Iran is actually attacking their former close friends at the gulf uninvolved civilian population centers more often than it attacks Israel
Estimated around 4 million of them against south Lebanon:
https://imeu.org/resources/key-issues/quick-facts-israels-il...
https://www.hrw.org/report/2008/02/16/flooding-south-lebanon...
The map of countries which sign the convention against landmines is extremely obvious in that context.
No such country exists. So long as enemies are likely to put boots, wheels, or tracks on the ground in your country, landmines are extremely useful, extremely cheap, and extremely effective.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_Iran#Re...
Israel has supreme court Arab Muslim judge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khaled_Kabub
The "apartheid" only exists in the imagination of antisemites like you.
Maybe it's just me, but if I were in such a suboptimal defensive materiel position, I would try diplomacy first. In fact, I would make it my mission to be the world recognized leader in diplomacy.
That's what your logic sounds like
> Iran and Israel have maintained no diplomatic relations since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and their relationship has been characterized by hostility ever since.
And their policy of overlooking violence against the previous inhabitants. Genocide slow burn.
So I don’t know what good any diplomacy could have been in that context.
So slow it's going backwards.