Electronics for Kids, 2nd Edition
119 points
2 days ago
| 4 comments
| nostarch.com
| HN
WalterBright
2 hours ago
[-]
In the 1960s, Kosmos made the best electronics sets available. If you went through the kits, you received a complete undergraduate course in electronics (less the calculus).

https://generalatomic.com/teil1/index.html

reply
goku12
55 minutes ago
[-]
There ought to be something similar for calculus too. While a detailed and formal treatment of the subject can be delayed till the age at which it's introduced now, I feel that the intuition and feel for calculus can be formed more efficiently at an earlier age.

If nothing else, it may help them understand where to seek solutions for the common problems they encounter. I started learning Electronics at a fairly young age using undergraduate level textbooks that I found lying around. The need for and relationships between concepts in calculus, logarithms and trigonometry were a recurrent problem for me.

PS: If anybody is wondering, those books were from an earlier generation engineer. They were very interesting, to say the least. All the circuits (amplifiers, rectifiers, oscillators, multivibrators, mixers, various RF Txr and Rxr designs, etc) were using vacuum tubes! Diodes, triodes, pentodes, thyratrons, magnetrons, TWTs, etc were used liberally in them. It had a description of an early form of the Instrumental Landing System (ILS). There were also descriptions of some early generation semiconductor devices and their similarity to vacuum tubes. I don't think ICs were in much use back then, because the book had no mentions about them.

I used to spend hours at a time with those books when I was a child. Later I graduated in Electronics engineering and went on to work on the avionics for a satellite launcher. Vacuum tubes were museum pieces by the time I was born. But I was the only one in my undergraduate class who had seen or knew anything about vacuum tubes, when we had lessons on CRTs, magnetrons, etc. I can't stress how deeply those books influenced my education and career. Sweet memories!

reply
eth0up
6 hours ago
[-]
I figure it's fair enough, since this is a great but not free book, to drop https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/ - a truly amazing, and in my opinion extraordinarily well written and organized free learning resource.

Specifically https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/

reply
chromacity
5 hours ago
[-]
It's a labor of love and a great reference to go back to, but I wouldn't recommend it for newcomers.

Traditional books benefit from having an editor who (ideally) asks questions like "who are you writing for", "what's the best order to introduce ideas", and "how much detail is enough". If you don't ask these questions, you often end up getting too deep into the weeds or jumping back and forth between ideas in ways that can be difficult to follow. To give you a specific example, the guide spends a lot of time on some of the more obscure theories in DC network analysis before even defining what a battery is, capacitors and inductors are explained in the DC section by focusing on their AC characteristics, there is a ton of unnecessary quantum physics trivia ahead of explaining what a diode is, discussion of op-amps kicks off with an odd reference to calculus, etc.

Again, I don't mean that as a criticism, it's just that (properly edited) books have their merits.

reply
eth0up
5 hours ago
[-]
I think you make excellent points and can't see anything I don't agree with. For me, there's no substitute for a proper book, especially being a bit of an eccentric learner.

But certainly AAC could be a brilliant supplementary resource.

reply
duskwuff
4 hours ago
[-]
The Art of Electronics, by Horowitz and Hill, is aimed at a university or professional audience, but could also be an incredible learning resource for a younger student (or older hobbyist!) interested in learning more about the field.

Speaking for myself, I would have loved to read something like this when I was first experimenting with electronics as a child. A lot of the details would have gone over my head, but even just knowing the general outlines of the topics it covered would have been a huge step up.

reply
holyhnhell
5 hours ago
[-]
Upvoted for the unhinged but on the money profile bio. May Michael O’Church be with you, kind stranger.
reply
viburnum
4 hours ago
[-]
Is there a parts kit sold for this book? I couldn't find one online.
reply
theophrastus
4 hours ago
[-]
reply
boredatoms
4 hours ago
[-]
Im reminded of a book from Dick Smith in the 90s called “Funway into electronics”.

It had a wonderful kit where you would use screws in a board so you could see every wire path. Much easier to explain than modern breadboards

reply
kgwxd
4 hours ago
[-]
Discontinued until they can add age verification to wires.
reply
oytis
6 hours ago
[-]
As a parent I would appreciate if it came with an age recommendation.
reply
Bishonen88
6 hours ago
[-]
It's right there on the page. Age 10 and above
reply
plant-ian
3 hours ago
[-]
I had a hard time finding it as well. I think maybe because the text is underlined and the font is small? It is harder to read "into" that text. Maybe it should be on its own line? Or it should be up next to "Full Color" / the cover? Maybe some "copy" pro would know the reason right away but it seems rather hard to find to me.
reply
BeetleB
2 hours ago
[-]
While I agree that it could be more prominent, the old man in me wants to scream "Don't be so lazy in reading!"

If you ignore the reviews near the end, the page doesn't have a lot of text. And not everything needs to be accessible by quickly scanning.

reply
jen20
1 hour ago
[-]
I found the age guidance with cmd+F, "age", enter. Probably would have tried "year" next if that hadn't found it.
reply
kgwxd
4 hours ago
[-]
As a parent, I find the age recommendations insulting.
reply
goku12
1 hour ago
[-]
It's only a recommendation, not a strict instruction. It's the age group that the author is targeting and is assumed to have the requisite background knowledge and reasoning skills required to follow the material. It's understood to vary between individuals.

This is similar to 'intended audience' section of technical books for adults. Do you find those insulting?

reply