What exactly are you asking for, just some commiserative platitudes? I don't think anyone is under the false impression that these are awesome jobs, but the fact is, they are jobs. The people doing them are getting paid to do them. Why would data labellers be more deserving of sympathy than any other type of office worker?
This makes no sense. AI sex bots don’t need humans texting and role playing.
I don’t think whoever wrote this article understands what AI is.
Note the fist job of describing what was in the video seems like somebody building a AI dataset.
https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2025/the-company-whose--ai--wa... The company whose ‘AI’ was actually 700 humans in India
https://www.businessinsider.com/amazons-just-walk-out-actual... Amazon's Just Walk Out technology relies on hundreds of workers in India watching you shop
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/former-nate-ceo-human-worke... Former nate CEO who used human workers instead of AI allegedly defrauded investors lured by new tech of millions
It's very much an ensemble method. That's why people pay for it over just downloading an abliterated model from hf with system prompt hacking. Go and try it, the SOTA of role-playing models still have a lot to be desired
This seems unlikely to me, given it'd increase costs and the response times would make it obvious.
The messages presented in the original source appear to be people expecting to be talking to a real person, likely on a dating app. The relation to AI is only speculative, and mostly in the direction of "my messages may be used to train a chatbot to replace my job of deceiving people" - which is plausible.
> That's why people pay for it over just downloading an abliterated model from hf with system prompt hacking.
I'd assume convenience, fine-tuning, and using a larger model than it's feasible for most people to run locally.
What is an "AI sex bot" ?
Because ChatGTP, Claude, Gemini, Grock and Mistral can all ERP...