Ask HN: Why isn't the NSA categorized as an APT?
5 points
19 hours ago
| 6 comments
| HN
Israel Unit-8200 is an APT Iran has like 4 APT's under its army Why isn't the NSA categorized as an APT?

APT definition: APTs are state-run, organized, and stealthy. The NSA fits this definition.

Can someone explain this? Is it only politics?

sloaken
13 hours ago
[-]
It is perspective. From the Iranian stance, NSA is an APT and theirs is not. Likewise the UK version, Russian versions etc.

Them / Us.

reply
KomoD
18 hours ago
[-]
reply
cochinescu
18 hours ago
[-]
It's probably more about convention and terminology. Security researchers tend to label foreign actors as APTs partly for tracking and reporting purposes. With domestic agencies, especially US ones, there's either reluctance or it's treated as a given.
reply
rl1987
15 hours ago
[-]
Because it's not wrong when "we" (i.e. those naming who counts as APT) are doing it.
reply
tim-tday
17 hours ago
[-]
Remember the Snowden leaks? They are.
reply
mhb
18 hours ago
[-]
WTF is an APT?
reply
AnimalMuppet
18 hours ago
[-]
Advanced Persistent Threat. It's a cyber security term.
reply
sloaken
13 hours ago
[-]
Thanks. Well that answers the question. Opponents are threats, your tools to counter are not.

As in: Your gun is a threat to me, my gun is how I defend against YOUR gun.

reply