Hisense TVs add unskippable startup ads before live TV
92 points
5 hours ago
| 20 comments
| guru3d.com
| HN
ectospheno
5 hours ago
[-]
Once I verify a home video product works as intended I remove its network connection and never connect it again. I then leave its static ip address configured and block any traffic from it on the off chance it’s ever connected again.

The sole exception is my PlayStation 5. I use apps on it for all streaming.

reply
aerhardt
4 hours ago
[-]
I also had to take this approach with my LG TV. The OS actually had its use for a while but Apple TV has become my driver. I no longer wish to consent to LG’s EULAs which are starting to look like the legal corpus of a small nation. I’m also not interested in their software updates. Internet privileges: revoked.

It’s concerning nonetheless as others are pointing out that in the current trajectory the TVs may soon refuse to display any content unless connected.

reply
user3939382
4 hours ago
[-]
I’ve read reports of these devices turning on wifi and auto connecting to known public wifi networks. Seems we went from a generation of technologists dismissing Stallman as paranoid to one living in his nightmare and not being appropriately familiar with his work, issues of art vs artist aside.
reply
ecshafer
4 hours ago
[-]
Stallman has always been right. Hes a radical, but he was always been right. He is basically prescient with seeing how private software would be used. He was just so early that people thought he was a crazy radical, but now he seems to be stricken with a case of being Cassandra.
reply
RiverCrochet
2 hours ago
[-]
There hasn't been open public wifi networks near where I live for over a decade. It also seems increasingly rare for businesses to have them (they usually have an SSID and password posted somewhere). I don't think this is a thing.

But here's where it might go.

Verizon and other cell companies bundle streaming apps with their plans. It's really not a far leap for them to bundle a TV as well. Especially if TVs get really expensive due to whatever factors - get a 120" TV for just $30 extra on your bill over the next 5 years. And Verizon could contract with an OEM to make a Verizon-specific model, and put a 5G modem in it, and lock it to Verizon service. Verizon's just an example here, AT&T, T-Mobile could do the same.

reply
aerhardt
4 hours ago
[-]
Business idea: a signal-jamming cover for your 65-inch TV.

It looks like shit, is difficult to install, and costs an arm and a leg, but at least it prevents egregious privacy violations from your average chaebol or CCP-intervened corporation!

reply
greatpatton
4 hours ago
[-]
It's simple: not buying them is the way. There is enough competition to just buy a screen that will not do that.
reply
mrweasel
4 hours ago
[-]
You don't really get a lot of options anymore. When people around don't really care and just buy this junk because it's cheap, and they "need" a new TV ever three to four years, for some reason, then you get priced out of the market pretty quickly. Even if you look for TV, and yes I want a TV, not a monitor, without all this junk, there's not really any options available locally anymore. I believe my only option is the Thompson Easy TV, which is great, if I needed a 43" TV or lower.

Apparently I can attempt to import one from Romania, but that seems fairly complicated. Even sites that recommend dumb TVs just recommend SmartTVs that works well as a dumb TV.

reply
HelloMcFly
4 hours ago
[-]
There is not a ton of competition in the OLED TV space
reply
everdrive
4 hours ago
[-]
Who cares? Companies are using your need to have the latest and greatest against you. It's overt manipulation. I'd rather watch an old CRT or nothing at all than allow some company to forcefully show me ads.
reply
xiconfjs
4 hours ago
[-]
fewer competitors every year...Sony gave up as well :/
reply
ducktastic
4 hours ago
[-]
It's ridiculous that going to a Target/Bestbuy/etc you cannot find any non-smart TVs generally. I have had several older models of non-smart tvs that suddenly stop working after a few years. It's disgusting
reply
hellojesus
3 hours ago
[-]
It's either because the non-ad-driven tvs cost more, resulting in too few sales to sustain (because no lifetime revenue from data sales) or the lifetime revenue from data sales is so profitable that companies take the risk on being undercut by a market entrant that will sell dumb tvs.

