10729287
1 hour ago
[-]
Back in the days, I switched from Iphone 3G to Motorola Defy in order to benefit from more customisation. I'm now back into Apple ecosystem since iPhone 6, actually on iPhone 13 but i'm very tempted by GrapheneOS. Going back to Motorola would please me, as I loved this little Defy. Do you think there's any chance to have RCS messages without Google involved ? I want group messages without having to install Whatsapp and not all my contacts are on signal.
reply
fc417fc802
56 minutes ago
[-]
> I want group messages without having to install ...

Well now I'm confused. I've always received SMS as fallback when my contacts add me to RCS group messages. But apparently this doesn't always work according to people on the internet at large?

Unfortunately most people still think they're "texting" and have no idea Google and Apple pulled a bait and switch. Meanwhile on my end I receive emoji react spam, each emoji as an independent message, in an incredibly verbose form that quotes the entire message.

It's simultaneously misleading people, a DoS against non-BigTech clients, and monopolistic. The mobile ecosystem just keeps getting worse and there's no sign of regulations fixing it any time soon.

reply
Groxx
6 minutes ago
[-]
It's supposed to work by downgrading everyone involved if any are not on RCS. Which has been working fine for me at least, normal MMS issues aside. RCS keeps an "is X using RCS?" list on their servers, and every attempt to message someone checks that (with a local cache). And like >99% of those servers are Google, at this point, so it should be pretty consistent.

That said, I have no idea how often that fails in practice.

And that is how reactions are sent in SMS/MMS. Your app just isn't recognizing them to display them nicely. Maybe try a different one?

reply
Satuminus
1 hour ago
[-]
This is good. Having an alternative to Pixel-Phones for GOS makes sense. I wonder if we will have the option to buy a Motorola phone with GOS out of the box (not sure if i would trust that, but it might be interesting for some people that are skeptical of installing it on their Pixel by themselves).
reply
hashworks
1 hour ago
[-]
AFAIK you can verify the integrity of an existing GrapheneOS installation.
reply
pferde
19 minutes ago
[-]
reply
zx8080
1 hour ago
[-]
reply
gertrunde
1 hour ago
[-]
Was, they sold it on to Lenovo in 2014.

[ https://news.lenovo.com/pressroom/press-releases/lenovo-comp... ]

reply
tim-kt
1 hour ago
[-]
Motorola was subsequently sold to Lenovo in 2014.

https://news.lenovo.com/pressroom/press-releases/lenovo-comp...

reply
klausa
1 hour ago
[-]
Literally the first three words of the announcement that this submission is about are "Motorola, a Lenovo Company".
reply
aniviacat
52 minutes ago
[-]
Is that still up to date? On Motorola Mobility's Wikipedia page [1] it says

> [Motorola Mobility LLC] is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Hong Kong based Chinese technology giant Lenovo.

Lenovo is a publicly traded company, and according to its shareholding structure report for 2025 [2] its main shareholder is Legend Holdings Corporation. (Lenovo is also listed as a subsidiary on Legend Holding Corporation's Wikipedia page [3].)

Legend Holding Corporation is again publicly traded, with all big shareholders being Chinese according to its 2024 annual report [4]. The biggest one is CAS Holdings with 30% of the shares.

The China Academy of Sciences is owned by the Chinese government.

So it seems like if Google still owns part of Motorola Mobility, it's not a main shareholder.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_Mobility

[2] https://investor.lenovo.com/en/ir/shareholding.php

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legend_Holdings

[4] https://www.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2025/0429/2...

reply
jakkos
1 hour ago
[-]
Google sold the company to Lenovo in 2014
reply
mhio
1 hour ago
[-]
Cunningham's Law in full effect!
reply
ItsHarper
1 hour ago
[-]
No it's not. Google sold Motorola to Lenovo like a decade ago.
reply
neumann
1 hour ago
[-]
They sold Motorola to Lenovo in 2014
reply
Youden
1 hour ago
[-]
Only for two years: https://news.lenovo.com/pressroom/press-releases/lenovo-comp...

Didn't you read the article? It's kinda hard to miss the Lenovo all through the press release.

reply
Imustaskforhelp
1 hour ago
[-]
Motorola is a lenovo company.

Atleast in the former moto Phone I had, even its boot sequence included the logo of motorola and then saying, a lenovo company.

