Ask HN: Is anyone still resisting the slop onslaught?
7 points
8 hours ago
| 5 comments
| HN
Even as recently as a month or two ago his site seemed, to me at least, to be one of the final bastions of the public internet without a significant portion of its content being AI generated. Now, it feels like at least half of the articles I click on are full of LLM-isms and otherwise obviously AI generated. In spite of this, the comments are full of enthusiastic agreement or ardent dissent. Out of dozens of comments, none bother to acknowledge the inauthenticity of the content.

Is it finally time to throw in the towel accept the inevitable? Is it enough that the topic of an article or blogpost is interesting, even if the text itself is a pile of tokens?

nicbou
10 minutes ago
[-]
My work requires a lot of original research, and I'm putting a lot of information online for the first time. I'll run my website until traffic goes to zero. The work is important and I care.

The big change is that traffic from the website covered my bills. Eventually, I'll have to earn a living through other means, and that means I have less energy for it.

reply
johng
6 hours ago
[-]
I've been seeing lots of sites ban AI content, so it's not just you. At the very least, I think there should be a law that requires AI content, videos, etc. to be identified as AI. It's getting really hard to tell what is even real and what isn't now :(
reply
ares623
8 hours ago
[-]
No. I keep going because I still care.
reply
bediger4000
7 hours ago
[-]
I flag all "built $X with AI" posts, and downvote all comments on them.

For some reason "vibe coding" irritates me as does slop.

reply
verdverm
8 hours ago
[-]
If you are unaware, HN introduced a new rule because of the slop onslaught (onslopt?)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47340079

It will take time for the hype to wind down still. Still a lot of people thinking they can plant a money tree because code is "easy" now, but it was never really the hard part anyway.

reply