My guess is that the vast majority of people will trade data for a cheaper price point every time (my wife is certainly one of these people), so the market just can't support the volume of sales necessary to make the price point of dumb tvs competitive.

reply
gtowey
3 hours ago
[-]
A smart TV just means one that can show you advertising and hoover up personal data. This is additional revenue. What company would sell you anything else?
reply
andrepd
4 hours ago
[-]
LG TVs may be rooted. You probably can also run a pi-hole sort of thing to block any traffic except whitelisted domains.

Not that I've done it, I don't get enough value out of it to justify the hassle or the privacy intrusion.

reply
slumberlust
15 minutes ago
[-]
They patched that out many moons ago. If you havent updated in a few years you might have a shot, but most people cannot.
reply
abdullahkhalids
2 hours ago
[-]
According to Root My TV, it seems like all methods of rooting recent LG TVs have been patched.

[1] https://rootmy.tv/

reply
aerhardt
4 hours ago
[-]
The thing stopped being so needy when I neutered its internet access. Maybe it’s still exfiltrating data but at least it has stopped making me anxious that I may need to consult a civil rights lawyer every time I saw their EULA.
reply
ceejayoz
4 hours ago
[-]
Even some cheap Kindles came with a SIM card.

I expect this to happen if enough people block ads on TVs. (They'll probably promote it as a "backup connection" or something.)

reply
xyzzy_plugh
3 hours ago
[-]
I think you're confused. Kindles need to be connected to the Internet so you can purchase and read books on them. The SIM card removed friction from the process e.g. buying books while on vacation or at the airport or whatever.

They didn't put SIM cards in there to spy on you. They were always an opt-in (at additional cost) option for a better user experience.

reply
ceejayoz
2 hours ago
[-]
> They didn't put SIM cards in there to spy on you.

I'm sure Amazon tracked all sorts of activity on those, but that's not the point.

It would be quite trivial to add them to TVs to avoid ad blocking and track behavior when wifi isn't available.

reply
koolba
4 hours ago
[-]
Pro tip for devices that refuse to simply remove working WiFi credentials (cough Samsung), is to connect them to a different “dummy” WiFi and then simply turn that off.

I’ve yet to see a device that caches more than one set of credentials. But I suppose it’s only a matter of time.

reply
albert_e
4 hours ago
[-]
Cat and mouse.

Then we shall only ever connect to a throwaway wifi ssid created for the sole purpose of setting up that TV and deleted promptly afterwards.

Samsung will then use NFC / QuickShare transient hotspot to helpfully sync all useful info from your Samsung phone nearby.

Then we block that IP address or MAC ID from router side.

Then smart TVs will switch to open mesh networks hosted by unsuspecting ISP customer boxes in neighborhood.

And maybe even starlink.

=====

Maybe wifi standard should stop using static passwords and create a device specific hash to let it connect. Wifi admin should get to approve each device connection request.

reply
richardhawthorn
4 hours ago
[-]
I'm going to convert my living room into a Faraday cage, only bringing in pre downloaded content via hard drive. That should solve this problem.

Although I'm not sure my family will be too happy.

reply
im3w1l
4 hours ago
[-]
TV's last a long time. Get one with a bypass today and you can be set for decades.
reply
shantara
43 minutes ago
[-]
With the widespread move to OLED across the TV and monitor manufacturers, this might not be the case for much longer. They look and perform great, but are ultimately a consumable product.
reply
NoSalt
3 hours ago
[-]
I have had my Sharp 65" TV since 2012. It works great, has multiple HDMI ports and a USB port, but I am worried that one day I will need a new TV.
reply
droopyEyelids
4 hours ago
[-]
I have a TCL so maybe it's different, but did your TVs require connection to set up?

The TCL can still act as a HDMI switch with CEC, and that can be labeled through the remote if you want, so there was never any need to connect to a network.

reply
drnick1
2 hours ago
[-]
> Pro tip for devices that refuse to simply remove working WiFi credentials

Is there examples of such devices? AFAIK every smart TV can be switched to HDMI input without being ever connected to the Internet.

reply
ceejayoz
2 hours ago
[-]
My parents got a new smart TV; if you don't give it wifi access it will nag repeatedly about it. Very annoying, and it only takes one time for it to go "Yay! I'll store these forever now."