It was a google company before 2014 but it was sold in 2014.

reply
gib444
1 hour ago
[-]
No, Lenovo owns Motorola

Google owned it 2012-2014

reply
phoronixrly
1 hour ago
[-]
I was going to ask wasn't motorola bought and sold so many times that it ended up in Chinese hands. It ended up in Google's hands instead... Ngl, kind of underwhelming from Graphene

Edit: wait, that's old news, it is part of Lenovo...

reply
3nrico
1 hour ago
[-]
That article is fron 2012. According to wikipedia Motorola Mobility was then aquired by Lenovo in 2014, and Lenovo still ownes Motorla Mobility to this day.
reply
Imustaskforhelp
56 minutes ago
[-]
Thinkpads are also part of Lenovo and is technically Chinese. But see, which device is recommended for privacy purposes the most because of Libreboot/Coreboot and how much respected thinkpads are in the privacy minded community.

Can't believe I am saying this but a chinese company can be good and an american company can be bad.

Not an exact fan of china, especially their authoritarianism but I am not a fan of america right now either.

For what its worth, a lot of American phone companies also use chinese factories or chinese components and assemble them in India or Vietnam (Apple) and then say that we are making phones in India which while true, isn't the most accurate picture but it keeps the masses happy.

reply
okanat
1 hour ago
[-]
It ended up in Chinese hands.
reply
ggm
1 hour ago
[-]
Will the sandboxed google play permit banking apps to work using TPM and secured credentials?

Is it even possible to store secure credentials properly?

I would expect whatever you initialised before grapheneOS is wiped before you can run the alternate OS.

Is termux possible with a root/sudo function?

reply
ulrikrasmussen
1 hour ago
[-]
My banking app works fine on GrapheneOS today, but not every banking app does. If it depends on Google Play Integrity with strong integrity it won't because Google has successfully sold the blatant anti-competitive lie that you need to vendor lock-in your users to their OS to get security on mobile.

Secured credentials work fine, everything works fine except stuff that by design is locked in to Google like Google Pay.

reply
hashworks
1 hour ago
[-]
> Will the sandboxed google play permit banking apps to work using TPM and secured credentials?

Apps that don't work don't fail due to technical reasons but because upstream says so, i.e. Google Wallet. My banking app works just fine.

> I would expect whatever you initialised before grapheneOS is wiped before you can run the alternate OS.

Yes.

> Is termux possible with a root/sudo function?

GOS doesn't support root by itself since they deem it a security risk, but it's possible.

reply
kelnos
52 minutes ago
[-]
I think most banking apps already do work on GrapheneOS (not sure about TPM/secured credentials though). Graphene IIRC keeps a compatibility list somewhere. Some don't work, of course, but more do than I would have expected.

For me, the big question is if Google Wallet & its NFC payments will work. They don't on GrapheneOS currently, but if Motorola plans for this to be a fully Google-certified phone with GApps and everything, it will have to, somehow.

reply
shakna
27 minutes ago
[-]
reply
anon5739483
1 hour ago
[-]
I don't think GrapheneOS team would partner with a vendor unless their security/usability standards were met (considering how long it took since the initial announcement) so I'm expecting feature parity with Pixel variants.
reply
kelnos
50 minutes ago
[-]
I'm just really curious if this phone is going to pass Google's conformance tests and whatnot. I feel like some of that is incompatible with GrapheneOS's security model, so I wonder what's going to happen there.
reply
jackhalford
1 hour ago
[-]
Excited for this, GrapheneOS teased this a few months back. I might finally move away from iOS.
reply
hyfgfh
1 hour ago
[-]
How about replaceable batteries?
reply
patall
37 minutes ago
[-]
EU regulation on that should come into force in Feb 2027.
reply
pu_pe
40 minutes ago
[-]
I'd bet there is a huge market for a cheaper phone with GrapheneOS support. Lots of people in Europe and India right now looking to decouple.
reply
echelon_musk
7 minutes ago
[-]
No handsets until at least 2027.
reply
tonydav
41 minutes ago
[-]
I hope Lenovo can add the auto call recording toggle in GrapheneOS.
reply
brynet
34 minutes ago
[-]
Congrats to Daniel and the team.
reply
jauntywundrkind
1 hour ago
[-]
Alas that in the US it is seemingly impossible to get unlocked bootloaders now. I'm trying to figure out what couple-year-old international phone to buy now.

Good on Motorola. Incredibly smart to tap these passionate geniuses.

reply
fc417fc802
1 hour ago
[-]
No idea about buying new phones but refurbished pixels with unlocked bootloaders seem to consistently be available from reputable sellers in the US.

It can be difficult to tell if the bootloader is unlocked from the listing though. There ought to be a legal requirement to clearly label that detail.

reply
friedtofu
39 minutes ago
[-]
Really? That seems odd, where are you looking? Through your Carrier or just for unlocked devices? Depending on who you're with, usually you can just grab an unlocked device and your Carrier to register the device. I've only ever used Google Fi and AT&T though I'm not sure about the others.

