If anyone is interested in a conversational intro to the subject with lots of pictures, I suggest these semi-famous "Knots Knotes" (amazing title)
BTW is your book out ? (On algebra and programming)
I think that the parent is trolling, but I don't think what you're saying is true. Low number of comments usually means that no one understands the topic, but they still want to upvote because it sounds interesting or geeky. High number of comments usually means a topic where everyone feels like they can chime in without reading the article, just reacting to the title.
We're not that sophisticated. And you have evidence of this on the front page right now. A story about AI copyright with 388 comments, versus Scott Aaronson's short rant about quantum algorithms with 12 comments.
Would we be in agreement that this describes a low quality submission? If not in a way that's the submitter's fault, then at least indicating a low-quality discussion?
Edit: I guess even in your cynical framing, I think the topic only upvoted because people think it's geeky is still usually better than the one where people are reacting to the title.
Commenting is for discussion.
These are orthogonal, mutually exclusive matters.