(It will also wheedle you to re-enable the AI features and telemetry if you turn those off. Which you do like eight levels of confusingly and scarily named submenus.)

reply
drnick1
1 hour ago
[-]
The best course of action here seems to return the TV. Any TV that cannot be permanently switched to HDMI input without nags is unfit for purpose and should be rejected.
reply
p0w3n3d
5 hours ago
[-]
This is outrageous and we need to stand up against it. You're merely avoiding the danger of uber-enshittification of hardware (now once software is enshittified enough), but this will crawl further and further. Meanwhile rating companies are lowering ratings of firms that DO NOT have 'subscription model' in their products, that's why we're intended to pay for enabling heating in car seats from now on.
reply
ectospheno
5 hours ago
[-]
My car has heated and ventilated seats. These do not require a subscription.
reply
john_strinlai
4 hours ago
[-]
https://www.thedrive.com/news/bmw-commits-to-subscriptions-e...

"But while BMW ultimately backed down over heated seats, the company still believes in the features-as-a-service model, and will continue to offer post-purchase upgrades through its ConnectedDrive platform. "

reply
aerhardt
4 hours ago
[-]
I drive a Cupra (a Spanish brand, a spinoff of SEAT, owned by Volkswagen) and when I was driving my car out of the dealership I had to tell the salesman I was not interested in signing up for the free app they were trying to foist me. He was dumbfounded. The model was selling like hotcakes yet I was the first customer that had outright refused to sign up for their shitty app. They pulled off the inevitable switcheroo, it now costs a monthly fee and I don’t want to think about what insidious things they can do with it.
reply
drnick1
2 hours ago
[-]
Chances are the dealer and manufacturer can still get telemetry data through the cellular modem built into the car. You will need to remove it to be reasonably sure that data isn't extracted.
reply
aerhardt
2 hours ago
[-]
I know they are because they called me for service at the 10k km mark, but at least they’re not charging me for the pleasure.
reply
drnick1
1 hour ago
[-]
The issue is that data is also shared with third parties, such as insurance companies and possibly the government. I could not, in good conscience, drive a car that spies on me and can be effectively controlled remotely.
reply
greatpatton
4 hours ago
[-]
And then they will complain that Chinese company are simply crushing them... As a European, I have been buying only Asian cars for ages as I don't want to play their "add options" game, and I think that more and more people are tired of that.
reply
soco
4 hours ago
[-]
The enshittification and lack of market understanding (or care) of the major European car brands is a topic by itself. They may be rightfully complaining right now but a lot of their woes are self inflicted.
reply
loloquwowndueo
3 hours ago
[-]
My car’s seats are warmed by my butt. They’re very happy and comfortable and I didn’t have to pay a dime.
reply
dwedge
4 hours ago
[-]
For now
reply
kotaKat
4 hours ago
[-]
The TV manufacturers know they can get a guaranteed $30-50/year spliff out of the platform vendors per unit for allowing the shitware in the first place and that these TVs will last long enough to get them a nice several hundred dollar subsidy on the TV.

I’m afraid there’s not going to be a great affordable path out of this hypersubsidized trap we’ve set the market into.

reply
everdrive
4 hours ago
[-]
Consumers just keep putting up with it. TVs are not a necessity; it's not like electric bills or healthcare. There are more ways to consume content than ever before, and more content available than ever before. Not owning a TV in the 80s or 90s was something of a big deal. Now, it couldn't matter less. But people are still putting up with whatever crap manufacturers are putting out. It should be easy to vote with wallet (even that means simply not purchasing a TV) but consumers just keep buying this crap.
reply
beej71
4 hours ago
[-]
Searching for "commercial display" will get you some dumb TVs. They tend to cost 2x, but you get what you pay for.

We just gave away our 55" Hisense to our friend. I hope she doesn't think it means we hate her now. ;)

(Side note: not having a TV in the living space allowed us to freely design it to be a living space.)

reply
pithos
3 hours ago
[-]
What do you do with this living space without a TV? Serious question from someone who grew up with a TV companion. I imagine this is what the current generation feels when thinking about smartphones.
reply
beej71
2 hours ago
[-]
We curl up on the couch and look at our phones. ;)

Actually we've made an effort to have people over more now, and we gather around the coffee table to chat. And even when we don't have people over, we're more likely to talk and be social.

reply
bilekas
5 hours ago
[-]
Ughh.. I recently turned on my 1000EUR+ LG Oled TV to find that it had automatically installed a Copilot app.. And keeps doing it every few days.

