China Deploys 30k-Ton Liaowang-1 "Floating Supercomputer" to Gulf of Oman
40 points
1 day ago
| 7 comments
| defencesecurityasia.com
| HN
curt15
15 hours ago
[-]
This is obviously not about helping Iran, as the article tries to suggest, but rather to observe US assets and strategies in a live war, especially when lots of stealth aircraft are flying around without Luneberg lenses to mask their true radar signature.
reply
awakeasleep
13 hours ago
[-]
I wonder if they also intend to have a role in providing evidence about who blows up the next grade schools, hospitals, and desalination plants
reply
sinuhe69
22 hours ago
[-]
Physical attacking such vessels is obviously not an option. But I wonder if directed targeted signal jamming and other electronic countermeasures could disrupt or at less severely affect such intelligence gathering. Intelligence gathering, specially signal intelligence is vital for future drone war, so I believe this question will become critical for everybody, regardless if they are pacifists or warmongers.
reply
canxerian
19 hours ago
[-]
Why is your first reaction to attack it?
reply
digitalPhonix
16 hours ago
[-]
I think they’re asking from the context of it being a military vessel being deployed to a relatively hot zone.
reply
exabrial
21 hours ago
[-]
Why not use a few cans of hardware store metallic glitter spray paint on the radomes? Seems a bit cheaper than blowing it up.
reply
Drblessing
19 hours ago
[-]
> Physical attacking such vessels is obviously not an option.

Why not?

reply
Ekaros
13 hours ago
[-]
That is an direct act of war against near peer level opponent. They can't just roll over. But must respond in kind and cause at least similar or larger damage. Say sinking a aircraft carrier or a few.
reply
poulpy123
18 hours ago
[-]
Because china has the means to reply. It's one thing to bully countries that can't defend themselves like Venezuela, Cuba or Iran, it's another one to do the same with the factory of the world
reply
metalman
1 hour ago
[-]
It could backfire in a way that ends American actions like the one the Chinese have pulled there ballistic missled arm chair up to watch the action more closely. The recent embarasment of european tech by chinese tech in pakistan india scuffle, is a hint at what are otherwise unknown Chinese missle capabilities, ie the two OTHER ships in the flotilla, there will of course be many oilers , tenders, and whatnot joining up, complicating things further. Plus given that China got this hardware on site in 10 days, is a message all it's own.
reply
4gotunameagain
19 hours ago
[-]
Ehm, geez, I don't know.. World war three ?

Israel is doing whatever it takes to start it, we must resist.

reply
bix6
22 hours ago
[-]
Is that a telescope in the middle of the ship? It looks like the covering I see at observatories.
reply
estimator7292
8 hours ago
[-]
Yeah, looks like an optical observatory. Probably not astronomical telescopes, the water isn't stable enough for observing space. Most likely they're low power optical telescopes for tracking aircraft.
reply
VegaKH
20 hours ago
[-]
This is a long article that could be a paragraph instead and lose nothing.
reply
Lapsa
10 hours ago
[-]
since when supercomputers are measured in kilotons?
reply
swed420
1 day ago
[-]
PLAN Intelligence Ship Now Watching U.S.–Israel–Iran War From 6,000km Sensor Bubble
reply
gotwaz
23 hours ago
[-]
Waste of time and energy. People forget how much activity happened in that area over 20 years during the Iraq/Afghanistan fiasco that didnt achieve anything. Same story will repeat because the chimp troupe cant handle that level of complexity no matter what toys they have. So its like spending time collecting data on ants, that have learnt to speak and have declared they are going to control the weather. There are better things to waste a life and career on.
reply
dosssman
21 hours ago
[-]
"Greatness cannot be planned" - K. Stanley

Technology, methods and people at the time are bound to have been different, even if only slightly so.

Throughout history, many things were thought of as wasteful and looked over, until some people serendipitously spent time and energy and found some diamond in the dirt.

reply
gsf_emergency_7
17 hours ago
[-]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Stanley#:~:text=lead%2...

What would you say the %time that "research science managers" spend looking in/for the "dirt" should be? 100? 50? 20? 37?

reply