Teenagers report for duty as Croatia reinstates conscription
9 points
3 hours ago
| 1 comment
| bbc.com
| HN
klipt
1 hour ago
[-]
Male only conscription. Meaning no bodily autonomy for men.
reply
pinkmuffinere
1 hour ago
[-]
Why does male only conscription imply no bodily autonomy for men?
reply
klipt
1 hour ago
[-]
The government forcing you to put your body in harm's way is the opposite of bodily autonomy.
reply
pinkmuffinere
49 minutes ago
[-]
I think I disagree with the claim that this implies _no_ bodily autonomy. People are often compelled to do certain things -- you can be forced to go to court cases/jury duty/jail, to get a vaccines (if you want to attend public school), to stay seated on a flight, etc. These are reductions in autonomy, but I don't think they are complete eliminations. Mandatory military service for n years is a reduction, but I don't think an elimination of bodily autonomy.

That said, I do prefer true equality before law, and if mandatory service is required, I'd prefer to have mandatory service for _everybody_, not just men.

reply
asksomeoneelse
36 minutes ago
[-]
There is a significant difference between jury duty and military service when it comes to risks and bodily harm. Equating the two as both being "reductions" is absurdly missing the point.
reply
pinkmuffinere
31 minutes ago
[-]
I'm not equating them. Military service is a much bigger reduction. But it doesn't seem fair to call it a complete elimination of bodily autonomy -- that's my main claim.
reply
ranger_danger
54 minutes ago
[-]
They're not forcing you, you can register as a conscientious objector.
reply