Is there any smart TV that I can actually just use a TV how I want? Or am I reduced to buying an Apple TV device and unplugging the TV from the internet entirely ?

reply
imglorp
5 hours ago
[-]
Right, never give a TV internet access now. That's where we are.

This means they can't surveil, brick, or change your hardware after you bought it.

So yes, then add whatever dongles to provide content. If the dongle turns bad (evil), chuck it and get a different kind. You preserve your privacy, hardware ownership rights, and freedom to choose.

reply
dwedge
4 hours ago
[-]
One of the main aims of 5G rollout was for the eventual inclusion of sims in these devices
reply
nszceta
4 hours ago
[-]
For 5G enabled devices the medicine is to cut the antenna off
reply
gruez
4 hours ago
[-]
I'll believe it when I see it. The numbers simply don't pencil out. Streaming ads over cellular networks is going to be insanely expensive at rates that IOT/esim providers are currently offering. Not to mention that most people would connect to wifi anyways so they can watch neflix or whatever without a second device. If a 5G module costs $25 but only 10% of people actually never connect to wifi, you're basically paying $250 just to get that incremental customer connected.
reply
imglorp
4 hours ago
[-]
Not for ads, but maybe the numbers work out if you're selling intel. How much is a household's watching habits worth on the market? How about keyword mentions in the room?
reply
floatrock
4 hours ago
[-]
Protection of one's attention is our generation's luxury product.

Whether it's the TV hardware or the streaming service in your house, your standard of living is now judged by whether you pay extra for the ad-free tier.

Apple tends to skew luxury purchase, so it makes sense it hasn't been riddled with adware yet. The Apple logo is a status symbol that you're not being bombarded with ads in every corner of underutilized screen real-estate.

reply
blitzar
5 hours ago
[-]
> an Apple TV device and unplugging the TV from the internet entirely

Had this setup on different tvs for 10+ years, can confirm it is excellent.

reply
krzat
4 hours ago
[-]
I guess it's a matter of time until TVs include GSM modem for ads and DRM.
reply
drnick1
2 hours ago
[-]
Cars already do, and the solution is to remove the modem.
reply
vikingerik
4 hours ago
[-]
One workaround is to buy a computer monitor and use that instead. Most of those are still pretty dumb HDMI or USB terminals that you can plug any signal source into. They don't come in huge sizes like TVs (although search "digital signage" for some options), and you'll need a dedicated sound speaker system, but this route could be an option.
reply
newscracker
4 hours ago
[-]
> Is there any smart TV that I can actually just use a TV how I want?

I’ve heard that large computer monitors and TVs intended to be used as displays can be used without connecting them to a network.

> Or am I reduced to buying an Apple TV device and unplugging the TV from the internet entirely ?

An Apple TV is a good choice even otherwise. I’ve never seen a smoother and quicker interface on a native Smart TV (granted that I’ve only seen Android and webOS). I use my Apple TV as the only network connected device while my TV is not connected to any network ever. Once in a while, I update the TV’s firmware by downloading it to a thumb drive and plugging that into the USB port of the TV.

reply
drnick1
2 hours ago
[-]
Better yet, use a Linux HTPC. The Apple TV box is comically restricted. For example, because there is no web browser, there is no straightforward way to watch YouTube ad-free on it.
reply
Larrikin
4 hours ago
[-]
A Shield is the better choice because you can install apps that Apple would never approve of.
reply
newscracker
4 hours ago
[-]
But the Nvidia Shield has (or had?) ads from Google, right? I recall there was news coverage and some uproar when this happened a few years ago.
reply
Larrikin
4 hours ago
[-]
The default Google launcher is a disgusting mess. But since it is an Android, you do not have to use it and can use one of the many ad free ones. I use Projectivy
reply
codeflo
5 hours ago
[-]
> Or am I reduced to buying an Apple TV device and unplugging the TV from the internet entirely ?