Searching duckduckgo for 'Unlocked {device}' returns a lot of results on the shopping tab for phones on Amazon and eBay like the pixel 8/9 plus plenty of other "recent" android devices. Walmart and Bestbuy seem to still have dedicated sections for unlocked phones as well.

reply
karlzt
51 minutes ago
[-]
Is this going to be cheaper than Pixel?
reply
siwatanejo
1 hour ago
[-]
/me stops buying Samsung and waits for next Motorola Flip
reply
globemaster99
1 hour ago
[-]
Hope they make this partnership work out. Probably a 50-50 partnership.
reply
phoronixrly
55 minutes ago
[-]
So... Graphene on a completely Lenovo (Chinese)-owned Motorola Mobility saying they focus more on security than other EU/US vendors. Bold strategy.
reply
maelito
38 minutes ago
[-]
Cool, now we need an Android fork.
reply
zx8080
36 minutes ago
[-]
reply
Imustaskforhelp
1 hour ago
[-]
Yes, This is amazing.

My family had a moto phone and my god does it work till even now while being so snappy. I actually daily drove it for some time quite recently. It only has battery issues (let's hope that EU adds replacable batteries soon as well) and my mom only replaced the phone because she needed app which required the phone update.

Considering this partnership, To me it feels like Motorola can have the update issue be fixed.

Graphene was the reason I was thinking of buying a pixel phone second hand. Actually nope now, I am gonna wait for Motorola to ship GrapheneOS phone. I genuinely wish Motorola good luck for adding grapheneos.

I wish they can add Linux in future too but perhaps that might be asking them of TOO much but this company is probably hearing to the feedback if they have partnered up with grapheneos.

Actually, when I decided to buy my mother the new phone from her old Moto, I made a list and everything and I remember asking her about a new motorola but even me and her (iirc) both were worried about security updates and I saw online reviews/personal experience about software/android version updates being quite an issue which isn't an issue in for example pixel which has 10 years update policy iirc. With grapheneos now being partnered with moto, I do hope that it becomes an issue of the past.

They truly have the chance of becoming a good company for privacy savvy phone users while being affordable and having a good supply chain. I may be getting too excited but whoever thought of the deal must be a genius because I do think that if Motorola plays its cards right, then they definitely got a huge potential unlocked.

reply
atoav
39 minutes ago
[-]
Hardware manufacturers teaming up with and paying for open source software and operating systems is truly how I think we could escape enshittification.

Just give me the hardware and let me run good software on it that works with your hardware.

Motorola is now noted as a candidate for my next phone.

reply
Markoff
21 minutes ago
[-]
how safe is Chinese Lenovo with closed sourced firmware?

btw. Motorola has absolutely trash cameras, doubt GrapheneOS will change anything about it unless you put there gcam maybe, this is significant downgrade from Pixel cameras

btw. yes, it looks like vanilla Android, though it is not, my mother bought it after mine recommendation (previously used Xiaomi phones) and can't say the ROM would be particularly good

reply
NewJazz
1 hour ago
[-]
Eww Lenovo. See what you made us do, Google/Trump2?
reply
ItsHarper
1 hour ago
[-]
What?
reply
NewJazz
1 hour ago
[-]
eww lenovo -> lenovo owns motorola. lenovo is a trash company that ships shitware, even in their firmware, there is shitware

see what you made us do google -> this event is a direct result of google's rug pull of support for pixel devices

google/trump2 -> the current admin is linked to attempts to curtail people's control of their hardware

reply
vsgherzi
26 minutes ago
[-]
Could you expand on the firmware stuff? Do they have bad practices on the firmware?
reply
SyneRyder
10 minutes ago
[-]
Not sure If this is what they're referring to, but 10 years ago Lenovo shipped low-end laptops with pre-installed adware called Superfish that also compromised the HTTPS certificate chain:

https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2015/02/20/lenovo-su...

Pretty terrible, but it was never on the high-end laptops, and plenty of HN folks are running Lenovo ThinkPads anyway.

reply
fsflover
5 minutes ago
[-]
reply
nunobrito
1 hour ago
[-]
So they shaked hands with a long term NSA hardware contractor: https://www.motorolasolutions.com/newsroom/press-releases/na...

Fantastic. Very secure.

reply
abhinavk
47 minutes ago
[-]
Motorola Mobility vs Motorola Solutions. Different companies. Different owners. Different nationalities.
reply
nunobrito
11 minutes ago
[-]
Go ahead and trust them.

I won't.

reply
karel-3d
1 hour ago
[-]
Isn't this Lenovo, a different thing from Mororola Solutions?

edit: yeah it's a different Motorola. Unrelated companies in 2025. Android Motorola is owned by Lenovo, it's a Chinese brand

reply