At least until TV makers wise up to that strategy and build a TV that requires internet access to unlock the HDMI port, that's the way to go.

reply
drewg123
4 hours ago
[-]
I don't have a reference, but I remember reading that some Samsung TVs require internet access to get past initial setup and allow access to HDMI. So we might already be here..
reply
everdrive
4 hours ago
[-]
>Or am I reduced to buying an Apple TV device and unplugging the TV from the internet entirely?

Why would this be something that you're "reduced" to? Why would it be a bad thing?

reply
bilekas
2 hours ago
[-]
It kind of defeats the initial purpose of buying a smart tv though. I wanted to avoid having an extra peripheral for connectivity.
reply
everdrive
1 hour ago
[-]
No such device exists, though. All smart TVs are as user hostile as manufacturers believe they can get away with. If they could make them worse for the user, they would. They're just pushing the boundaries as far as they can.
reply
Frotag
4 hours ago
[-]
Alternatively, dns block the update domains, wait a few months to few years for someone to discover an exploit for rooting, root and sideload.
reply
hellojesus
3 hours ago
[-]
What happens when they move from default dns to ech with pinned dns servers? I was reading about ech a bit yesterday so I could keep up with apps trying to circumvent dns filtering on my kids' devices.

Usually I require a root cert so devices can have their traffic inspected or be isolated into an unsafe network where most nonessential traffic is blocked by default. I suppose letting an iot device connect will become more risky in the future when I can't control the dns resolver or can't confidently block requests through dns alone.

reply
smusamashah
4 hours ago
[-]
IF its an android, connect to it via ADB and disable all the BS apps, even launcher. I am using projectivity launcher on mine, even has child lock which we really need. No ads or popups etc at all. YouTube is all we watch on this TV anyway, and retro gaming and movies.

I also have Nvidia Shield connected to it, that one is setup the same way.

reply
steveBK123
5 hours ago
[-]
I would also like to know the answer here because I see similar slop across brands/prices/sizes/generations of TV now.. its inescapable
reply
zvqcMMV6Zcr
4 hours ago
[-]
It is totally bonkers. For long time the low tech recommendation (without setting rules on router/firewall) was to never connect TV to network, and use cheap TV box, to use streaming services. And then community's favorite - TiVo - started to show their own ads. Everything based on Android TV is also hit or miss. And might get enshitified with an update at any time. I think NVidia Shield is the only device other than AppleTV that works as expected. Only it didn't have an hardware upgrade in 5+ years.
reply
steveBK123
4 hours ago
[-]
It's unfortunate that the 2020s era Apple is so big/rich, in a way. Old Apple used to dabble in all sorts of niches, but now they need to sell 10M units/year to move the needle. So they'll never just make a TV now.
reply
tjpnz
4 hours ago
[-]
I bought a Sony Android TV a few years back which has yet to be enshitified - doesn't shove ads or shovelware down my throat, acts like a TV. It's a model made for the Japanese market though and they may have incentives to play nice with domestic customers.
reply
phaser
3 hours ago
[-]
Reminds me of the people of the future in Mike Judge’s “Idiocracy” who watch large TVs where most of the space is taken by advertising.

It’s amazing how this one turned morphed from humor into an eerie warning of the future in 20 years.

https://youtu.be/YqQ6D0Bu-a8

reply
erremerre
4 hours ago
[-]
Here could some European company that already makes tv to step in and create something good, with no ads, and even better if they promise to open the sourcecode, bootloader etc... Something like Philips for example. But I guess they are too busy making lightbulbs to notice that they could fill that gap on the TV market space.
reply
deafpolygon
31 minutes ago
[-]
european TVs aren’t that much better
reply
mathgeek
5 hours ago
[-]
Hopefully these can still be blocked by adguard et al: https://old.reddit.com/r/Adblock/comments/116144l/is_there_a...
reply
andsoitis
5 hours ago
[-]
Hisense has low taste.
reply
ASalazarMX
1 hour ago
[-]
IMO when ads have to be force-fed to consumers means the ad industry has already jumped the shark. Advertising is dominated by a few giants, trying to push a niche of even more ads becomes a waste of resources for always diminishing returns.

Yet advertisers still believe more ads always mean more sales.

reply
andsoitis
5 hours ago
[-]
> live TV

Does anyone watch linear TV other than for sport and news?

Everything else (movies, TV shows) is through streaming apps, no?

reply
ThinkingGuy
4 hours ago
[-]
My local PBS station has some good shows (ad-free)
reply
jonhohle
4 hours ago
[-]
We might watch it “live”, but it’s through a TiVo, and not the tuner in the TV. Usually, though, we start the few scheduled shows we watch 30-60m late to be able to skip commercials.
reply
vitaflo
4 hours ago
[-]
We only watch OTA TV and have no streaming services so I guess the answer is yes.
reply
andsoitis
4 hours ago
[-]
Cool. Do you have a favorite new TV show that you’re watching currently and that you’d recommend?
reply
DoctorOW
4 hours ago
[-]
Not the person you were responding to but I work at a TV station here in the US. What kind of shows do you like? My husband and I are getting into "The Rise and Fall of Reggie Dinkins" if you want a new show. If new episodes of a long running show is fine, I still relax to Jeopardy when I can. If you don't stream anything, you can usually still find golf on the weekends which we use for our cats. :)
reply
st_goliath
4 hours ago
[-]
In the past, you had to wait for the tubes to warm up, before you got a picture.

Nowadays, you have to wait for the thing to finish booting.

In the future, you have to wait for the ads to finish playing?

reply
MathMonkeyMan
2 hours ago
[-]
Gotta chug that verification can.
reply
wat10000
2 hours ago
[-]
More and more I think that advertising should just be banned. People will tell me it's useful. I don't believe it. But even if it were true, it's not worth it. Sorry, advertisers, you abused it horribly, you ruined it for everyone.
reply
LaSombra
4 hours ago
[-]
I'll keep not connecting my TV to the Internet and keep using a Fire TV stick for now.
reply
Dwedit
3 hours ago
[-]
Fire Stick/Fire TV is a pretty dreadful experience as it is. Video ads on the home screen, but at least you can currently install custom apps. No way to replace the home screen.
reply
deafpolygon
36 minutes ago
[-]
i am never buying another smart tv again. we all should vote with our wallet, but alas — such is life.

i will be replacing my existing (3 year old tv) when its time with a pc monitor and yes, i will go down in size. i’ve found that really large tbs aren’t really adding that much and dominate your house the minute you walk in.

reply
dotcoma
4 hours ago
[-]
That’s what I call progress! ;)
reply
lpcvoid
4 hours ago
[-]
I have a rooted LG WebOS TV. It's really nice. I can ssh into it. It's on a dedicated VLAN which has all LG domains and IP firewalled off. It can connect to Youtube, using a version of the Youtube app with integrated adblocker and sponsorblock. It's absolute superb.
reply
newscracker
4 hours ago
[-]
Do you have any recommended links for such a setup? I don’t connect my TV to the network and use it with an Apple TV. But I’m interested to know more on this.
reply
lpcvoid
3 hours ago
[-]
Sure, first you check if your TV is rootable: https://cani.rootmy.tv/

If not, you can try and find one on Ebay or local classifieds that is. That's the hardest part.

Then you setup a VLAN (I use OpenWRT, which has great support for this) and some firewall rules that forbid all traffic that isn't port 80 or 443. Then you create a dnsmasq blacklist for all the LG domains (good list is [1]).

Then you install this: https://github.com/webosbrew/youtube-webos

Enjoy Youtube on a large screen under your control without ads, and without annoying sponsors.

[1] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hagezi/dns-blocklists/main...

reply
daft_pink
4 hours ago
[-]
Love my Apple TV box. Just sayin’

Why you would want your TV Manufacturer to control the experience at this point I have no idea. 5-6 years ago, we were a Roku only household. Now we are Apple TV all the way and haven’t looked back.

reply
drchaim
4 hours ago
[-]
The other day I was at a spa, they had a TV in the background showing a channel with relaxing images, but after 5 minutes ads started playing.I don't think the spa staff even knew about it. we're fucked
reply
RankingMember
1 hour ago
[-]
Reminds me of someone who tweeted at YouTube about an experience trying to perform CPR and the CPR video on YouTube got interrupted by an unskippable ad
reply
The-Bus
4 hours ago
[-]
This is likely either a YouTube/Roku channel that shows relaxing images but monetizes them via ads.
reply
globular-toast
4 hours ago
[-]
If someone was offering you a sweet but in exchange they punched you in the face, you'd probably question whether the sweet was really worth it. Unless, of course, you're addicted to the sweets.

Time to kick the addiction. Seek out ways to spend your time that are good for you and/or others.

reply
xuhu
4 hours ago
[-]
It's not sweets and it's not an addiction, not everything on TV is for mindless consumption. The viewer is not who's at fault here. The right mindset is not "accept their terms or give up", it's "make your voice heard and try to make the manufacturers change their practices".
reply
dekken_
4 hours ago
[-]
this is theft of time
reply
ramesh31
5 hours ago
[-]
Worth it for the price though. A 100" Hisense can be had for $1k now at Best Buy. Would have been a $20,000 TV 10 years ago.
reply
chung8123
5 hours ago
[-]
At 100" the packaging, shipping from china, the delivery, etc. add have to be so much more than $1k.

I bought a 100" TV with setup and it was only $1600. I don't know how they make money on that with all the logistics required. Two people for delivery, two different people for the wall hanging, all the materials for the packaging, and that is just to get it to my house.

reply
dgacmu
4 hours ago
[-]
Shipping from China to a US coastal warehouse is probably modestly under $200, including packaging, assuming it's shipped in a 40" container. Possibly less if there's other cargo that can be used to fill the remaining space.

I suspect the domestic costs are really dependent on volume (like, can you ship a container of 45 TVs to a warehouse near NYC or do you have to ship each unit individually) and I don't feel confident estimating that side of it.

reply
steveBK123
5 hours ago
[-]
The problem is slopware is everywhere now

You can buy a $5k TV and its startup time, auto-play adware at the Home Screen, constant OS popup notification BS, etc are almost universal.

You can't buy your way out of scammy experiences anymore because the market has figured out the people most able to afford buying their way out of it are the highest value ad/scam targets.

reply
The-Bus
4 hours ago
[-]
Hisense has never operated at the top end of the spectrum. They can sell these TVs for $1000 because they're buying the cheapest panels that the actual high-end TVs aren't using.
reply
summermusic
4 hours ago
[-]
It's amazing how cheap Hisense TVs are, but the two we got are developing really bad white spots just outside the warranty period. You get what you pay for I guess.
reply
ktallett
5 hours ago
[-]
Another brand I will not buy. What has become of so many companies selling out? Apple, Lenovo, Hisense, and so on.
reply
cr125rider
5 hours ago
[-]
It’s unfair to say Apple has sold out when they’re the last bastion of commercial streaming boxes that aren’t riddled with ads
reply
Y-bar
4 hours ago
[-]
Depends on your definition of ”ads”. As someone deep in the apple ecosystem without a subscription to Music or Apple TV I get regular full screen promotions/ads to subscribe when all I want to do is listen or watch my bought content.
reply
RankingMember
1 hour ago
[-]
Yeah I see them creeping in everywhere in Apple's world- now there are ads in Apple Wallet
reply
shantara
33 minutes ago
[-]
Connecting new AirPods to an iPhone for the first time now shows Apple Music subscription ad right on the pairing screen
reply
rebeccaskinner
4 hours ago
[-]
It is pretty riddled with ads though. By default the Home Screen shows the tv all and it’s completely crammed with ads.
reply
chung8123
5 hours ago
[-]
Supply and demand. Unfortunately there are way more people that would rather the lower price than the ad-free.
reply
yccs27
4 hours ago
[-]
I'm not so sure this is really a free market equilibrium. There are two effects which explain the prevalence of ads even if consumers are willing to pay more for ad-free products:

- Imperfect information, aka Market for Lemons: It can be hard to find out how prevalent ads will be when buying a product. Consumers often make a purchasing decision without knowledge about ads.

- Changing terms after lock-in, aka Enshittification: Manufacturers (like Hisense here) can add advertising to products after consumers have already bought them. Initially, consumers have negotiation power since they can freely choose a product, but later they are locked in and cannot easily react to the manufacturer changing the product to their detriment.

reply